Effective hemostasis with double-balloon rectal catheter for uncontrolled bleeding during endoscopic mucosal resection of large rectal neoplasms
28. Mai 2013 (online)
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard treatment for intramucosal colorectal neoplasms. Bleeding is one of the common complications of EMR  . Bleeding is often stopped using hemoclips , soft coagulation with hemostatic forceps , and hypertonic saline–epinephrine injection , but it may be difficult to locate the bleeding vessel if the bleeding is continuous or massive.
The Y-tube double-balloon rectal catheter (Create Medic, Yokohama, Japan; [Fig. 1]) is designed for use during barium enema examinations. The catheter is approximately 40 cm in length and has two separate balloons at the tip.
We report three cases of effective hemostasis using a barium enema balloon catheter for uncontrolled bleeding during EMR of large rectal polyps. All lesions were located in the lower part of the rectum, adjacent to the anal verge. The lesions were 20 mm, 30 mm, and 50 mm in diameter. One of the three lesions was endoscopically removed en bloc ([Fig. 2 a]) and two were removed by piecemeal EMR. Bleeding occurred immediately after the removal of each lesion ([Fig. 2 b]). In each case, hemostatic forceps could not be used as the bleeding vessel could not be detected because of the massive bleeding.
The double-balloon catheter was therefore used to compress the vessel and control the bleeding. The catheter was inserted via the anus into the rectum, and the balloon was inflated with up to 40 mL of air. The balloon was deflated and the catheter was removed after 5 – 15 minutes, with the scope then being re-inserted to examine whether or not the bleeding had stopped ([Fig. 2 c]). If the bleeding had not stopped, a second period of balloon compression was applied.
When visibility is poor and detection of the bleeding vessel is obscured as a result of continuous or massive bleeding in the rectal region, hemostasis with a balloon catheter is an effective and expedient treatment method.
- 1 Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1116-1122
- 2 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al. Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 376-380
- 3 Binmoeller KF, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Endoscopic hemoclip treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 167-170
- 4 Nagata S, Kimura S, Oogoshi H et al. Endoscopic hemostasis of gastric ulcer bleeding by hemostatic forceps coagulation. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 22-S25
- 5 Matsui N, Sugi M, Bai X et al. Effective hemostasis with hypertonic saline-epinephrine solution for uncontrolled bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection of the stomach. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 476