Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2012; 44(03): 232-234
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1323789
Leser fragen – Experten antworten
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Kofferdam in der Kieferorthopädie

Rubber Dam Isolation in Orthodontics
J. Hourfar
1   Kieferorthopädische Fachpraxis, Reinheim
,
B. Ludwig
2   Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
3   Kieferorthopädische Fachpraxis, Traben-Trarbach
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 October 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Frage
In welchen Situationen ist die ­Verwendung von Kofferdam in der ­Kieferorthopädie sinnvoll?

Antwort


#
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Winkler R. Sanford Christie Barnum – Der Erfinder des Kofferdam. Quintessenz 1991; 42: 483-486
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Barbakow A. The rubber dam: a 100 year history. J Am Acad Gold Foil Oper 1965; 8: 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Betz W. Kofferdam. In: Heidemann D. (eds.). Endodontie Praxis der Zahnheilkunde. Urban und Fischer; München Jena: 2001: 43-55
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Der Große Brockhaus Verlag F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig 1929
    PubMed
  • 5 Simonsen R. The rubber dam – dentistry’s ugly duckling. Quintessence Int 1984; 15: 1101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Buonocore M. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Baumann M. Kofferdam. In: Baumann M, Beer R. (eds.). Farbatlanten der Zahnmedizin – Endodontologie. Georg Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart New York: 2008: 99-108
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Kamann W. Kofferdam – Wandel von Indikation und Technik. Schweiz MSchr Zahnmed 1998; 108: 771-777
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Knierim R. Invisisible Lower Cuspid to Cuspid Retainer. Angle Orthod 1973; 43: 218-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Liebenberg W. Rubber dam isolation of the working field in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1993; 27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Clark S, Gordon P, McCabe J. An ex vivo investigation to compare orthodontic bonding using a 4-META-based adhesive or a composite adhesive to acid-etched and sandblasted enamel. J Orthod 2003; 30: 51-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Toroglu M, Bayramoglu O, Yarkin F et al. Possibility of Blood and Hepatitis B Contamination Through Aerosols Generated During Debonding Procedures. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 571-578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stern R, Berkowitz R, Shurin S et al. Multiple microaerophilic streptococcal lung abscesses after orthodontic treatment. Pediatrics 1982; 70: 722-724
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chate R. Safer orthodontic debonding with rubber dam. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103: 171-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arnone R. Bonding orthodontic lower 3 to 3 retainers with a rubber dam: a second generation step-by-step procedure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 432-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reis A, dos Santos J, Dourado Loguercio A et al. Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 94-99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Heringer M, Almeida M, Miguel J. Direct bond brackets: cotton roll versus rubber dam isolation. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 231-234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children – a survey of patient and appliance management. J Orthod 2001; 28: 39-44
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic Treatment for the Special Needs Child. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2009; 41: 63-73
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chaushu S, Gozal D, Becker A. Intravenous sedation: an adjunct to enable orthodontic treatment for children with disabilities. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 81-89
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Chaushu S, Zeltser R, Becker A. Safe orthodontic bonding for children with disabilities during general anaesthesia. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 225-228
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Tacken M, Cosyn J, de Wilde P et al. Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 117-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mavrommatis M. Zuverlässigkeit der Retention mit Cuspidretainer im Unterkiefer. 2006 Med Diss, Giessen, Giessen
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stick Tech Ltd. Turku Finnland. Instructions for use – everStick®ORTHO. www.Sticktech.com accessed Feb 12 – 2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Störmann I, Ehmer U. A Prospective Randomized Study of Different Retainer Types. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63: 42-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kern M, Eschbach S. Kleben – Neue Wege in der Prothetik. Zahnärztl Mitt 2008; 98: 44-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hain M, Longman L, Field E et al. Natural rubber latex allergy: implications for the orthodontist. J Orthod 2007; 34: 6-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Patel A, Burden D, Sandler P. Medical Disorders and Orthodontics. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2009; 41: 23-41
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar