Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012; 72(9): 804-808
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315355
Review
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prevention of Labour-Associated Pelvic Floor Injuries – What is Known for Sure

Prävention geburtsbedingter Beckenbodenschädigung – Was ist gesichert?
H. B.G. Franz
1   Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig
,
C. Erxleben
2   Charite – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin
,
A. Franz
2   Charite – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin
,
R. Hofmann
1   Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 26 July 2012
revised 14 August 2012

accepted 16 August 2012

Publication Date:
27 September 2012 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In order to avoid pelvic floor injuries a caesarean section is on the one hand often requested by the pregnant women and, on the other hand, offered by obstetric staff. For both forms of delivery, comprehensive risk-benefit analyses should be carried out before deciding in favour of the surgical procedure. The present brief review summarizes the current evidence on the avoidance of pelvic floor injuries.

Zusammenfassung

Zur Vermeidung einer Beckenbodenschädigung wird die Sectio caesarea zum einen von Schwangeren eingefordert, zum anderen aber auch von Geburtshelfern angeboten. Für beide Entbindungsmodi sind die Risiken vs. die Vorteile abzuwägen, bevor die operative Entbindung favorisiert wird. Diese Kurzübersicht zeigt die derzeitige Evidenz auf, eine geburtsbedingte Beckenbodenschädigung zu vermeiden.

Key words

pelvic floor injuries - delivery method - incontinence - genital prolapse

Schlüsselwörter

Beckenbodenschädigung - Entbindungsmodus - Inkontinenz - Genitalprolaps

Supporting Information

 

  • References

  • 1 Handa V, Blomquist J, Knoepp L et al. Pelvic floor disorders 5–10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 777-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Beckmann MW, Bader W, Bechtold I et al. Finanzierung und finanzielle Probleme von Leistungen und Strukturen im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe im Jahr 2011 – allgemeine Aspekte und geburtshilfliche Versorgung. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2011; 71: 367-380
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beckmann MW, Bader W, Bechtold I. Finanzierung und finanzielle Probleme von Leistungen und Strukturen im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe im Jahr 2011 – DRG-System und stationäre Versorgung inklusive Urogynäkologie und benigner wie auch maligner gynäkologischer Operationen. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2011; 71: 497-510
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nygaard I. Vaginal birth: A relic of the past in bulldogs and women?. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 774-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ et al. Incidence and etiology of pelvic floor dysfunction and mode of delivery: an overview. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1186-1195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Womenʼs Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1160-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rortveit G, Hannestad YS, Daltveit AK et al. Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 1004-1010
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Abramov Y, Sand PK, Botros SM et al. Risk factors for female anal incontinence: new insight through the Evanston-Northwestern Twin Sisters Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 726-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Handa V. Pelvic floor disorders associated with pregnancy and childbirth (2012). Im Internet:. http://www.uptodate.com Stand: 24.04.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Leijonhufvud A, Lundholm C, Cnattingius S et al. Risk of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 70.e1-70.e6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Viktrup L, Rortveit G, Lose G. Risk of urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 248-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 MacArthur C, Glazener CM, Wilson PD et al. Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG 2006; 113: 218-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905-1911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Eason E, Labreque M, Wells G et al. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 464-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wheeler II T, Richter H. Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 474-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Thakar R, Sultan AH et al. Obstetric levator ani muscle injuries: current status. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 372-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dietz HP. Geburtsbedingtes Beckenbodentrauma. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2010; 70: 969-978
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Valsky DV, Messing B, Pomp R et al. Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 91.e1-91.e7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lavy Y, Sand P, Kaniel C et al. Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 165-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 917-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Borello-France D, Bugio KL, Richter HE et al. Pelvic floor Disorders Network. Prevalence of fecal and urinary incontinence after childbirth: the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms (CAPS) Study. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 863-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lal M, Mann CH, Callender R et al. Does cesarean delivery prevent anal incontinence?. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 305-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nelson R, Westercamp M, Furner S. A systematic review of the efficacy of cesarean section in the preservation of anal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1587-1595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Weber AM. Elective cesarean delivery: the pelvic perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50: 510-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Faltin DL, Sangalli MR, Roche B et al. Does a second delivery increase the risk of anal incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 108: 684-688
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mahony R, Behan M, OʼConnell PR et al. Effect of second vaginal delivery on anal function in patients at risk of occult anal sphincter injury after first forceps delivery. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1361-1366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner D. Perineal and anal Sphincter Trauma. London: Springer; 2007
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hay-Smith J, Mørkved S, Fairbrother KA et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4) CD007471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stafne S, Salvesen K, Romundstad P et al. Does regular exercise including pelvic floor muscle training prevent urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy? A randomized controlled trial. BJOG 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03426.x.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mason L, Roe B, Wong H et al. The role of antenatal pelvic floor muscle exercises in prevention of postpartum stress incontinence: a randomized trial. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 2777-2786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Taran-Munteanu L, Taran FA, Hosang B et al. Abdominale Sakrokolpopexie versus vaginale sakrospinale Fixation: klinische Parameter und subjektive Patienteneinschätzungen. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2011; 71: 760-766
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kemp B, Maass N, Najjari L et al. Magnetstimulation – eine zusätzliche Therapieoption beim OAB-Syndrom. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2010; 70: 580-583
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Naumann G, Kölbl H. Current developments and perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in women. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2012; 72: 202-210
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gadonneix P, Campagna G, Villet R. Pregnancy after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy – a case report. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 651-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kohorst F, Flock F, Kreienberg R et al. Pregnancy and delivery after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure: literature review and case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 10-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar