Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Effects of Intravascular Contrast Media as Assessed by Thromboelastography

Omer Iqbal; Walter Jeske; Debra Hoppensteadt; Michael Koza; Jeanine M Walenga; Jawed Fareed; Rogelio Moncada

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1313628

Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Table of Contents

Semin Thromb Hemost 1995; 21(S 04): 086-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313628

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Effects of Intravascular Contrast Media as Assessed by Thromboelastography

Omer Iqbal

,

Walter Jeske

,

Debra Hoppensteadt

,

Michael Koza

,

Jeanine M Walenga

,

Jawed Fareed

,

Rogelio Moncada

Abstract

PDF Download

PDF (1065 kb)

References

References
1 Osborne ED, Sutherland CG, Scroll Jr AJ, Rountree LG. Roentgenography of urinary tract during excretion of sodium iodide. JAMA 80: 368-373 1923;
2 Almén T. Contrast agent design: Some aspects on the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J Theor Biol 24: 216-226 1969;
3 King BF, Hartman GW, Williamson Jr B, LeRoy AJ, Hattery RR. Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 64: 976-985 1989;
4 Robertson HJF. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 162: 621-622 1987;
5 Kopko P, Smith DG, Bull BS. Thrombin generation in nonclottable mixtures of blood and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 174: 459-461 1990;
6 Grollman JH, Chi C, Astone RA. Thromboembolic complications in coronary angiography associated with the use of non-ionic contrast media. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 14: 159-164 1988;
7 Gasparetti CM, Feldman MD, Burwell LR, Angello DA, Haugh KH, Own RM, Powers ER. Influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coli Cardiol 18: 433450 1991;
8 Grines CL, Diaz C, Mickelson J. Acute thrombosis in a canine model of arterial injury: Effect of ionic versus non-ionic contrast media. Circulation 80 (Suppl 2) 411 1989;
9 Hwang MH, Piao ZE, Murdock DK, Giardina J, Pacold I. The potential risk of thrombosis during angiography using non-ionic contrast media. (Abstr.) J Am Coli Cardiol 11: 55 1988;
10 McClennan BL. Low-osmolality contrast media, premises and promises. Radiology 162: 1-8 1987;
11 Wolf GL. Safer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: How do we decide?. Radiology 154: 557-558 1986;
12 Committee on Drug and Contrast Media. The current efficacious use of water soluble contrast agents for intravascular injections. ACR Bull 44: 9-10 1988;
13 Bettman MA. Radiographic contrast agents—a perspective. (Editorial.) N Engl J Med 317: 891-893 1987;
14 Bagg MNJ, Horwitz TA, Bester L. Comparison of patient responses to high and low osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously. AJR 147: 185-187 1986;
15 Granger RG. Low osmolar contrast media. (Editorial.) Br M ed J 289: 144-145 1984;
16 Roberts CJ, Farron SC, Charney MC. How much can the NHS afford to spend to save a life or avoid a severe disability?. Lancet 1: 89-91 1985;
17 Fareed J, Walenga JM, Saravia GE, Moncada RM. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media?. Radiology 174: 321-325 1990;
18 Parvez Z, Moncada R, Fareed J, Messmore HL. Effect of nonionic contrast media (CM) on the components of coagulation and complement systems. Invest Radiol 18: 279-284 1983;
19 Rasuli P. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. (Letter.) Radiology 165: 582 1987;
20 Skalpe IO, Anke IM. Complications in cerebral angiography: A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate. Neuroradiology 25: 157-160 1983;
21 Jacobson PD, Rosenquist CJ. The introduction of low osmolar contrast agents in radiology: Medical, economic, legal, and public policy issues. JAMA 260: 1586-1592 1988;