Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2013; 34(4): 359-367
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313136
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Impact of Preoperative Bilateral Whole Breast Sonography in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Results from Two Medical Centers

Stellenwert der Sonografie beider Mammae bei Patientinnen mit invasem lobulärem Karzinom: Ergebnisse von zwei medizinischen Zentren
Y.-M. Sohn
1   Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
,
M. J. Kim
2   Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3   John Tu and Thomas Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
,
E.-K. Kim
2   Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 February 2012

26 June 2012

Publication Date:
21 September 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of bilateral whole breast sonography (BWBS) combined with mammography for the detection of additional lesions, as well as index lesions, in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to evaluate the impact of BWBS on surgical treatment and cancer staging strategies.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed mammographic and sonographic records of 97 patients with proven ILCs between November 2002 and November 2009. We evaluated the sensitivity of mammography and BWBS for the detection of additional and index lesions. We compared the impact of BWBS on surgical treatment and breast cancer staging between cases with single index lesions and with BWBS-detected additional lesions and index lesions. We compared the differences in sensitivity, surgical treatment procedures and breast cancer staging between BWBS and MRI confined to the patients underwent MRI.

Results: The overall sensitivity was 74.4 % (93/125 lesions) for mammography and 96.0 % (120/125 lesions) for BWBS (p < 0.001). The group with additional lesions detected using US alone exhibited more frequent mastectomy (p = 0.003) and higher N staging (p = 0.051) than did the group with single index lesions. Comparing the BWBS and MRI cases, there were no significant differences in lesion staging, the sensitivity of malignant foci detection (p = 0.074).

Conclusion: BWBS has a higher sensitivity than does mammography for the detection of index and additional ILC. Detection of additional malignancies using BWBS could affect which strategy is chosen for surgical treatment.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Ziel dieser Untersuchung ist die Evaluierung des Stellenwertes der umfassenden Sonografie beider Mammae („bilater whole breast sonografie, BWBS) zusammen mit einer Mammografie zur Detektion zusätzlicher maligner Läsionen bei Patienten mit invasivem lobulärem Karzinom (ILC). Dieses Vorgehen soll bezüglich der Auswirkung auf das Tumorstaging und das therapeutische Management untersucht werden.

Material und Methoden: Die Befunde von Mammografie und beidseitiger Mammasonografie von 97 Patienten mit nachgewiesenen ILCs zwischen November 2002 und November 2009 wurde retrospektiv ausgewertet. Anschließend haben wir die Sensitivität der Mammografie und der BWBS zur Feststellung von zusätzlichen Läsionen und Indexläsionen evaluiert. Die Auswirkungen der BWBS auf das chirurgische Vorgehen und die Stadieneinteilung des Mammakarrzinoms wurden für Fälle mit unilokulärem ILC und Fälle mit BWBS-entdeckten zusätzlichen Läsionen verglichen. Ferner haben wir den Stellenwert der BWSB auf das chirurgischen Vorgehen und die Stadieneinteilung des ILC bei einer Subgruppe von Patienten mit der MR-Mammografie verglichen, bei denen die MR-Mammografie auch durchgeführt worden war.

Ergebnisse: Die Sensitivität für zusätzliche Tumorläsionen betrug 74,4 % (93/125 Läsionen) für die Mammografie und 96,0 % (120/125 Läsionen) für die BWBS (p < 0,001). Die Gruppe mit alleine durch US zusätzlich entdeckte Läsionen war durch häufigere Brustamputationen (p = 0,003) und ein höheres N-Staging (p = 0,051) gekennzeichnet als die Gruppe mit singulären Läsionen eines ILC. Ein Vergleich der BWBS- und MRI-Fälle zeigte keinen signifikanten Unterschied in der Stadieneinteilung des ILC und der Sensitivität zur Detektion zusätzlicher maligner Läsionen (p = 0,074) zwischen den Methoden.

Schlussfolgerung: US (BWBS) hat eine höhere Sensitivität als die Mammografie zur Feststellung zusätzlicher maligner Läsionen bei ILC. Das hat eine Auswirkung auf das therapeutische Management dieser Patientinnen.

Key words

breast - ultrasound - mammography
 

  • References

  • 1 Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL et al. Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 325-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chapellier C, Balu-Maestro C, Bleuse A et al. Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: sonographic patterns and diagnostic value: report of 102 cases. Clin Imaging 2000; 24: 333-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Evans N, Lyons K. The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast less than 10 mm in size. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 261-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lopez JK, Bassett LW. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, US, and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2009; 29: 165-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ohta T, Tsujimoto F, Nakajima Y et al. Ultrasonographic findings of invasive lobular carcinoma differentiation of invasive lobular carcinoma from invasive ductal carcinoma by ultrasonography. Breast Cancer 2005; 12: 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Paramagul CP, Helvie MA, Adler DD. Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity. Radiology 1995; 195: 231-234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pointon KS, Cunningham DA. Ultrasound findings in pure invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: comparison with matched cases of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Breast 1999; 8: 188-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rissanen T, Tikkakoski T, Autio AL et al. Ultrasonography of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1998; 39: 285-291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al. Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1209-1216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Skaane P, Skjorten F. Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1999; 40: 369-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hanagiri T, Nozoe T, Mizukami M et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Asian J Surg 2009; 32: 76-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Intra M, Rotmensz N, Viale G et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of 143 patients with synchronous bilateral invasive breast carcinomas treated in a single institution. Cancer 2004; 101: 905-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lee JH, Park S, Park HS et al. Clinicopathological features of infiltrating lobular carcinomas comparing with infiltrating ductal carcinomas: a case control study. World J Surg Oncol 2010; 8: 34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Horn PL, Thompson WD. Risk of contralateral breast cancer: associations with factors related to initial breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128: 309-323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Albayrak ZK, Onay HK, Karatag GY et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011; 17: 232-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Selinko VL, Middleton LP, Dempsey PJ. Role of sonography in diagnosing and staging invasive lobular carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2004; 32: 323-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196: 123-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS) ultrasound. 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Hille H, Vetter M, Hackeloer BJ. The accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound as a first-line imaging method. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 160-163
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Pestalozzi BC, Zahrieh D, Mallon E et al. Distinct clinical and prognostic features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: combined results of 15 International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3006-3014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29: 32-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Madjar H, Ladner HA, Sauerbrei W et al. Preoperative staging of breast cancer by palpation, mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Berg WA, Gilbreath PL. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000; 214: 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 1991; 178: 149-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Le Gal M, Ollivier L, Asselain B et al. Mammographic features of 455 invasive lobular carcinomas. Radiology 1992; 185: 705-708
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Oberman HA et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma. Imaging features and clinical detection. Invest Radiol 1993; 28: 202-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Quan ML, Sclafani L, Heerdt AS et al. Magnetic resonance imaging detects unsuspected disease in patients with invasive lobular cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 1048-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 399-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Coombs NJ, Boyages J. Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter?. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7497-7502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pedersen L, Gunnarsdottir KA, Rasmussen BB et al. The prognostic influence of multifocality in breast cancer patients. Breast 2004; 13: 188-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R et al. Frequency and predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 723-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Weissenbacher TM, Zschage M, Janni W et al. Multicentric and multifocal versus unifocal breast cancer: is the tumor-node-metastasis classification justified?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 122: 27-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Varga D, Wockel A, Wagner J et al. Value of ultrasound in preoperative local staging in early breast cancer. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 387-392
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wang J, Kollias J, Boult M et al. Patterns of surgical treatment for women with breast cancer in relation to age. Breast J 2009; 16: 60-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003; 98: 468-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 McGhan LJ, Wasif N, Gray RJ et al. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best?. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 255-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG et al. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 107: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Molleran V, Mahoney MC. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 171-185, vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shin JH, Han BK, Choe YH et al. Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8: 475-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1227-1232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 119: 415-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 563-571
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Jones K, Glazebrook K, Magut M et al. Incidence of Echogenic Sonographic Appearance in Pure Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: A20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Brem RF, Ioffe M, Rapelyea JA et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 379-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Luciani ML, Pediconi F, Telesca M et al. Incidental enhancing lesions found on preoperative breast MRI: management and role of second-look ultrasound. Radiol Med 2011; 116: 886-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 994-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS:magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Erguvan-Dogan B, Whitman GJ, Kushwaha AC et al. BI-RADS-MRI: a primer. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W152-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Eby PR, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL et al. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 861-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Michael M, Garzoli E, Reiner CS. Mammography, Sonography and MRI for Detection and Characterization of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Breast Dis 2009; 30: 21-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Morrow M, Keeney K, Scholtens D et al. Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy: the importance of lobular histology. Cancer 2006; 106: 2563-2568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 290-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Koehler KE, Ohlinger R. Sensitivity and specificity of preoperative ultrasonography for diagnosing nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 393-399
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Drudi FM, Cantisani V, Gnecchi M et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Examination of the Breast: A Literature Review. Ultraschall in Med 2012; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar