Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(03): 207-213
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312627
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Molecular Adaptations to Concurrent Training

Autoren

  • E. O. de Souza

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • V. Tricoli

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • H. Roschel

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • P. C. Brum

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • A.V. N. Bacurau

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • J.C. B. Ferreira

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    6   Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
  • M. S. Aoki

    2   School of Arts, Sciences, Humanities, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • M. Neves-Jr

    3   School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • A. Y. Aihara

    4   Diagnósticos das Américas S/A (DASA), SP, Brazil
  • A. da Rocha Correa Fernandes

    5   Department of Radiology of Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • C. Ugrinowitsch

    1   Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 17. April 2012

Publikationsdatum:
08. Oktober 2012 (online)

Abstract

This study investigated the chronic effects of concurrent training (CT) on morphological and molecular adaptations. 37 men (age=23.7±5.5 year) were divided into 4 groups: interval (IT), strength (ST) and concurrent (CT) training and a control group (C) and underwent 8 weeks of training. Maximum strength (1RM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) were evaluated before and after training. Muscle samples were obtained before the training program and 48 h after the last training session. VO2max improved in 5±0.95% and 15±1.3% (pre- to post-test) in groups CT and IT, respectively, when compared to C. Time to exhaustion (TE) improved from pre- to post-test when compared to C (CT=6.1±0.58%; IT=8.3±0.88%; ST=3.2±0.66%). 1RM increased from pre-to post-test only in ST and CT groups (ST=18.5±3.16%; CT=17.6±3.01%). Similarly, ST and CT groups increased quadriceps CSA from pre-to post-test (6.2±1.4%; 7.8±1.66%). The p70S6K1 total protein content increased after CT. The ST group showed increased Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 (45.0±3.3%) whereas AMPK phosphorylation at Thr172 increased only in IT group, (100±17.6%). In summary, our data suggest that despite the differences in molecular adaptations between training regimens, CT did not blunt muscle strength and hypertrophy increments when compared with ST.