The Effect of Wheel Size on Mobility Performance in Wheelchair Athletes

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of different wheel sizes, with fixed gear ratios, on maximal effort mobility performance in wheelchair athletes. 13 highly trained wheelchair basketball players, grouped by classification level, performed a battery of 3 field tests in an adjustable wheelchair with 3 different wheel sizes (0.59 m, 0.61 m and 0.65 m). Performance was assessed using the time taken to perform drills, with velocity and acceleration data also collected via a wheelchair velocometer. 20 m sprint time improved in the 0.65 m condition (5.58±0.43 s, P=0.029) compared with 0.59 m (5.72±0.40 s). Acceleration performance over the first 2 (P=0.299) and 3 (P=0.145) pushes was not statistically influenced by wheel size. However, the peak velocities reached were greater in the 0.65 m condition (4.77±0.46 m∙s^− 1, P=0.078, Effect Size [ES]=0.63) compared with 0.59 m (4.61±0.40 m∙s^− 1). Impact velocity, calculated as the change in velocity from the onset of a push to the following impact peak, to define coupling performance, was also significantly improved in 0.65 m wheels (0.14±0.14 m∙s^− 1, P=0.006) than 0.59 m wheels (0.05±0.10 m∙s^− 1). The time taken to complete the linear mobility (P=0.630) and the agility drill (P=0.505) were not affected by wheel size. Finally, no significant interactions existed between wheel size, classification and any performance measure. To conclude, larger 0.65 m wheels improved the maximal sprinting performance of highly trained wheelchair basketball players, without any negative effects on acceleration or manoeuvrability. Improvements in sprinting were attributed to a combination of the reduced drag forces experienced and improvements in coupling thought to be due to the lower angular velocities of the wheel/hand-rim when developing high wheelchair velocities in larger wheels.

Key words

wheelchair configuration - sports performance - wheelchair propulsion - field tests - wheelchair athletes

• References

• 1 Bloxham LA, Bell GJ, Bhambhani Y, Steadward RD. Time motion analysis and physiological profile of Canadian world cup wheelchair basketball players. Sports Med Train Rehabil 2001; 10: 183-198
• 2 Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159
• 3 Costa GB, Rubio MP, Belloch SL, Soriano PP. Case study: effect of handrim diameter on performance in a Paralympic wheelchair athlete. Adapt Phys Act Quart 2009; 26: 352-363
• 4 Coutts KD. Kinematics of sports wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990; 27: 21-26
• 5 Coutts KD. Dynamics of wheelchair basketball. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 231-234
• 6 Faupin A, Campillo P, Weissland T, Gorce P, Thevenon A. The effects of rear wheel camber on the mechanical parameters during the wheelchair sprinting of handibasketball athletes. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41: 421-428
• 7 Gayle WG, Pohlman RL, Glaser RM, Davis GM. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to arm crank and wheelchair exercise using various handrims in male paraplegics. Res Q Exerc Sport 1990; 61: 224-232
• 8 Groot de S, Veeger HEJ, Hollander AP, Woude van der LHV. Adaptations in physiology and technique during the initial phase of learning manual wheelchair propulsion. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 504-510
• 9 Guo LY, Su FC, An KN. Effect of handrim diameter on manual wheelchair propulsion: mechanical energy and power flow analysis. Clin Biomech 2006; 21: 107-115
• 10 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
• 11 Hintzy-Cloutier F, Tordi N, Rouillon JD, Belli A. The influence of within-cycle pattern characteristics on mechanical parameters developed during wheelchair sprinting. Sci Sports 2002; 17: 128-131
• 12 Hutzler Y, Grunze M, Kaiser R. Physiological and dynamic responses to maximal velocity wheelchair ergometry. Adapt Phys Activ Q 1995; 12: 344-361
• 13 Kauzlarich JJ, Thacker JG. Wheelchair tire rolling resistance and fatigue. J Rehabil Res Dev 1985; 22: 25-41
• 14 Mason BS, Porcellato L, Woude van der LHV, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. A qualitative examination of wheelchair configuration for optimal mobility performance in wheelchair sports: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 141-149
• 15 Mason BS, van der Woude LHV, de Groot S, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. The effects of camber on the ergonomics of propulsion in wheelchair athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 319-326
• 16 Mason BS, Woude van der LHV, Tolfrey K, Lenton JL, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Effects of wheel and hand-rim size on sub-maximal propulsion in wheelchair athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 126-134
• 17 Mason BS, Woude van der LHV, Tolfrey K, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. The effects of rear-wheel camber on maximal effort mobility performance in wheelchair athletes. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 199-204
• 18 Moss AD, Fowler NE, Tolfrey VL. A telemetry-based velocometer to measure wheelchair velocity. J Biomech 36: 253-257
• 19 Roeleveld K, Lute E, Veeger HEJ, Woude van der LHV, Gwinn T. Power output and technique of wheelchair athletes. Adapt Phys Activ Q 1994; 11: 71-85
• 20 Sanderson DJ, Sommer HJ. Kinematic features of wheelchair propulsion. J Biomech 1985; 18: 423-429
• 21 Sporner ML, Grindle GG, Kelleher A, Teodorski EE, Cooper R, Cooper RA. Quantification of activity during wheelchair basketball and rugby at the National Veterans Wheelchair Games: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33: 210-217
• 22 Tweedy S, Diaper N. Introduction to wheelchair sport. In: Goosey-Tolfrey V. ed. Wheelchair Sport: A Complete Guide for Athletes, Coaches and Teachers. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2010: 3-28
• 23 Vanlandewijck YC, Daly D, Spaepen A, Theisen D, Petre L. Biomechanics in handrim wheelchair propulsion: wheelchair-user interface adjustment for basketball. Educ Phys Train Sport 1999; 4: 50-53
• 24 Vanlandewijck Y, Theisen D, Daly D. Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports. Sports Med 2001; 31: 339-367
• 25 Veeger HEJ, Woude van der LHV, Rozendal RH. Within-cycle characteristics of the wheelchair push in sprinting on a wheelchair ergometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 264-271
• 26 Veeger HEJ, Woude van der LHV, Rozendaal RH. Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 100-107
• 27 Woude van der LHV, Veeger HEJ, Rozendal RH, van Ingen Schenau GJ, Rooth F, Nierop van P. Wheelchair racing: effects of rim diameter and speed on physiology and technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: 492-500
• 28 Woude van der LHV, Bakker WH, Elkhuizen JW, Veeger HEJ, Gwinn T. Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross sectional analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77: 222-234