Ventral Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse and Obstructed Defecation

John Cullen; Jorge M. Rosselli; Brooke H. Gurland

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1301757

Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, Table of Contents

Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2012; 25(01): 034-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1301757

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Ventral Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse and Obstructed Defecation

Authors

John Cullen

¹Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jorge M. Rosselli

¹Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Brooke H. Gurland

¹Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Abstract

Ventral rectopexy has gained popularity in Europe to treat full-thickness rectal external and internal prolapse. This procedure has been shown to achieve acceptable anatomic results with low recurrence rates, few complications, and improvements of both constipation and fecal incontinence. The authors review the principles, techniques, and outcomes of ventral rectopexy.

Keywords

anterior ventral rectopexy - rectal prolapse

Full Text

References

References
1 Loygue J, Nordlinger B, Cunci O, Malafosse M, Huguet C, Parc R. Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Report of 257 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27 (6) 356-359
2 D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (11) 1500-1505
3 D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (12) 1919-1923
4 Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (6) 526-532
5 Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (2) 97-104
6 Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140 (1) 63-73
7 Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 2005; 94 (3) 207-210
8 González-Argenté FX, Jain A, Nogueras JJ, Davila GW, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44 (7) 920-926
9 Ripstein CB, Lanter B. Etiology and surgical therapy of massive prolapse of the rectum. Ann Surg 1963; 157: 259-264
10 Brodén B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968; 11 (5) 330-347
11 Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989; 30 (12) 1737-1749
12 Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A. Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40 (7) 817-820
13 Choi JS, Hwang YH, Salum MR , et al. Outcome and management of patients with large rectoanal intussusception. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96 (3) 740-744
14 Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R, Mortensen NJ, Roe AM. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34 (1) 41-46
15 Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (2) 452 , author reply 453
16 Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. The assessment and management of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocoele, and enterocoele in adults. BMJ 2011; 342: c7099
17 Sagar PM, Thekkinkattil DK, Heath RM, Woodfield J, Gonsalves S, Landon CR. Feasibility and functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy for combined vaginal and rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (9) 1414-1420
18 Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD ; Standards Practice Task Force of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (11) 1339-1346
19 Dellinger EP. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures: the whole is greater than the parts. Future Microbiol 2010; 5 (12) 1781-1785
20 Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (6) 504-512
21 Draaisma WA, van Eijck MM, Vos J, Consten EC. Lumbar discitis after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26 (2) 255-256
22 Rajamaheswari N, Agarwal S, Seethalakshmi K.. Lumbosacral spondylodiscitis: an unusual complication of abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2011; September 2 [Epub ahead of print]
23 Salman MM, Hancock AL, Hussein AA, Hartwell R. Lumbosacral spondylodiscitis: an unreported complication of sacrocolpopexy using mesh. BJOG 2003; 110 (5) 537-538
24 Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (3) 342-346
25 Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (11) 1825-1830