Evid Based Spine Care J 2012; 3(1): 45-52
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298600
Systematic review
© AOSpine International Stettbachstrasse 6 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland

Can clinical and radiological findings predict surgery for lumbar disc herniation? A systematic literature review

Andrew P White
1   Harvard Medical School, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
,
James Harrop
2   Departments of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Jefferson Medical College Philadelphia, PA, USA
,
Joseph R Dettori
3   Spectrum Research Inc, Tacoma, WA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 May 2012 (online)

ABSTRACT

Study design: Systematic review.

Objective or clinical question: What clinical and radiological findings in patients with lumbar-herniated nucleus pulposus can serve as predictors of surgical intervention?

Methods: Articles published between January 1975 and August 2011 were systematically reviewed using Pubmed, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases, and bibliographies of key articles. Each article was subject to quality rating and was analyzed by two independent reviewers.

Results: From 123 citations, 21 underwent full-text review. Four studies met inclusion criteria. Only baseline disability as measured by the Roland Disability Index (RDI) or the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was consistently associated with a greater likelihood of having discectomy surgery across multiple studies. With the current literature, we were not able to find an association between surgery and several characteristics including smoking status, body mass index, neurological deficit, positive straight leg testing, and level of herniation.

Conclusions: From the limited data available, it appears that individual radiographic and clinical features are not able to predict the likelihood of surgical intervention. Higher baseline disability measurements (Oswestry and Roland) did correlate, however, with surgical treatment.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Buttermann GR. 2004; Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (4) 670-679
  • 2 Peul WC, Brand R, Thomeer RT et al. 2008; Improving prediction of ”inevitable” surgery during non-surgical treatment of sciatica. Pain 138 (3) 571-576
  • 3 Weber H. 1983; Lumbar disc herniation: a controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8 (2) 131-140
  • 4 Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al. 2006; Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 296: 2441-2450
  • 5 Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK et al. 2009; Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34: 1066
  • 6 Radcliff KE, Rihn J, Hilibrand A et al. 2011; Does the duration of symptoms in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis affect outcomes? Analysis of the spine outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 (25) 2197-2110
  • 7 Osterman H, Seitsalo S, Karppinen J et al. 2006; Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 (21) 2409-2414
  • 8 McMorland G, Suter E, Casha S et al. 2010; Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 33 (8) 576-584
  • 9 Chapman JR, Hanson BP, Dettori JR et al. 2007. Spine Outcomes Measures and Instruments. 1st ed. Stuttgart New York: Thieme;