Evid Based Spine Care J 2012; 03(01): 027-034
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298598
Original research
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical and radiological association with positive lumbar discography in patients with chronic low back pain

William Omar Contreras López
1   Functional Neurosurgery Department, Universitäts Klinikum, Freiburg, Germany.
,
Emiliano Neves Vialle
2   Spine Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Cajuru, Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil
,
Carolina Casas Anillo
3   Rosario University, Bogota, Colombia
,
Mauricio Guzmao
2   Spine Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Cajuru, Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil
,
Luiz Roberto Gomes Vialle
2   Spine Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Cajuru, Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 May 2012 (online)

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: To find out (1) if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings associated with positive discography in patients with lumbar discogenic pain are caused by degenerative disc disease (DDD). (2) If clinical risk factors associated with positive discography in patients with lumbar discogenic pain are caused by DDD.

Methods: Thirty-three discographies were performed in 20 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). All examinations were performed in the lumbar spine between L3 and S1. Patient assessment consisted of a clinical and radiological examination through a protocol that contained data on the history, visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), functional questionnaire (Oswestry), and MRI findings. Discography was considered positive using the Walsh's criteria. We examined the association between MRI and clinical findings with positive discography using logistic regression.

Results: Fourteen discographies (42%) were positive and 19 (58%) were negative. The mean age of patients with positive discography was 40.7 years (range, 25–56 years) and negative discography 43.1 years (range, 30–55 years). Men had a positive discography rate of 43.5% and women 40%. Patients with LBP had reduced odds of a positive discography compared with those with LBP and sciatica (OR = .5; 95% CI: 0.1–2.7); however, this association was not statistically significant. Patients with more than four previous episodes of pain versus patients with one to four episodes had greater odds of a positive discography (OR = 3.8; 95% CI: 0.07–184); but this association was not statistically significant. Patients with various pathologies on MRI had greater odds of a positive discography; however, these associations were not statistically significant either.

Conclusions: Patients with a chief complaint of LBP associated with sciatica, with more than four episodes of previous LBP exacerbations and the presence of a high intensity zone (HIZ) on MRI have a higher rate of positive discography. These findings are not statistically significant, probably due to a small sample size. During discography, we found the end point resistance to be more prevalent in asymptomatic discs.

 
  • References

  • 1 Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD. Lumbar discography: position statement from the North American Spine Society Diagnostic and Therapeutic Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20 (18) 2048-2059
  • 2 Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B , et al. False-positive findings on lumbar discography: reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24 (23) 2542-2547
  • 3 Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Gundry CR , et al. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21 (1) 79-86
  • 4 O'Neill C, Kurgansky M. Subgroups of positive discs on discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29 (19) 2134-2139
    • Reference Editorial Perspective

    • 1 Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B , et al. 1999; False-positive findings on lumbar discography: reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 (23) 2542-2547