Trans-Lamina Terminalis Approach to Third Ventricle using Supraorbital Craniotomy: Technique Description and Literature Review for Outcome Comparison with Anterior, Lateral and Trans-Sphenoidal Corridors

Abstract

Background:

The trans-lamina terminalis approach has been described to remove third ventricular tumors. Various surgical corridors for this approach include anterior (via bifrontal craniotomy), anterolateral (via supra-orbital craniotomy), lateral (via pterional craniotomy) and trans-sphenoidal corridors. Supra-orbital craniotomy offers a minimally invasive access for resection of third ventricular tumors.

Materials and Methods:

The trans-lamina terminalis technique through a supra-orbital craniotomy is described. Also, a literature review of clinical outcome data was performed for the comparison of different surgical corridors (anterior, antero-lateral, lateral, and trans-sphenoidal).

Results:

The operative steps and anatomic landmarks for supra-orbital craniotomy are discussed, along with 3 representative cases and respective outcomes. Gross total resection was achieved in 2 patients, and one patient required reoperation for recurrence. Based on the current literature, the clinical outcomes after supra-orbital craniotomy for trans-lamina terminalis approach are comparable to other surgical corridors.

Conclusions:

The supra-orbital craniotomy for trans-lamina terminalis approach is a valid surgical choice for third ventricular tumors. The major strengths of this approach include minimal brain retraction and direct end-on view; however, the long working distance is a major limitation. The clinical outcomes are comparable to other surgical corridors. Sound understanding of major strengths, limitations, and strategies for complication avoidance is necessary for its safe and effective application.

Key words

key-hole approach - minimally invasive surgery - outcome - neurooncology

• References

• 1 King TT. Removal of intraventricular craniopharyngiomas through the lamina terminalis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1979; 45: 277-286
• 2 Pascual JM, Gonzalez-Llanos F, Barrios L et al. Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas: topographical classification and surgical approach selection based on an extensive overview. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146: 785-802
• 3 Behari S, Banerji D, Mishra A et al. Intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngiomas: report on six cases and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2003; 60: 245-252 discussion 243–252
• 4 Maira G, Anile C, Colosimo C et al. Craniopharyngiomas of the third ventricle: trans-lamina terminalis approach. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 857-863 discussion 855–863
• 5 Shi XE, Wu B, Fan T et al. Craniopharyngioma: surgical experience of 309 cases in China. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008; 110: 151-159
• 6 Van Effenterre R, Boch AL. Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 3-11
• 7 Zhang YQ, Ma ZY, Wu ZB et al. Radical resection of 202 pediatric craniopharyngiomas with special reference to the surgical approaches and hypothalamic protection. Pediatr Neurosurg 2008; 44: 435-443
• 8 Charalampaki P, Filippi R, Welschehold S et al. Tumors of the lateral and third ventricle: removal under endoscope-assisted keyhole conditions. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 302-311 discussion 302–311
• 9 Dehdashti AR, de Tribolet N. Frontobasal interhemispheric trans-lamina terminalis approach for suprasellar lesions. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 418-424 discussion 418-424
• 10 Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Paulus W et al. Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 237-250
• 11 Hori T, Kawamata T, Amano K et al. Anterior interhemispheric approach for 100 tumors in and around the anterior third ventricle. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 65-74
• 12 Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O, Aydin S et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the suprasellar area: anatomic considerations  −  part 1. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 24-33 discussion 24–33
• 13 Cavallo LM, Prevedello DM, Solari D et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 578-589
• 14 Coppens JR, Couldwell WT. Staged use of the transsphenoidal approach to resect superior third ventricular craniopharyngiomas. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2010; 53: 40-43
• 15 de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM et al. Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 219-227 discussion 228
• 16 Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH et al. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 715-728
• 17 Kitano M, Taneda M. Extended transsphenoidal surgery for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: infrachiasmatic radical resection combined with or without a suprachiasmatic trans-lamina terminalis approach. Surg Neurol 2009; 71: 290-298 discussion 298
• 18 Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 242-255 discussion 242-255
• 19 Perneczky A, van Lindert E. Keyhole Concepts in Neurosurgery: With Endoscope-assisted Microsurgery and Case Studies. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1999
• 20 Spena G, Fasel J, Tribolet N et al. Subfrontal endoscopic fenestration of lamina terminalis: an anatomical study. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2008; 51: 319-323
• 21 Abdou MS, Cohen AR. Endoscopic surgery of the third ventricle: the subfrontal trans-lamina terminalis approach. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2000; 43: 208-211
• 22 Gore PA, Nakaji P, Deshmukh V et al. Synchronous endoscopy and microsurgery: a novel strategy to approach complex ventricular lesions. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 485-489
• 23 Lan Q, Dong J, Huang Q. Minimally invasive keyhole approaches for removal of tumors of the third ventricle. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006; 119: 1444-1450
• 24 Hassaneen W, Suki D, Salaskar AL et al. Immediate morbidity and mortality associated with transcallosal resection of tumors of the third ventricle. J Clin Neurosci 2010; 17: 830-836
• 25 Ulm AJ, Russo A, Albanese E et al. Limitations of the transcallosal transchoroidal approach to the third ventricle. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 600-609
• 26 Shirane R, Hayashi T, Tominaga T. Fronto-basal interhemispheric approach for craniopharyngiomas extending outside the suprasellar cistern. Child’s Nerv Syst 2005; 21: 669-678
• 27 Suzuki J, Katakura R, Mori T. Interhemispheric approach through the lamina terminalis to tumors of the anterior part of the third ventricle. Surg Neurol 1984; 22: 157-163
• 28 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh V, Nakaji P et al. An anatomical evaluation of the mini-supraorbital approach and comparison with standard craniotomies. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: ONS212-ONS220 discussion ONS220
• 29 Czirjak S, Szeifert GT. Surgical experience with frontolateral keyhole craniotomy through a superciliary skin incision. Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 145-149 discussion 149–150
• 30 Yasargil MG, Abdulrauf SI. Surgery of intraventricular tumors. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 1029-1040 discussion 1021–1040
• 31 Cavalcanti DD, Garcia-Gonzalez U, Agrawal A et al. Quantitative anatomic study of the transciliary supraorbital approach: benefits of additional orbital osteotomy?. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 205-210
• 32 de Divitiis O, Angileri FF, d’Avella D et al. Microsurgical anatomic features of the lamina terminalis. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 563-569 discussion 569–570
• 33 Menovsky T, De Vries J, Wurzer JA et al. Intraoperative ventricular puncture during supraorbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 485-486
• 34 Liu JK, Christiano LD, Gupta G et al. Surgical nuances for removal of retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas via the transbasal subfrontal translamina terminalis approach. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E6