Klin Padiatr 2011; 223 - A17
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1292598

Identification of Two Molecular and Clinical Distinct Entities of Posterior Fossa Ependymoma

H Witt 1, 2, SC Mack 3, 4, M Ryzhova 5, S Bender 1, 2, M Sill 6, R Isserlin 7, A Benner 6, T Hielscher 6, T Milde 2, 8, M Remke 1, 2, DTW Jones 1, PA Northcott 3, 4, L Garzia 3, KC Bertrand 3, 4, A Wittmann 1, A von Deimling 9, 10, AE Kulozik 2, O Witt 2, 8, GD Bader 7, JT Rutka 3, 4, P Lichter 1, A Korshunov 7, 8, MD Taylor 3, 4, SM Pfister 1, 2
  • 1Division Molecular Genetics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 3Division of Neurosurgery, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumor Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 5Department of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
  • 6Division Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 7Department of Molecular Genetics, Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 8Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 9Department of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 10Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

Ependymoma is the third most common brain tumor in children, and remains incurable for as many as 45% of patients even after therapy currently consisting of maximal safe resection and radiotherapy. Despite the histological similarity of ependymomas from throughout the neuraxis, the disease likely comprises multiple independent entities, each with a distinct molecular pathogenesis.

We examined two non-overlapping cohorts of 102 and 75 ependymomas by mRNA expression profiling, on two different array platforms (Affymetrix Exon 1.0 ST, Agilent 4×44K). Multiple statistical clustering methods (unsupervised consensus NMF and consensus HCL) consistently revealed three major subgroups, including two subgroups of posterior fossa (PF) ependymoma in both data sets. Subgroup-specific chromosome aberrations of PF tumors were detected by aCGH. To identify biological signaling pathways distinguishing PF subgroups we performed gene set enrichment analysis visualized by Cytoscape. Most significant subgroup markers were selected by Goeman's global test statistic. Identified subgroup markers could be validated by immunohistochemical staining of 265 PF ependymomas on a tissue microarray.

We identified two subgroups (group A and group B) of PF ependymoma, which are demographically, transcriptionally, genetically, and clinically distinct ependymoma entities. Group A patients are younger, have laterally located tumors with a balanced genome, and are much more likely to exhibit recurrence, secondary metastasis, and death as compared to group B patients. The identification of two distinct subgroups of PF ependymoma, and markers applicable for their clinical distinction, will allow better prognostication of individual cases, and stratification in future ependymoma clinical trials.