A-FROM in Action at the Aphasia Institute

ABSTRACT

Aphasia centers are in an excellent position to contribute to the broad definition of health by the World Health Organization: the ability to live life to its full potential. An expansion of this definition by the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) forms the basis for a user-friendly and ICF-compatible framework for planning interventions that ensure maximum real-life outcome and impact for people with aphasia and their families. This article describes Living with Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measurement and its practical application to aphasia centers in the areas of direct service, outcome measurement, and advocacy and awareness. Examples will be drawn from the Aphasia Institute in Toronto. A case will be made for all aphasia centers to use the ICF or an adaptation of it to further the work of this sector and strengthen its credibility.

KEYWORDS

Aphasia - aphasia centers - ICF - A-FROM - intervention

REFERENCES

• 1 World Health Organization (WHO) .International Classification for Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. 10
• 2 van der Gaag A, Smith L, Davis S et al.. Therapy and support services for people with long-term stroke and aphasia and their relatives: a six-month follow-up study.  Clin Rehabil. 2005;  19 (4) 372-380
• 3 Lyon J G, Cariski D, Keisler L et al.. Communication partners: enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings.  Aphasiology. 1997;  11 693-708
• 4 Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A et al.. Counting what counts: a framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention.  Aphasiology. 2007;  22 258-280
• 5 Chapey R, Duchan J, Elman R, Garcia L, Kagan A, Lyon J, Simmons-Mackie N. (LPAA Project Group) .Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001: 235-245
• 6 Katz R C, Hallowell B, Code C et al.. A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices.  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;  35 (2) 303-314
• 7 Robbins A. The Success Cycle. 2010. Available at: http://www.tonyrobbins.com/images/products/The-Success-Cycle.png Accessed February 14, 2011
• 8 Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners (lead article in Clinical Forum).  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 816-830
• 9 Kagan A, Black S E, Duchan F J, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;  44 (3) 624-638
• 10 Elman R J, Bernstein-Ellis E. Psychosocial aspects of group communication treatment. Preliminary findings.  Semin Speech Lang. 1999;  20 (1) 65-71 quiz 71-72
• 11 Elman R J, Bernstein-Ellis E. The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;  42 (2) 411-419
• 12 Simmons-Mackie N, Code C, Armstrong E, Stiegler L, Elman R J. What is aphasia? Results of an international survey.  Aphasiology. 2002;  16 837-848
• 13 Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A, O'Neill Christie C, Huijbregts M, McEwen S, Willems J. Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: implementing sustainable health care systems change.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 39-66