Planta Med 2011; 77 - PL95
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1282744

Antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content of Stachys aucheri endemic plant to Persia

F Namjooyan 1, M Azemi 1, H Hejazi 1, M Soltani 2
  • 1Medicinal Plant Research Center, Pharmacognosy Department, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • 2Medicinal Plant Research Center Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Oxidation is essential to many living organisms for the production of energy to fuel biological processes. However, oxygen-centered free radicals and other reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are continuously, produced in vivo, result in cell death and tissue damage. Anti-oxidants are vital substances which possess the ability to protect the body from damage caused by free radical induced oxidative stress 1. Hence, compounds especially from natural sources capable of protecting against ROS mediated damage may have potential application in prevention and/or curing of diseases. The phenolic compounds in herbs act as antioxidants due to their redox properties. According to the studiese about antioxidant capacity of others species of Stachys, Stachys aucheri Benth. that has not yet been studied was choosed. Total extract of aerial parts was tested by FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) and DPPH2 (1,1-diphenyl -2-picrylhydrazyl) methods. Quantitation of total phenolic content, Folin Ciocalteu method was used. DPPH IC50 (an antioxidant concentration which is capable to inhibit 50% of generated DPPH free radicals) in DPPH method and, EC1 (antioxidant concentration which can change the absorption equal to one mM of Fe2+) in FRAP method and, Total phenolic (equal mg gallic acid) per 100g herb were used for expression of the results. IC50 of hydroalcoholic extract was1.20mg/ml and EC1, was 14.21 mmol Fe 2+ equal per 100g of herb powder. Results show that this plant is good antioxidant candidate to be used in Food industry and as neutriceutical.

References: 1. Srinivasa K e al. (2010) Food and Chemical Toxicology 48: 729–732

2. Dejian H et al. (2005)J Agric Food Chem 53: 1841–1856