Download PDF
Der Klinikarzt 2011; 40(4): 176-184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280620
Schwerpunkt

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Differenzialdiagnostik der linksventrikulären Hypertrophie – Abgrenzung und Konsequenzen für Prognose und Therapie

Differential diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy – Limitations and consequences for prognosis and therapyJohannes Schwab1 , Matthias Pauschinger1
  • 1Medizinische Klinik 8 – Kardiologie, Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Nürnberg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 May 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die linksventrikuläre Hypertrophie kann die Folge zahlreicher Krankheitsentitäten sein. Entscheidend in der Diagnostik ist die Abgrenzung der primären Myokardhypertrophie von den sekundären Hypertrophieformen, da sich hieraus weitreichende Konsequenzen für die Prognose und Therapie der einzelnen Erkrankungen ergeben. Die hypertrophe Kardiomyopathie erfordert eine besonders sorgfältige Diagnostik hinsichtlich der Primärprävention des plötzlichen Herztodes, zumal hier vor allem ein jüngeres Patientenkollektiv betroffen ist. Neben der Anamnese, der Auskultation, dem Elektrokardiogramm und der 2D-Echokardiografie sind so weitere Verfahren wie die Gewebedopplerechokardiografie, die Endomyokardbiopsie sowie die Kontrast-CMR-Untersuchung unverzichtbare Elemente in der differenzierten Diagnostik der linksventrikulären Hypertrophie.

Left ventricular hypertrophy can be a sequel of numerous clinical entities. Decisive for the diagnosis is the delineation of primary myocardial hypertrophy from secondary forms of hypertrophy since this has far-reaching consequences for the prognosis of and therapy for the individual diseases. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in particular requires an especially careful diagnosis with regard to the prevention of sudden cardiac death, above all because mainly younger patient collectives are concerned. Besides the case history, ausculation, electrocardiograhy and 2D echo cardiography, further procedures such as tissue Doppler echo cardiography, endomyocardial biopsy as well as contrast-enhanced cardiavascular MRI are indispensable elements in the differential diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Key words

left ventricular hypertrophy - differential diagnosis - hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - sudden cardiac death - electrocardiogram - tissue Doppler echo cardiography - endomyocardial biopsy

Literatur

  • 1 Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C, Sanderson JE et al.. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology.  Eur Heart J. 2007;  28 2539-2550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Klingbeil AU, Schneider M, Martus P et al.. A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.  Am J Med. 2003;  115 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K et al.. Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic review.  J Hypertension. 2004;  22 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD et al.. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study.  Ann Intern Med. 1988;  108 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Murphy ML, Thenabadu PN, De Soyza N et al.. Sensitivity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophic according to type of cardiac disease.  Am J Cardiol. 1985;  55 545-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cameron JS, Myerburg RJ, Wong SS et al.. Electrophysiologic consequences of chronic experimentally induced left ventricular pressure overload.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;  2 481-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirivis DM et al.. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for standardization and interpretation of electrocardiogram.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;  53 992-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ et al.. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: The Framinham heart study.  Am J Cardiol. 1987;  59 956-960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tschöpe C, Kasner M, Westermann D et al.. The role of NT-proBNP in the diagnostics of isolated diastolic dysfunction: correlation with echocardiographic and invasive measurements.  Eur Heart J. 2005;  26 2277-2284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lubien E, DeMaria A, Krishnaswamy P et al.. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide in detecting diastolic dysfunction: comparsion with Doppler velocity recordings.  Circulation. 2002;  105 595-601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG et al.. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?.  Eur Heart J. 2000;  21 1295-1297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Germans T, Nijveldt R, Brouwer WP et al.. The role of cardiac resonance imaging in differentiating the underlying causes of left ventricular hypertrophy.  Neth Heart J. 2010;  18 135-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pelliccia A, Maron BJ, Spataro A et al.. The upper limit of physiologic cardiac hypertrophy in highly trained elite athletes.  N Engl J Med. 1991;  324 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pluim BM, Zwinderman AH, van der Laarse A et al.. The athlete's heart. A meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function.  Circulation. 2000;  101 336-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Scharhag J, Schneider G, Urhausen A et al.. Athlete's heart. Right and left ventricular mass and function in male endurance athletes and untrained individuals determined by magnetic resonance imaging.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;  40 1856-1863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pelliccia A, Culasso F, Di Paolo FM et al.. Physiologic left ventricular cavity dilatation in elite athletes.  Ann Intern med. 1999;  130 23-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pellicia A, Spataro A, Caselli G et al.. Absence of left ventricular wall thickening in athletes engaged in intense power training.  Am J Cardiol. 1993;  72 1048-1054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Maron BJ. Distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart physiological remodelling: clinical significance, diagnostic strategies and implications for preparticipation screening.  Br J Sports Med. 2009;  43 649-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C et al.. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy.  Am J Cardiol. 1996;  78 197-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM et al.. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA-Study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults.  Circulation. 1995;  15 785-789
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Richard P, Charron P, Carrier L et al.. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy.  Circulation. 2003;  107 2227-2232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Maron BJ, Niimura H, Casey SA et al.. Development of left ventricular hypertrophic cardiomyopathy caused by cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene mutations.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;  38 315-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Maron MS, Olivotto I, Zenovich AG et al.. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is predominantly a disease of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.  Circulation. 2006;  114 2232-2239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moon JC, Fisher NG, McKenna WJ et al.. Detection of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with non-diagnostic echocardiography.  Heart. 2004;  90 645-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Moon JC, McKenna WJ, McCrohon JA et al.. Toward clinical risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;  41 1561-1567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Maron BJ, McKenna WJ, Danielson GK et al.. ACC/ESC clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;  42 1687-1713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ardehali H, Qasim A, Cappola T et al.. Endomyocardial biopsy plays a role in diagnosing patients with unexplained cardiomyopathy.  Am Heart J. 2004;  147 919-923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.  Sem Hematol. 1995;  32 45-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rahman JE, Helou EF, Gelzer-Bell R et al.. Noninvasive diagnosis of biopsy-proven cardiac amyloidosis.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;  43 410-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK et al.. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis.  Circulation. 2005;  111 186-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vogelsberg H, Mahrholdt H, Deluigi CC et al.. Cardiac magnetic resonance in clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;  51 1022-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sachdev B, Takenaka T, Teraguchi H et al.. Prevalence of Anderson-Fabry disease in male patients with late onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.  Circulation. 2002;  105 1407-1411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Moon JC, Sheppard M, Reed E et al.. The histological basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a patient with Anderson-Fabry disease.  J Cardiovasc Magn reson. 2006;  8 479-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bertoni AG, Goff Jr. DC, Jr, D'Agostino Jr. RB et al.. Diabetic cardiomyopathy and subclinical cardiovascular disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).  Diabets Care. 2006;  29 588-594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mark PB, Johnston N, Groenning BA et al.. Redefinition of uremic cardiomyopathy by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.  Kidney Int. 2006;  69 1839-1845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenz

Dr. med. Johannes Schwab

Medizinische Klinik 8 – Kardiologie Klinikum Nürnberg

Breslauer Straße 201

90471 Nürnberg

Fax: 0911/3987748

Email: johannes.schwab@klinikum-nuernberg.de

      >