Semin Speech Lang 2011; 32(2): 159-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277718
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Perceptual Assessment of Resonance and Velopharyngeal Function

Ann W. Kummer1
  • 1Senior Director, Division of Speech Pathology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Professor of Clinical Pediatrics and Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2011 (online)

ABSTRACT

Cleft lip is an anomaly that primarily affects aesthetics, whereas cleft palate is an anomaly that primarily affects function, particularly speech. In fact, the main reason for repairing the palate is to provide adequate structure and function for normal speech production. Despite undergoing palatoplasty surgery, 20 to 30% of children with repaired cleft palate will demonstrate some degree of velopharyngeal dysfunction, resulting in abnormal speech. Velopharyngeal dysfunction is also seen in individuals without a history of cleft palate for various reasons. Because the symptoms of velopharyngeal dysfunction have a variety of causes, a comprehensive evaluation is very important to make the appropriate recommendations for treatment. The purpose of this article is to discuss the clinical assessment of velopharyngeal function for speech, using low-tech and “no-tech” procedures.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hirschberg J, Van Demark D R. A proposal for standardization of speech and hearing evaluations to assess velopharyngeal function.  Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997;  49 (3-4) 158-167
  • 2 Scherer N J, D'Antonio L L. Parent questionnaire for screening early language development in children with cleft palate.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995;  32 (1) 7-13
  • 3 Smith B E, Kuehn D P. Speech evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction.  J Craniofac Surg. 2007;  18 (2) 251-261
  • 4 Kummer A. Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: Effects on Speech and Resonance. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Delmar Learning; 2008
  • 5 Templin M C, Darley F L. Templin-Darley Tests of Articulation. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa; 1969
  • 6 Bzoch K. Bzoch Error Patterns Diagnostic Articulation Test. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa; 1979
  • 7 Peterson-Falzone S J, Hardin-Jones M A, Karnell M P. Cleft Palate Speech. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2010
  • 8 Kummer A. Assessment of Velopharyngeal Function. In: Losee J, Kirschner R, eds. Comprehensive Cleft Care. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2009: 589-605
  • 9 Kummer A. Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: The Effects on Speech and Resonance. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2001
  • 10 Grunwell P, Brondsted K, Henningsson G et al. A six-centre international study of the outcome of treatment in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: the results of a cross-linguistic investigation of cleft palate speech.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000;  34 (3) 219-229
  • 11 Henningsson G, Kuehn D P, Sell D, Sweeney T, Trost-Cardamone J E, Whitehill T L. Speech Parameters Group . Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;  45 (1) 1-17
  • 12 Sell D, John A, Harding-Bell A, Sweeney T, Hegarty F, Freeman J. Cleft audit protocol for speech (CAPS-A): a comprehensive training package for speech analysis.  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;  44 (4) 529-548
  • 13 Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell P. GOS.SP.ASS.'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised).  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999;  34 (1) 17-33
  • 14 Breuls M, Sell D, Manders E, Boulet E, Vander Poorten V. SISL (ScreeningsInstrument Schisis Leuven): assessment of cleft palate speech, resonance and myofunction.  B-ENT. 2006;  2 (Suppl 4) 71-84
  • 15 Lohmander A, Olsson M. Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;  41 (1) 64-70
  • 16 Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell P. A screening assessment of cleft palate speech (Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment).  Eur J Disord Commun. 1994;  29 (1) 1-15
  • 17 Lohmander-Agerskov A, Havstam C, Söderpalm E et al. Assessment of speech in children after repair of isolated cleft palate.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993;  27 (4) 307-310
  • 18 Schneider E, Shprintzen R J. A survey of speech pathologists: current trends in the diagnosis and management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.  Cleft Palate J. 1980;  17 (3) 249-253
  • 19 Sell D. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review.  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005;  40 (2) 103-121
  • 20 Peterson-Falzone S J, Hardin-Jones M A, Karnell M P, McWilliams B J. Cleft Palate Speech. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2001
  • 21 Zraick R I, Liss J M, Dorman M F, Case J L, LaPointe L L, Beals S P. Multidimensional scaling of nasal voice quality.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;  43 (4) 989-996
  • 22 Zraick R I, Liss J M. A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;  43 (4) 979-988
  • 23 Whitehill T L. Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;  39 (1) 50-58t
  • 24 Kummer A W, Curtis C, Wiggs M, Lee L, Strife J L. Comparison of velopharyngeal gap size in patients with hypernasality, hypernasality and nasal emission, or nasal turbulence (rustle) as the primary speech characteristic.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;  29 (2) 152-156
  • 25 Kummer A W, Briggs M, Lee L. The relationship between the characteristics of speech and velopharyngeal gap size.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;  40 (6) 590-596
  • 26 Wang N M, Yeung K W, Chen T A, Chen Y R. Voice disorders in children with velopharyngeal valving problems.  Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1990;  13 (1) 48-53
  • 27 Lewis J R, Andreassen M L, Leeper H A, Macrae D L, Thomas J. Vocal characteristics of children with cleft lip/palate and associated velopharyngeal incompetence.  J Otolaryngol. 1993;  22 (2) 113-117
  • 28 D'Antonio L L, Muntz H R, Province M A, Marsh J L. Laryngeal/voice findings in patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction.  Laryngoscope. 1988;  98 (4) 432-438t
  • 29 Kummer A, Marsh J. Pediatric voice and resonance disorders. In: Johnson A, Jacobson B, eds. Medical Speech-Language Pathology: A Practitioner's Guide. New York, NY: Thieme; 1998
  • 30 Paal S, Reulbach U, Strobel-Schwarthoff K, Nkenke E, Schuster M. Evaluation of speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate.  J Orofac Orthop. 2005;  66 (4) 270-278
  • 31 Bzoch K. Clinical assessment, evaluation and management of 11 categorical aspects of cleft palate speech. In: Bzoch K, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1997: 261-311
  • 32 Haapanen M L. A simple clinical method of evaluating perceived hypernasality.  Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1991;  43 (3) 122-132
  • 33 Johns D F, Rohrich R J, Awada M. Velopharyngeal incompetence: a guide for clinical evaluation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112 (7) 1890-1897
  • 34 Rudnick E F, Sie K C. Velopharyngeal insufficiency: current concepts in diagnosis and management.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;  16 (6) 530-535
  • 35 Sweeney T, Sell D. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;  43 (3) 265-282

Ann W KummerPh.D. CCC-SLP ASHA-F 

Division of Speech Pathology, MLC 4011, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039

Email: ann.kummer@cchmc.org

    >