Benefits of Combined Acoustic and Electric Hearing for Music and Pitch Perception

ABSTRACT

The total number of cochlear implant (CI) recipients worldwide is now approaching 200,000. Most current CI users attain an adequate ability to understand speech using the implant alone, despite having had at least severe to profound hearing impairment in both ears preoperatively. The satisfactory technical performance of modern CI systems, at least in favorable listening conditions, has resulted in an increasing proportion of CI recipients having usable acoustic hearing postoperatively in one ear, or even in both ears. Many studies have confirmed that, in general, the simultaneous use of acoustic and electric hearing can provide perceptual benefits in comparison to the use of a CI alone. An especially important advantage conferred by the use of acoustic hearing is the potentially improved ability of CI recipients to perceive musical sounds. In particular, the perception of pitch, which is usually not provided adequately by today's CI systems, can be enhanced when sounds are heard acoustically by CI users with sufficient hearing sensitivity.

KEYWORDS

Cochlear implants - pitch - music perception - bimodal hearing

REFERENCES

• 1 McDermott H J. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.  Trends Amplif. 2004;  8 (2) 49-82
• 2 Vandali A E, Sucher C M, Tsang D J, McKay C M, Chew J W, McDermott H J. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: a comparison of sound-processing strategies.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;  117 (5) 3126-3138
• 3 Sucher C M, McDermott H J. Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality.  Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;  10 (Suppl 1) 96-99
• 4 Dorman M F, Gifford R H, Spahr A J, McKarns S A. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.  Audiol Neurootol. 2008;  13 (2) 105-112
• 5 Kong Y Y, Stickney G S, Zeng F G. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;  117 (3 Pt 1) 1351-1361
• 6 El Fata F, James C J, Laborde M-L, Fraysse B. How much residual hearing is ‘useful’ for music perception with cochlear implants?.  Audiol Neurootol. 2009;  14 (Suppl 1) 14-21
• 7 Gfeller K E, Turner C W, Mehr M A et al. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.  Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;  3 (1) 29-53
• 8 Moore B CJ, Carlyon R P. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack C J, Fay R R, Oxenham A J, Popper A N, eds. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception. Vol. 24. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2005: 234-277
• 9 McDermott H J, McKay C M. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;  101 (3) 1622-1631
• 10 McDermott H J. Cochlear implants and music. In: Chasin M, ed. Hearing Loss in Musicians, Prevention and Management. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2009: 117-127
• 11 Gfeller K E, Turner C W, Oleson J et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.  Ear Hear. 2007;  28 (3) 412-423
• 12 Blamey P J, Dooley G J, James C J, Parisi E S. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing.  Ear Hear. 2000;  21 (1) 6-17
• 13 Ching T Y. The evidence calls for making binaural-bimodal fittings routine.  The Hearing Journal. 2005;  58 (11) 32-41
• 14 Ching T Y, van Wanrooy E, Dillon H. Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.  Trends Amplif. 2007;  11 (3) 161-192
• 15 Simpson A, Hersbach A A, McDermott H J. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device.  Int J Audiol. 2005;  44 (5) 281-292
• 16 Glista D, Scollie S, Bagatto M, Seewald R, Parsa V, Johnson A. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.  Int J Audiol. 2009;  48 (9) 632-644
• 17 Kuk F, Keenan D, Korhonen P, Lau C C. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;  20 (8) 465-479
• 18 McDermott H, Varsavsky A. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.  J Neural Eng. 2009;  6 (6) 065007
• 19 Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós M I, Pelizzone M. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006;  7 (2) 110-124
• 20 Dorman M F, Spahr T, Gifford R et al. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;  8 (2) 234-240
• 21 Vermeire K, Nobbe A, Schleich P, Nopp P, Voormolen M H, Van de Heyning P H. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.  Hear Res. 2008;  245 (1-2) 98-106
• 22 McDermott H, Sucher C, Simpson A. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.  Audiol Neurootol. 2009;  14 (Suppl 1) 2-7
• 23 Blamey P J, Dooley G J, Parisi E S, Clark G M. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations.  Hear Res. 1996;  99 (1-2) 139-150
• 24 Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham B H, Leake P A. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;  8 (2) 220-233
• 25 Reiss L A, Turner C W, Erenberg S R, Gantz B J. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;  8 (2) 241-257
• 26 Helms J, Weichbold V, Baumann U et al. Analysis of ceiling effects occurring with speech recognition tests in adult cochlear-implanted patients.  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2004;  66 (3) 130-135
• 27 Kuo Y-C, Rosen S, Faulkner A. Acoustic cues to tonal contrasts in Mandarin: implications for cochlear implants.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;  123 (5) 2815-2824
• 28 Xu L, Tsai Y, Pfingst B E. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;  112 (1) 247-258
• 29 Law Z WY, So L KH. Phonological abilities of hearing-impaired Cantonese-speaking children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;  49 (6) 1342-1353
• 30 Fitzpatrick E M, Séguin C, Schramm D, Chenier J, Armstrong S. Users' experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid.  Int J Audiol. 2009;  48 (4) 172-182