Diagnostische Wertigkeit der Cholin-PET / CT bei Patienten mit Prostatakarzinom

Zusammenfassung

Die Cholin-Positronen-Emissionstomografie / Computertomografie (Cholin-PET / CT) wird zunehmend zur Bildgebung des Prostatakarzinoms (PCA) angewandt. In der vorliegenden Übersichtsarbeit werden die Relevanz der Cholin-PET / CT in Primärdiagnostik, Staging und Rezi­divdiagnostik des PCA näher beleuchtet und sinn­volle Einsatzmöglichkeiten in der klinischen ­Praxis aufgezeigt. Hierzu erfolgte eine systema­tische Literaturrecherche über die elektronischen Datenbanken Pubmed und Medline nach Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsarbeiten und Leitartikeln zum Thema Cholin-PET / CT und Prostatakarzinom. In der Primärdiagnostik des PCA kann die Durchführung ­einer Cholin-PET / CT-Untersuchung aufgrund fehlender valider Daten nicht grundsätzlich empfohlen werden. In der Ausbreitungsdiagnostik nimmt die Cholin-PET / CT zur Beurteilung des lokalen Tumorwachstums (T-Staging) aufgrund ihrer geringen räumlichen Auflösung einen untergeordneten Stellenwert ein. Bei der Beurteilung des Lymphknotenstatus (N-Staging) weist sie einen hohen positiv prädiktiven Wert auf und in der Detek­tion von Knochenmetasta­sen (M-Staging) zeigt sie gegenüber der konventionellen Ganz­kör­per­ske­lett­szintigrafie vergleichbare Ergebnisse. In der Rezidivdiagnostik scheint die Cholin-PET / CT für Patienten, die nach bestimmten Kriterien (PSA-Wert > 1,0 ng / ml und/ oder PSA-doubling-time < 6 Monate und / oder Gleason-Score > 7 und / oder Radiatio als Primärtherapie) selektioniert wurden, eine geeignete Untersuchung zur Unterscheidung eines Lokalrezidives von einem systemischen Rezidiv zu sein. Die routinemäßige, unkritische Anwendung der Cholin-PET / CT bei Patienten mit PCA erscheint nicht zuletzt aufgrund der hohen Kosten der Untersuchung als wenig sinnvoll. Sie sollte nach sorgfältiger Auswahl von geeigneten ­Patienten auf bestimmte klinische ­Fragestellungen angewandt werden. 

Abstract

The choline-positron emissiontomography / computed tomography (choline-PET / CT) is a widely used imaging method for prostate cancer. This ­review concentrates on the relevance of choline-PET / CT for primary diagnosis, staging and re­staging of prostate cancer and highlights possible ­applications in clinical practice. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature research via Pubmed and Medline database for original articles, reviews and editorials on choline-PET / CT and prostate cancer. Choline-PET / CT should not be routinely used for primary diagnosis of pros­tate cancer due to a lack of data. With regard to the definition of the local tumour extent (T-stag­ing) choline-PET / CT plays only a minor role, in contrast, for the evaluation of lymph node in­volvement it has a high positive predictive value and is equal to conventional scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases. Moreover, in cases of biochemical relapse following local therapy, choline-PET / CT seems to be appropriate for differentiating between local recurrence and systemic prostate cancer metastasis, particularly when patients are selected by defined criteria (PSA value > 1.0 ng / mL and / or PSAdt < 6 months and / or Gleason score > 7 and / or primary radiotherapy). The non-critical routine use of choline-PET / CT for patients with prostate cancer cannot be recommended, and this not only because of its high costs. It should be applied to definite clinical questions after thorough selection of appropriate patients. 

Schlüsselwörter

Cholin-PET / CT - Prostatakarzinom - Primärdiagnostik - Staging - biochemisches Prostatakarzinomrezidiv

Key words

choline-PET / CT - prostate cancer - primary diagnosis - staging - biochemical recurrence

Literatur

• 1 de Jong I J, Pruim J, Elsinga P H et al. Preoperative staging of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer by ¹¹C-choline PET.  J Nucl Med. 2003;  44 331-335
• 2 Beheshti M, Imamovic L, Broinger G et al. ¹⁸F-choline PET / CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients.  Radiology. 2010;  254 925-933
• 3 Reske S N, Blumstein N M, Neumaier B et al. Imaging prostate cancer with ¹¹C-choline PET / CT.  J Nucl Med. 2006;  47 1249-1254
• 4 Husarik D B, Miralbell R, Dubs M et al. Evaluation of [(¹⁸)F]-choline PET / CT for staging and restaging of prostate cancer.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;  35 253-263
• 5 Hara T, Bansal A, DeGrado T R. Choline transporter as a novel target for molecular imaging of cancer.  Mol Imaging. 2006;  5 498-509
• 6 DeGrado T R, Coleman R E, Wang S et al. Synthesis and evaluation of ¹⁸F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.  Cancer Res. 2001;  61 110-117
• 7 Delongchamps N B, de la Roza G, Jones R et al. Saturation biopsies on ­autopsied prostates for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer.  BJU Int. 2009;  103 49-54
• 8 Simon J, Kuefer R, Bartsch Jr G et al. Intensifying the saturation biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies: a step in the wrong direction.  BJU Int. 2008;  102 459-462
• 9 Yoshida S, Nakagomi K, Goto S et al. ¹¹C-choline positron emission ­tomography in prostate cancer: primary staging and recurrent site staging.  Urol Int. 2005;  74 214-220
• 10 Farsad M, Schiavina R, Castellucci P et al. Detection and localization of prostate cancer: correlation of (¹¹)C-choline PET / CT with histopatho­logic step-section analysis.  J Nucl Med. 2005;  46 1642-1649
• 11 Amsellem-Ouazana D, Younes P, Conquy S et al. Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study.  Eur Urol. 2005;  47 582-586
• 12 Cirillo S, Petracchini M, Della Monica P et al. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.  Clin Radiol. 2008;  63 871-879
• 13 Yuen J S, Thng C H, Tan P H et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy.  J Urol. 2004;  171 1482-1486
• 14 Yamaguchi T, Lee J, Uemura H et al. Prostate cancer: a comparative study of ¹¹C-choline PET and MR imaging combined with proton MR spectroscopy.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;  32 742-748
• 15 Testa C, Schiavina R, Lodi R et al. Prostate cancer: sextant localization with MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and ¹¹C-choline PET / CT.  Radiol­ogy. 2007;  244 797-806
• 16 May F, Treumann T, Dettmar P et al. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer.  BJU Int. 2001;  87 66-69
• 17 Rinnab L, Blumstein N M, Mottaghy F M et al. ¹¹C-choline positron-emission tomography / computed tomography and transrectal ultrasonography for staging localized prostate cancer.  BJU Int. 2007;  99 1421-1426
• 18 Janane A, Hajji F, Ismail T O et al. Endorectal MRI accuracy in auguring tumour location, tumour extent, capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion of prostate cancer in north-African men.  Eur J Radiol. 2011;  25
• 19 Nakashima J, Tanimoto A, Imai Y et al. Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer.  Urology. 2004;  64 101-105
• 20 Futterer J J, Engelbrecht M R, Jager G J et al. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 1055-1065
• 21 Brajtbord J S, Lavery H J, Nabizada-Pace F et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer.  BJU Int. 2010;  26
• 22 Martorana G, Schiavina R, Corti B et al. ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for tumor localization of primary prostate cancer in comparison with 12-core biopsy.  J Urol. 2006;  176 954-960
• 23 Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Von Knobloch R. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.  J Urol. 2002;  167 1681-1686
• 24 Makarov D V, Trock B J, Humphreys E B et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.  Urology. 2007;  69 1095-1101
• 25 Hacker A, Jeschke S, Leeb K et al. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine positron emission tomography-computerized tomography and laparoscopic radioisotope guided sentinel lymph node dissection.  J Urol. 2006;  176 2014-2018
• 26 Budiharto T, Joniau S, Lerut E et al. Prospective Evaluation of (¹¹)C-Choline Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Nodal Staging of Prostate Cancer with a High Risk of Lymph Node Metastases.  Eur Urol. 2011;  18
• 27 Schiavina R, Scattoni V, Castellucci P et al. ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph-node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms.  Eur Urol. 2008;  54 392-401
• 28 Abuzallouf S, Dayes I, Lukka H. Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature.  J Urol. 2004;  171 2122-2127
• 29 Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E et al. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: ^99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, ¹⁸F-fluoride PET, and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET / CT.  J Nucl Med. 2006;  47 287-297
• 30 Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P et al. The use of F-18 choline PET in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer: correlation with morphological changes on CT.  Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;  11 446-454
• 31 Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P et al. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by ¹⁸F fluorocholine and ¹⁸F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;  35 1766-1774
• 32 Han M, Partin A W, Zahurak M et al. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.  J Urol. 2003;  169 517-523
• 33 Freedland S J, Presti Jr J C, Amling C L et al. Time trends in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results of the SEARCH database.  Urology. 2003;  61 736-741
• 34 Beresford M J, Gillatt D, Benson R J et al. A Systematic Review of the Role of Imaging before Salvage Radiotherapy for Post-prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence.  Clinical Oncology. 2010;  22 46-55
• 35 Kane C J, Amling C L, Johnstone P A et al. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.  Urology. 2003;  61 607-611
• 36 Schoder H, Herrmann K, Gonen M et al. 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the detection of disease in patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy.  Clin Cancer Res. 2005;  11 4761-4769
• 37 Albrecht S, Buchegger F, Soloviev D et al. (¹¹)C-acetate PET in the early evaluation of prostate cancer recurrence.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;  34 185-196
• 38 Schuster D M, Votaw J R, Nieh P T et al. Initial experience with the radiotracer anti-1-amino-3–¹⁸F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid with PET / CT in prostate carcinoma.  J Nucl Med. 2007;  48 56-63
• 39 de Jong I J, Pruim J, Elsinga P H et al. ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer.  Eur Urol. 2003;  44 32-38
• 40 Rinnab L, Mottaghy F M, Blumstein N M et al. Evaluation of [¹¹C]-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer.  BJU Int. 2007;  100 786-793
• 41 Rinnab L, Simon J, Hautmann R E. et al . [(11)C]choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.  World J Urol. 2009;  27 619-625
• 42 Castellucci P, Fuccio C, Nanni C et al. Influence of trigger PSA and PSA kinetics on ¹¹C-Choline PET / CT detection rate in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy.  J Nucl Med. 2009;  50 1394-1400
• 43 Cimitan M, Bortolus R, Morassut S et al. [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET / CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;  33 1387-1398
• 44 Bott S R. Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;  7 211-216
• 45 Giovacchini G, Picchio M, Coradeschi E et al. Predictive factors of [(¹¹)C]choline PET / CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;  37 301-309
• 46 Reske S N, Blumstein N M, Glatting G. [¹¹C]choline PET / CT imaging in ­occult local relapse of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;  35 9-17
• 47 Stephenson A J, Scardino P T, Kattan M W et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.  J Clin Oncol. 2007;  25 2035-2041
• 48 Giovacchini G, Picchio M, Scattoni V et al. PSA doubling time for prediction of [(¹¹)C]choline PET / CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 1106;  37 1106-1116
• 49 Breeuwsma A J, Pruim J, van den Bergh A C et al. Detection of local, regional, and distant recurrence in patients with psa relapse after external-beam radiotherapy using (¹¹)C-choline positron emission tomography.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;  77 160-164
• 50 Nguyen P L, D‘Amico A V, Lee A K et al. Patient selection, cancer control, and complications after salvage local therapy for postradiation prostate-specific antigen failure: a systematic review of the literature.  Cancer. 2007;  110 1417-1428