Recovery and Rehabilitation after Stroke

ABSTRACT

Most individuals survive stroke and age with its consequences. Rehabilitation becomes the dominant medical need soon after onset, and coordinated rehabilitation services using evidence-based interventions determined by patient need are of primary importance in affecting outcome and quality of life. This discussion will focus on the natural history of recovery after stroke and the changes in brain organization that support behavioral improvement during recovery, then review established and emerging therapeutic approaches directed at improving independent functional performance and quality of life.

KEYWORDS

Impairment - activities - participation - plasticity

REFERENCES

• 1 Carandang R, Seshadri S, Beiser A et al.. Trends in incidence, lifetime risk, severity, and 30-day mortality of stroke over the past 50 years.  JAMA. 2006;  296 (24) 2939-2946
• 2 Hallström B, Jönsson A C, Nerbrand C, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Stroke incidence and survival in the beginning of the 21st century in southern Sweden: comparisons with the late 20th century and projections into the future.  Stroke. 2008;  39 (1) 10-15
• 3 WHO .International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Available at: http://www3.who.int/icf/ Accessed
• 4 Ward N S, Brown M M, Thompson A J, Frackowiak R SJ. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study.  Brain. 2003;  126 (Pt 6) 1430-1448
• 5 Cramer S C, Parrish T B, Levy R M et al.. Predicting functional gains in a stroke trial.  Stroke. 2007;  38 (7) 2108-2114
• 6 Stinear C M, Barber P A, Smale P R, Coxon J P, Fleming M K, Byblow W D. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity.  Brain. 2007;  130 (Pt 1) 170-180
• 7 Cramer S C. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery.  Ann Neurol. 2008;  63 (3) 272-287
• 8 Zhu L LBS, Lindenberg R MD, Alexander M PMD, Schlaug G MDP. Lesion load of the corticospinal tract predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke.  Stroke. 2010;  41 (5) 910-915
• 9 Jørgensen H S, Nakayama H, Raaschou H O, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen T S. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;  76 (5) 399-405
• 10 Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase C S, Scaramucci A, D'Agostino R B, Wolf P A. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study.  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;  12 (3) 119-126
• 11 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults—United States, 1999.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;  50 (7) 120-125
• 12 Gargano J W, Reeves M J. Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry Michigan Prototype Investigators . Sex differences in stroke recovery and stroke-specific quality of life: results from a statewide stroke registry.  Stroke. 2007;  38 (9) 2541-2548
• 13 Jørgensen H S, Nakayama H, Raaschou H O, Olsen T S. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;  76 (1) 27-32
• 14 Wolf S L, Lecraw D E, Barton L A, Jann B B. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients.  Exp Neurol. 1989;  104 (2) 125-132
• 15 Taub E, Uswatte G. Use of CI therapy for improving motor ability after chronic CNS damage: a development prefigured by Paul Bach-y-Rita.  J Integr Neurosci. 2005;  4 (4) 465-477
• 16 Dhamoon M S, Moon Y P, Paik M C et al.. Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study.  Stroke. 2009;  40 (8) 2805-2811
• 17 Xie J, Wu E Q, Zheng Z J et al.. Impact of stroke on health-related quality of life in the noninstitutionalized population in the United States.  Stroke. 2006;  37 (10) 2567-2572
• 18 Lai S M, Studenski S, Duncan P W, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale.  Stroke. 2002;  33 (7) 1840-1844
• 19 Patel M D, McKevitt C, Lawrence E, Rudd A G, Wolfe C D. Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke.  Age Ageing. 2007;  36 (3) 316-322
• 20 Cramer S C, Chopp M. Recovery recapitulates ontogeny.  Trends Neurosci. 2000;  23 (6) 265-271
• 21 Chopp M, Li Y, Zhang J. Plasticity and remodeling of brain.  J Neurol Sci. 2008;  265 (1-2) 97-101
• 22 Cramer S C, Riley J D. Neuroplasticity and brain repair after stroke.  Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;  21 (1) 76-82
• 23 Nudo R J. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery.  Stroke. 2007;  38 (2, Suppl) 840-845
• 24 Nudo R J, Wise B M, SiFuentes F, Milliken G W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.  Science. 1996;  272 (5269) 1791-1794
• 25 Ward N S. The neural substrates of motor recovery after focal damage to the central nervous system.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;  87 (12, Suppl 2) S30-S35
• 26 Jones T A, Kleim J A, Greenough W T. Synaptogenesis and dendritic growth in the cortex opposite unilateral sensorimotor cortex damage in adult rats: a quantitative electron microscopic examination.  Brain Res. 1996;  733 (1) 142-148
• 27 Kleim J A, Barbay S, Cooper N R et al.. Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex.  Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;  77 (1) 63-77
• 28 Monfils M H, VandenBerg P M, Kleim J A, Teskey G C. Long-term potentiation induces expanded movement representations and dendritic hypertrophy in layer V of rat sensorimotor neocortex.  Cereb Cortex. 2004;  14 (5) 586-593
• 29 Kleim J A, Bruneau R, Calder K et al.. Functional organization of adult motor cortex is dependent upon continued protein synthesis.  Neuron. 2003;  40 (1) 167-176
• 30 Stroemer R P, Kent T A, Hulsebosch C E. Neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery after neocortical infarction in rats.  Stroke. 1995;  26 (11) 2135-2144
• 31 Li Y, Chopp M, Powers C, Jiang N. Apoptosis and protein expression after focal cerebral ischemia in rat.  Brain Res. 1997;  765 (2) 301-312
• 32 Li Y, Jiang N, Powers C, Chopp M, Johansson B B. Neuronal damage and plasticity identified by microtubule-associated protein 2, growth-associated protein 43, and cyclin D1 immunoreactivity after focal cerebral ischemia in rats.  Stroke. 1998;  29 (9) 1972-1980 discussion 1980-1981
• 33 Chopp M, Zhang Z G, Jiang Q. Neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and MRI indices of functional recovery from stroke.  Stroke. 2007;  38 (2, Suppl) 827-831
• 34 Jones T A, Allred R P, Adkins D L, Hsu J E, O'Bryant A, Maldonado M A. Remodeling the brain with behavioral experience after stroke.  Stroke. 2009;  40 (3, Suppl) S136-S138
• 35 Ginsberg M D. Current status of neuroprotection for cerebral ischemia: synoptic overview.  Stroke. 2009;  40 (3, Suppl) S111-S114
• 36 Burns T C, Verfaillie C M, Low W C. Stem cells for ischemic brain injury: a critical review.  J Comp Neurol. 2009;  515 (1) 125-144
• 37 Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L et al.. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke.  Stroke. 2003;  34 (9) 2173-2180
• 38 Brown A W, Bjelke B, Fuxe K. Motor response to amphetamine treatment, task-specific training, and limited motor experience in a postacute animal stroke model.  Exp Neurol. 2004;  190 (1) 102-108
• 39 Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches.  Phys Ther. 1986;  66 (8) 1233-1238
• 40 Perry C E. Principles and techniques of the Brunnstrom approach to the treatment of hemiplegia.  Am J Phys Med. 1967;  46 (1) 789-815
• 41 Kollen B J, Lennon S, Lyons B et al.. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence?.  Stroke. 2009;  40 (4) e89-e97
• 42 Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince L, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1980: 371-401
• 43 O'Dell M W, Lin C C, Harrison V. Stroke rehabilitation: strategies to enhance motor recovery.  Annu Rev Med. 2009;  60 55-68
• 44 Wolf S L. Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse “learned”? and other quandaries.  Phys Ther. 2007;  87 (9) 1212-1223
• 45 Wolf S L, Winstein C J, Miller J P EXCITE Investigators et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.  JAMA. 2006;  296 (17) 2095-2104
• 46 Lo A C, Guarino P D, Richards L G et al.. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2010;  362 (19) 1772-1783
• 47 Lum P S, Burgar C G, Van der Loos M, Shor P C, Majmundar M, Yap R. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;  43 (5) 631-642
• 48 Husemann B, Müller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.  Stroke. 2007;  38 (2) 349-354
• 49 Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Fröhlich K, Saltuari L. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;  21 (4) 307-314
• 50 Hesse S, Werner C, von Frankenberg S, Bardeleben A. Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke.  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;  14 (1, Suppl) 111-123
• 51 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A, Malezic M, Mauritz K H. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;  75 (10) 1087-1093
• 52 Moseley A M, Stark A, Cameron I D, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;  (4) CD002840
• 53 Chae J, Sheffler L, Knutson J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;  15 (5) 412-426
• 54 Robbins S M, Houghton P E, Woodbury M G, Brown J L. The therapeutic effect of functional and transcutaneous electric stimulation on improving gait speed in stroke patients: a meta-analysis.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;  87 (6) 853-859
• 55 Yan T, Hui-Chan C WY, Li L SW. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.  Stroke. 2005;  36 (1) 80-85
• 56 Bhadra N, Chae J. Implantable neuroprosthetic technology.  NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;  25 (1) 69-83
• 57 Adamovich S V, Fluet G G, Tunik E, Merians A S. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review.  NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;  25 (1) 29-44
• 58 Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;  14 (2) 52-61
• 59 Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS.  Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;  3 (7) 383-393
• 60 Leker R R, Lasri V, Chernoguz D. Growth factors improve neurogenesis and outcome after focal cerebral ischemia.  J Neural Transm. 2009;  116 (11) 1397-1402
• 61 Lanfranconi S, Locatelli F, B Corti S et al.. Growth factors in ischemic stroke.  J Cell Mol Med. 2009;  (December) 8 [Epub ahead of print]
• 62 Buch E, Weber C, Cohen L G et al.. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke.  Stroke. 2008;  39 (3) 910-917
• 63 Kleim J A, Chan S, Pringle E et al.. BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex.  Nat Neurosci. 2006;  9 (6) 735-737
• 64 Pearson-Fuhrhop K M, Kleim J A, Cramer S C. Brain plasticity and genetic factors.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;  16 (4) 282-299
• 65 Duncan P W, Zorowitz R, Bates B et al.. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline.  Stroke. 2005;  36 (9) e100-e143
• 66 Anonymous . Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.  [Systematic Review] Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;  (4) CD000197
• 67 Horn S D, Gassaway J. Practice-based evidence study design for comparative effectiveness research.  Med Care. 2007;  45 (10, Supl 2) S50-S57
• 68 Stuart M, Benvenuti F, Macko R et al.. Community-based adaptive physical activity program for chronic stroke: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Empoli model.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;  23 (7) 726-734