RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000121.xml
Orthopedic Trauma Directions 2010; 8(6): 17-24
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267059
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267059
Clinical topic
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Proximal femoral fractures
Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplastyWeitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
11. Januar 2011 (online)
Summary
Evidence from five randomized controlled trials suggests that treatment of proximal femoral fractures with unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) leads to comparable results with respect to functional outcomes, short and long-term mortality, and risk of dislocation and infection. Only one study had a follow-up rate of 85% or greater. Low rates of follow-up lead to possible selection bias. Additional methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials with higher follow-up rates are necessary to establish the long-term safety and to compare the efficacy of these two operative treatments.