Evidence of Clinically Significant Change: The Therapeutic Alliance and the Possibilities of Outcomes-Informed Care

ABSTRACT

This article addresses the issue of clinically significant (or meaningful) change resulting from treatment for stuttering. Research in both medical and behavioral fields indicates that clients often have their own unique perspective of meaningful clinical change and that this perspective is often different from that of the professional administering the treatment. Among the variables that the client brings to the treatment session are their progression through stages of therapeutic change and the ways in which they believe they are capable of coping with their problem. Research has shown that how an individual interprets the meaning his or her therapeutic experience is central to clinically significant change. Procedures for obtaining feedback from clients concerning clinically significant change and the quality of the therapeutic alliance are described.

KEYWORDS

Clinical change - common factors - therapeutic alliance

REFERENCES

• 1 Kazdin A E. Assessment and Evaluation of interventions. In: Kazdin AE Research Design in Clinical Psychology. Needham Heights, MA; Allyn & Bacon 2003: 408-435
• 2 Houle T T, Stump D A. Statistical significance versus clinical significance.  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;  12(1) 5-6
• 3 Craig A, Andrews G. The prediction and prevention of relapse in stuttering. The value of self-control techniques and locus of control measures.  Behav Modif. 1985;  9(4) 427-442
• 4 Fisher D, Stewart A, Lorig K, Holman H. Patient perceptions of clinical change and its meaning correlate poorly with change measured by conventional instruments. AHSR FHSR Annual Meeting Abstract Book 1995 12: 56-57
• 5 Finn P. Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: II. Clinical significance of behavioral stuttering treatments.  J Fluency Disord. 2003;  28(3) 209-217 quiz 217-218
• 6 Ingham R J, Cordes A K. Self-measurement and evaluating treatment efficacy. In: Curlee RF, Siegel GM Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions. San Diego, CA; Singular 1997: 413-437
• 7 Ingham R J. Performance-contingent management in adolescents and adults. In: Curlee RF Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency. New York, NY; Thieme 1999: 200-221
• 8 Ingham R J, Kilgo M, Ingham J C, Moglia R A, Belknap H, Sanchez T. Evaluation of a stuttering treatment based on reduction of short phonation intervals.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;  44(6) 1229-1244
• 9 Kazdin A E. The meanings and measurement of clinical significance.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;  67(3) 332-339
• 10 Baer D M. If you know why you're changing a behavior, you'll know when you've changed it enough.  Behav Assess. 1988;  10 219-223
• 11 Plexico L W, Manning W H, Levitt H. Coping responses by adults who stutter: part I. Protecting the self and others.  J Fluency Disord. 2009;  34(2) 87-107
• 12 Prochaska J O, DiClemente C C. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. In Herson M, Eisler R, Miller P Progress in Behavior Modification. Sycamore, IL; Sycamore 1992: 184-218
• 13 Floyd J, Zebrowski P M, Flamme G A. Stages of change and stuttering: a preliminary view.  J Fluency Disord. 2007;  32(2) 95-120
• 14 Lazarus R S, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY; Springer 1984
• 15 Folkman S, Lazarus R S. Coping and emotion. In: Stein NL, Leventhal B, Trabasso T Psychological and Biological Approaches to Emotion. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 1990: 313-332
• 16 Plexico L, Manning W H, Levitt H. Coping responses by adults who stutter: part II. Approaching the problem and achieving agency.  J Fluency Disord. 2009;  34(2) 108-126
• 17 Bernstein Ratner N. Evidence-based practice in stuttering: some questions to consider.  J Fluency Disord. 2005;  30(3) 163-188
• 18 Westen D, Morrison K. A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: an empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;  69(6) 875-899
• 19 Wampold B E. The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 2001
• 20 Miller S D, Duncan B, Hubble M A. Escape from Babel: Toward a Unifying Language for Psychotherapy Practice. New York, NY; W. W. Norton 1997
• 21 Wampold B E, Mondin G W, Moody M et al.. A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empirically, “all must have prizes”.  Psychol Bull. 1997;  122 203-215
• 22 Hancock K, Craig A. Predictors of stuttering relapse one year following treatment for children aged 9 to 14 years.  J Fluency Disord. 1998;  23 31-48
• 23 Hunick W J, Peters H FM. Effect of speech therapy on stuttering: evaluating three therapy programs. Presented at: The IALPL Congress September 2004 Brisbane, Australia;
• 24 Franken M C, Kielstra-Van der Schalk C J, Boelens H. Experimental treatment of early stuttering: a preliminary study.  J Fluency Disord. 2005;  30(3) 189-199
• 25 Herder C, Howard C, Nye C, Vanryckeghem M. Effectiveness of behavioral stuttering treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disord. 2006;  33 61-73
• 26 Gillam R B, Loeb D F, Hoffman L M et al.. The efficacy of Fast ForWord Language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;  51(1) 97-119
• 27 Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;  47(4) 924-943
• 28 Robey R R. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41(1) 172-187
• 29 Brown G S. Common factors and therapeutic effects in therapy outcomes. Center for Clinical Informatics, Paper presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association November 2004 Philadelphia, PA;
• 30 Rosenzweig S. Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy.  Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1936;  6 412-415
• 31 Smith M L, Glass G V. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.  Am Psychol. 1977;  32(9) 752-760
• 32 Kim D M, Wampold B E, Bolt D M. Therapist effects and treatment effects in psychotherapy: analysis of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.  Psychother Res. 2006;  16(2) 161-172
• 33 Whipple J L, Lambert M J, Vermeersch D A, Amart D W, Nielsen S L, Hawkins E J. Improving the effects of psychotherapy: the use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice.  J Couns Psychol. 2003;  50 59-68
• 34 Miller S D, Duncan B. The Outcome and Session Rating Scales; Administration and Scoring Manual. Chicago, IL; Institute for the Study of Therapeutic Change 2000
• 35 Duncan B, Miller S D. The Heroic Client: Doing Client Directed, Outcome Informed Therapy. San Francisco, CA; Jossey Bass 2000
• 36 Bordin E S. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance.  Psychotherapy Theory, Research, and Practice. 1979;  16 252-260
• 37 Brisk D J, Healey E C, Hux K A. Clinicians' training and confidence associated with treating school-age children who stutter: a national survey.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997;  28 164-176
• 38 Cooper E B, Cooper C S. Clinician attitudes toward stuttering: a decade of change (1973–1983).  J Fluency Disord. 1985;  10 19-33
• 39 Cooper E B, Cooper C S. Clinician attitudes towards stuttering: two decades of change.  J Fluency Disord. 1996;  21 119-135
• 40 Kelly E M, Martin J S, Baker K I et al.. Academic and clinical preparation and practices of school speech-language pathologists with people who stutter.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997;  28 195-212
• 41 Kroll R, Cook F, De Nil L, Ratner N. Preparing clinicians to treat stuttering. Paper presented at: the Fifth world congress on Fluency Disorders; July 2006 Dublin, Ireland; See also the 2006 International Stuttering Awareness Conference Available at: http://www.mnsu.edu/comdis/isad9/papers/kroll9.html Accessed October 8, 2009
• 42 Mallard A R, Gardner L, Downey C. Clinical training in stuttering for school clinicians.  J Fluency Disord. 1988;  13 253-259
• 43 Matkin N, Ringle R, Snope T. Master report of surveys discrepancies. In Rees N, Snope T Proceedings of the Conference on Undergraduate, Graduate and Continuing Education (ASHA Reports No. 13). Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1983
• 44 Reeves P L. The role of self-help/mutual aid in addressing the needs of individuals who stutter. In: Bernstein Ratner N, Tetnowski J Current Issues in Stuttering Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 2006: 255-278
• 45 St. Louis K O, Durrenberger C H. Clinician preferences for managing various communication disorders. Presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association November 1992 San Antonio, TX;
• 46 Tellis G M, Bressler L, Emerick K. An exploration of clinicians views about assessment and treatment of stuttering.  Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disord. 2008;  18 16-23
• 47 Yaruss J S. Current status of academic and clinical education in fluency disorders at ASHA-accredited training programs.  J Fluency Disord. 1999;  24 169-183
• 48 Yaruss J S, Quesal R W. Academic and clinical education in fluency disorders: an update.  J Fluency Disord. 2002;  27(1) 43-62 quiz 62-63
• 49 Quesal R W. Curricular modifications to meet the 2005 CCC-SLP standards in a rural CSD program. Presented at: The Annual Meeting of the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders April 2002 Palm Springs, CA;

1 The Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale, the Reliable Change Chart, and related research may be downloaded from Scott D. Miller's website (http://www.scottdmiller.com).