Planta Med 2010; 76 - O_7
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1264193

Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) to demonstrate the nuclear binding of flavanols and (–-epigallocatechin gallate

I Mueller-Harvey 1, S Botchway 2, W Feucht 3, J Polster 3, P Burgos 2, A Parker 2
  • 1University of Reading, Agriculture, 1 Earley Gate, P O Box 236, RG6 6AT Reading, United Kingdom
  • 2Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Central Laser Facility, HSIC, OX11 0QX Didcot, United Kingdom
  • 3Technical University of Munich, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan, Freising, 85354 Freising, Germany

The use of light microscopy and DMACA staining strongly suggested that plant and animal cell nuclei act as sinks for flavanols [1, 2]. Detailed uv-vis spectroscopic titration experiments indicated that histone proteins are the likely binding sites in the nucleus [2]. Here we report the development of a multi-photon excitation microscopy technique combined with fluorescent lifetime measurements of flavanols. Using this technique, (+) catechin, (–) epicatechin and (–) epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) showed strikingly different excited state lifetimes in solution. Interaction of histone proteins with flavanols was indicated by the appearance of a significant τ2-component of 1.7 to 4.0ns. Tryptophan interference could be circumvented in the in vivo fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) experiments with 2-photon excitation at 630nm. This enabled visualisation and semi-quantitative measurements that demonstrated unequivocally the absorption of (+)catechin, (–)epicatechin and EGCG by nuclei of onion cells. 3D FLIM revealed for the first time that externally added EGCG penetrated the whole nucleus in onion cells. The relative proportions of EGCG in cytoplasm: nucleus: nucleoli were ca. 1:10:100. FLIM experiments may therefore facilitate probing the health effects of EGCG, which is the major constituent of green tea.

Acknowledgements: The Science and Technology Facilities Council provided facility access time

References: 1. Feucht W. et al. (2004) Plant Cell Rep 22: 430–436.

2. Polster J. et al (2003) Biol. Chem. 384: 997–1006.