Zentralbl Chir 2011; 136(2): 129-134
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262768
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York

Das abdominale Kompartmentsyndrom – Relevanz und therapeutische Konsequenzen

The Abdominal Compartment Syndrome – Relevance and Therapeutic ConsequencesS. Utzolino1 , C. Kayser1 , U. T. Hopt1
  • 1Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Freiburg, Deutschland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 February 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die intraabdominale Hypertension (IAH) hat eine hohe Prävalenz bei Intensivpatienten. Sie wird zunehmend als Risikofaktor für schlechtes Outcome wahrgenommen. Patienten / Material und Methoden: Review der vorliegenden Literatur mit Angabe konkreter Handlungsvorschläge. Definitionen, einheitliche Messmethoden des intraabdominellen Druckes (IAP) und Therapieoptionen von konservativ bis zur Dekompressionslaparotomie werden erörtert. Ergebnisse: Das Abdominale Kompartmentsyndrom (ACS) ist definiert als IAH mit einem an­haltenden Druck über 20 mmHg in Verbindung mit neu aufgetretenem Organversagen. Es tritt insbesondere bei chirurgischen Intensivpatienten auf und ist mit einer schlechten Prognose verknüpft. Die mit IAH assoziierten Funktionsstö­rungen betreffen vor allem Niere und Lunge. Der Pathomechanismus ist im Wesentlichen die ­intra­abdominelle Perfusionsstörung. Der klinische Eindruck allein erlaubt keine valide Abschätzung des intraabdominellen Druckes. Schlussfolgerung: Bei klinischen Risikopatienten sollte der IAP auch prophylaktisch gemessen werden. Bei IAH müssen konservative Maßnahmen zur Senkung ergriffen werden, bei ausbleibendem Erfolg muss die Dekompressionslaparotomie erwogen werden. 

Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) has a high prevalence among critically ill patients. It is increasingly recognised as a risk factor for poor outcome. Patients / Material and Methods: A review of the literature including explicit management instructions was performed. We report the standardised techniques for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement as well as consensus definitions and treatment recommendations ranging from conservative measures to decompression laparotomy. Results: The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as a sustained IAH > 20 mmHg accompanied by new organ dysfunctions. It occurs predominantly in surgical patients and is asso­ciat­ed with a poor outcome. Organ dysfunctions related to IAH mainly concern the kidneys and ­respiratory system. The mechanism of action essentially is a perfusion deficit. Clinical judgement alone does not allow a valid estimate of intra-abdominal pressure. Conclusion: In patients at risk the IAP should be measured. In case of IAH conservative options for lowering the pressure are mandatory. Decompression laparotomy should be considered if conservative measures fail. 

Literatur

  • 1 Emerson H. Intra-abdominal pressures.  Arch Intern Med. 1911;  7 754-784
  • 2 Thorington J M, Schmidt C F. A study of urinary output and blood-pressure changes resulting in experimental ascites.  Am J Med Sci. 1923;  165 880-889
  • 3 Overholt R. Intraabdominal pressure.  Arch Surg. 1931;  22 691-703
  • 4 Ertel W, Oberholzer A, Platz A et al. Incidence and clinical pattern of the abdominal compartment syndrome after “damage-control” laparo­tomy in 311 patients with severe abdominal and / or pelvic trauma.  Crit Care Med. 2000;  28 1747-1753
  • 5 Cullen D J, Coyle J P, Teplick R et al. Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal effects of massively increased intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients.  Crit Care Med. 1989;  17 118-121
  • 6 Richardson J D, Trinkle J K. Hemodynamic and respiratory alterations with increased intra-abdominal pressure.  J Surg Res. 1976;  20 401-404
  • 7 Kron I L, Harman P K, Nolan S P. The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration.  Ann Surg. 1984;  199 28-30
  • 8 Shelly M P, Robinson A A, Hesford J W et al. Haemodynamic effects following surgical release of increased intra-abdominal pressure.  Br J Anaesth. 1987;  59 800-805
  • 9 Grubben A C, van Baardwijk A A, Broering D C et al. Pathophysiologie und Bedeutung des abdominellen Kompartmentsyndroms.  Zentralbl Chir. 2001;  126 605-609
  • 10 Vidal M G, Ruiz Weisser J, Gonzalez F et al. Incidence and clinical effects of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients.  Crit Care Med. 2008;  36 1823-1831
  • 11 Malbrain M L, Chiumello D, Pelosi P et al. Incidence and prognosis of ­intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: a multiple-center epidemiological study.  Crit Care Med. 2005;  33 315-322
  • 12 Schein M, Ivatury R. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 1027-1028
  • 13 Cheatham M L, Malbrain M L, Kirkpatrick A et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations.  Intensive Care Med. 2007;  33 951-962
  • 14 Malbrain M L, Cheatham M L, Kirkpatrick A et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions.  Intensive Care Med. 2006;  32 1722-1732
  • 15 Gudmundsson F F, Viste A, Gislason H et al. Comparison of different methods for measuring intra-abdominal pressure.  Intensive Care Med. 2002;  28 509-514
  • 16 Iberti T J, Kelly K M, Gentili D R et al. A simple technique to accurately ­determine intra-abdominal pressure.  Crit Care Med. 1987;  15 1140-1142
  • 17 De Waele J, Pletinckx P, Blot S et al. Saline volume in transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement: enough is enough.  Intensive Care Med. 2006;  32 455-459
  • 18 Verzilli D, Constantin J M, Sebbane M et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury / acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study.  Crit Care. 2010;  14 R137
  • 19 De Keulenaer B L, De Waele J J, Powell B et al. What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure?.  Intensive Care Med. 2009;  35 969-976
  • 20 Balogh Z, McKinley B A, Holcomb J B et al. Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure.  J Trauma. 2003;  54 848-859 discussion 859–861
  • 21 Malbrain M L, Chiumello D, Pelosi P et al. Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study.  Intensive Care Med. 2004;  30 822-829
  • 22 Malbrain M L, Deeren D, De Potter T J. Intra-abdominal hypertension in the critically ill: it is time to pay attention.  Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;  11 156-171
  • 23 Schneider C G, Scholz J, Izbicki J R. Das abdominelle Kompartment-Syndrom.  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2000;  35 523-529
  • 24 Cheatham M L, White M W, Sagraves S G et al. Abdominal perfusion pressure: a superior parameter in the assessment of intra-abdominal hypertension.  J Trauma. 2000;  49 621-626 discussion 626–627
  • 25 Ranieri V M, Brienza N, Santostasi S et al. Impairment of lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: role of abdominal distension.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;  156 1082-1091
  • 26 Pelosi P, Quintel M, Malbrain M L. Effect of intra-abdominal pressure on respiratory mechanics.  Acta Clin Belg Suppl. 2007;  78-88
  • 27 McNelis J, Soffer S, Marini C P et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome in the surgical intensive care unit.  Am Surg. 2002;  68 18-23
  • 28 Cothren C C, Moore E E, Johnson J L et al. Outcomes in surgical versus medical patients with the secondary abdominal compartment syndrome.  Am J Surg. 2007;  194 804-807 discussion 807–808
  • 29 Reintam A, Parm P, Kitus R et al. Primary and secondary intra-abdominal hypertension – different impact on ICU outcome.  Intensive Care Med. 2008;  34 1624-1631
  • 30 Reintam A, Parm P, Kitus R et al. Gastrointestinal failure score in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.  Crit Care. 2008;  12 R90
  • 31 Utzolino S, Hopt U T, Kaffarnik M. Die postoperative Sepsis: Diagnose, Besonderheiten, Management.  Zentralbl Chir. 2010;  135 240-248
  • 32 O’Mara M S, Slater H, Goldfarb I W et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of intra-abdominal pressures with crystalloid and colloid resuscitation in burn patients.  J Trauma. 2005;  58 1011-1018
  • 33 Cheatham M L, Safcsak K. Is the evolving management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome improving survival?.  Crit Care Med. 2010;  38 402-407
  • 34 De Waele J J, Hoste E A, Malbrain M L. Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome – a critical analysis.  Crit Care. 2006;  10 R51
  • 35 An G, West M A. Abdominal compartment syndrome: a concise clinical review.  Crit Care Med. 2008;  36 1304-1310
  • 36 Pupelis G, Austrums E, Snippe K et al. Clinical significance of increased intraabdominal pressure in severe acute pancreatitis.  Acta Chir Belg. 2002;  102 71-74
  • 37 Tautenhahn J, Pross M, Kuhn R et al. Der Einsatz des V.A.C.(R)-Systems im Wundmanagement bei Grenzindikationen.  Zentralbl Chir. 2004;  129 Suppl 1 S12-S13
  • 38 Weidenhagen R, Grutzner K U, Kopp R et al. Einsatzmöglichkeiten der Vakuumtherapie zur Therapie des septischen Abdomens.  Zentralbl Chir. 2006;  131 Suppl 1 S115-S119
  • 39 Wild T, Stortecky S, Stremitzer S et al. Abdominal Dressing – ein neuer Standard in der Behandlung des offenen Abdomens infolge sekundärer Peritonitis?.  Zentralbl Chir. 2006;  131 S111-S114
  • 40 Cheatham M L, Safcsak K. Longterm impact of abdominal decompression: a prospective comparative analysis.  J Am Coll Surg. 2008;  207 573-579

Dr. S. Utzolino

Universitätsklinik · Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie

Hugstetterstraße 55

79106 Freiburg

Deutschland

Phone: 07 61 / 2 70 25 90

Fax: 07 61 / 2 70 26 16

Email: stefan.utzolino@uniklinik-freiburg.de

    >