Endoscopy 2011; 43(6): 518-525
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256333
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage of pancreatic duct obstruction: long-term outcome

M.  Ergun1 , T.  Aouattah1 , C.  Gillain1 , J.-F.  Gigot2 , C.  Hubert2 , P.  H.  Deprez1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • 2Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 12 March 2010

accepted after revision 10 December 2010

Publication Date:
24 March 2011 (online)

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) has been reported as an alternative to surgery, when transpapillary access to the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is impossible. The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of the procedure and long-term clinical outcome in patients treated with EUS-PD.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed our single-center experience over a 10-year period.

Results: EUS-PD was attempted in 20 patients (24 interventions), with a median age of 64 years (range 36 – 78). Indications for the procedure were post-Whipple symptomatic anastomotic stricture (n = 10) and chronic pancreatitis (n = 10). EUS-PD was performed by a transgastric (n = 16) or transbulbar (n = 3) route or with a rendezvous technique (n = 5). Wirsungography was performed in all interventions and successful drainage was achieved in 18 / 20 (90 %) patients. There were two minor procedure-related complications: bleeding that was treated endoscopically, and a perigastric collection that resolved spontaneously. Median follow up was 37 months (range 3 – 120 months), stent dysfunction occurred in 9 / 18 (50 %) patients. Out of 18 patients with successful EUS-PD, long-term pain resolution was observed in 13 (72 %). At the last follow-up visit, there were significant decreases in pain scores, from 7.5 to 1.6, and in MPD size from 8.1 mm to 3.9 mm. Failure was associated with cancer presence or recurrence.

Conclusions: Technical success rate of EUS-PD and clinical long-term pain resolution were 90 % and 72 %, respectively. EUS-PD is a reliable procedure with a low complication rate. It might therefore replace surgery at expert centers.

References

  • 1 Lankisch P G, Seidensticker F, Lohr-Happe A et al. The course of pain is the same in alcohol- and nonalcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis.  Pancreas. 1995;  10 338-341
  • 2 Karanjia N D, Reber H A. The cause and management of the pain of chronic pancreatitis.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990;  19 895-904
  • 3 Cahen D L, Gouma D J, Nio Y et al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 676-684
  • 4 Schnelldorfer T, Adams D B. Outcome after lateral pancreaticojejunostomy in patients with chronic pancreatitis associated with pancreas divisum.  Am Surg. 2003;  69 1041-1046
  • 5 Byrne R L, Gompertz R H, Venables C W. Surgery for chronic pancreatitis: a review of 12 years experience.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;  79 405-409
  • 6 Kalady M F, Broome A H, Meyers W C et al. Immediate and long-term outcomes after lateral pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis.  Am Surg. 2001;  67 478-483
  • 7 Cremer M, Devière J, Delhaye M et al. Stenting in severe chronic pancreatitis: results of medium-term follow-up in seventy-six patients.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 171-176
  • 8 Costamagna G, Bulajic M, Tringali A et al. Multiple stenting of refractory pancreatic duct strictures in severe chronic pancreatitis: long-term results.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 254-259
  • 9 Fink A S, Perez de Ayala V, Chapman M et al. Radiologic pitfalls in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography.  Pancreas. 1986;  1 180-187
  • 10 Kahaleh M, Hernandez A J, Tokar J et al. EUS-guided pancreatico-gastrostomy: analysis of its efficacy to drain inaccessible pancreatic ducts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 224-230
  • 11 François E, Kahaleh M, Giovannini M et al. EUS guided pancreaticogastrostomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 128-133
  • 12 Kahaleh M, Yoshida C, Yeaton P. EUS antegrade pancreatography with gastropancreatic duct stent placement. Review of two cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  6 919-923
  • 13 Tessier G, Bories E, Arvanitakis M et al. EUS-guided pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatobulbostomy for the treatment of pain in patients with pancreatic ductal dilatation inaccessible for transpapillary endoscopic therapy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 233-241
  • 14 Bataille L, Deprez P. A new application for therapeutic EUS: main pancreatic duct drainage with a ‘‘pancreatic rendezvous technique’’.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 740-743
  • 15 Mallery S, Matlock J, Freeman M L. EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts: report of six cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 100-107
  • 16 Will U, Meyer F, Manger T, Wanzar I. Endoscopic ultrasound assisted rendezvous maneuver to achieve pancreatic duct drainage in obstructive chronic pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 171-173
  • 17 Shami V M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholangio-pancreatography and rendezvous techniques.  Dig Liver Dis. 2010;  4 19-424 Epub 2009 Nov 9
  • 18 Wiersema M J, Sandusky D, Carr R et al. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  4 102-106
  • 19 Gress F, Ikenberry S, Sherman S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-directed pancreatography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 736-739
  • 20 Gunaratnam N T, Sarma A V, Norton I D, Wiersema M J. A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 316-324
  • 21 Giovannini M, Binmoeller K, Seifert H. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cystogastrostomy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 239-245
  • 22 Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland A L et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 473-477
  • 23 Giovannini M. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound and elastosonoendoscopy.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;  23 767-779
  • 24 Iglesias García J J, Lariño Noia J, Alvarez Castro A et al. Second-generation endoscopic ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Pancreatic cancer vs. inflammatory mass in chronic pancreatitis.  Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;  101 723-730

P. H. DeprezMD 

Gastroenterology Department
Cliniques universitaires St-Luc
Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL)

Avenue Hippocrate 10
1200 Brussels
Belgium

Fax: +32-2-7648927

Email: pierrehenri.deprez@uclouvain.be

    >