PDF herunterladen
Krankenhaushygiene up2date 2011; 6(1): 9-25
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256234
Hygienemaßnahmen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bündel zur Prävention nosokomialer Infektionen

Roland  Schulze-Röbbecke
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
10. März 2011 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Kernaussagen

  • Mit „Bündeln” gelingt es, die Qualität der Patientenversorgung messbar zu verbessern.

  • Als „Bündel” wird eine Gruppe von (meist 3 – 6) evidenzbasierten Interventionsmaßnahmen bezeichnet, die gemeinsam implementiert werden.

  • Eine größere Zahl von Studien konnte zeigen, dass sich die Häufigkeit bestimmter nosokomialer Infektionen drastisch verringern lässt, wenn als Bündelkomponenten solche Maßnahmen gewählt werden, deren infektionspräventive Wirksamkeit möglichst gut belegt ist und wenn diese Maßnahmen mit hoher Compliance (möglichst > 95 %) umgesetzt werden.

  • Essenziell für die Implementierung eines Bündels ist die Information und Fortbildung des medizinischen Personals, eine klare Regelung der Zuständigkeiten, gute Teamarbeit, die kontinuierliche Messung der Compliance und die Surveillance des zu beeinflussenden klinischen Outcomes (z. B. Infektionsfälle) sowie das Feedback der gemessenen Compliance– und Infektionsdaten an das zuständige Personal.

  • Einige schwere nosokomiale Infektionen, insbes. Beatmungspneumonien und gefäßkatheterassoziierte Blutstrominfektionen, wurden mit Bündeln so erfolgreich bekämpft, dass seit Kurzem erstmals ernsthaft über die Möglichkeit der Elimination nosokomialer Infektionen nachgedacht wird.

  • Innerhalb einer Gesamtstrategie zur Verbesserung der Patientenversorgung sind Bündel ein wichtiges Instrument zur Verbesserung der Patientensicherheit.

Literatur

  • 1 Cardo D, Dennehy P H, Halverson P et al. HAI Elimination white paper writing group. Moving toward elimination of healthcare-associated infections: a call to action.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;  31 1101-1105
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sackett D L, Rosenberg W M, Gray J A et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t.  Brit Med J. 1996;  312 71-72
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Labeau S O, Vandijck D M, Brusselaers N et al. Reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia: enhancing knowledge is important.  Intensive Care Med. 2009;  35 1118-1119
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Cook D J, Mulrow C D, Haynes R B. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.  Ann Intern Med. 1997;  126 376-380
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berenholtz S M, Pronovost P J, Lipsett P A et al. Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.  Crit Care Med. 2004;  32 2014-2020
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Resar R K. Making noncatastrophic health care processes reliable: Learning to walk before running in creating high-reliability organizations.  Health Serv Res. 2006;  41 1677-1689
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2725-2732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Haraden C. What is a bundle? . Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2006 http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/CriticalCare/IntensiveCare/ImprovementStories/WhatIsaBundle.htm (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.  Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;  51 (No.RR-10) 1-29
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Resar R, Pronovost P, Haraden C et al. Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;  31 243-248
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Marwick C, Davey P. Care bundles: the holy grail of infectious risk management in hospital?.  Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;  22 364-369
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cocanour C S, Peninger M, Domonoske B D et al. Decreasing ventilator-associated pneumonia in a trauma ICU.  J Trauma. 2006;  61 22-129
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Institute for Healthcare Improvement .Getting Started Kit: Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia How-to Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2007 http://www.premierinc.com/safety/topics/bundling/downloads/03-vap-how-to-guide.pdf (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Pronovost P J, Berenholtz S M, Ngo K et al. Developing and pilot testing quality indicators in the intensive care unit.  J Crit Care. 2003;  18 145-155
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wip C, Napolitano L. Bundles to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: how valuable are they?.  Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;  22 159-166
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jain M, Miller L, Belt D et al. Decline in ICU adverse events, nosocomial infections and cost through a quality improvement initiative focusing on teamwork and culture change.  Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;  15 235-239
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 O’Keefe-McCarthy S, Santiago C, Lau G. Ventilator-associated pneumonia bundled strategies: an evidence-based practice.  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008;  5 193-204
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Halton K A, Cook D, Paterson D L et al. Cost-effectiveness of a central venous catheter care bundle.  PLoS One. 2010;  5 e12815 1-11
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Bouadma L, Mourvillier B, Deiler V et al. A multifaceted program to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: impact on compliance with preventive measures.  Crit Care Med. 2010;  38 789-796
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Guthrie B, Wyke S. Clinical trials or quality improvement for evaluating effectiveness of interventions? . University of Dundee and the Alliance for Self Care Research; 2008 http://www.nhstayside.scot.nhs.uk/about_nhstay/commitees/08_iaq/27012009/docs_024499.pdf (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Marra A R, Cal R G, Silva C V et al. Successful prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in an intensive care setting.  Am J Infect Control. 2009;  37 619-625
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Institute for Healthcare Improvement .Getting Started Kit: Prevent Central Line Infections How-to Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; ca. 2005 (ohne Jahr) http://www.100kliveswashington.org/resources/CLI-HowtoGuide.pdf (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Wachter R M, Pronovost P J. The 100 000 Lives Campaign: a scientific and policy review.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;  32 621-627
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Zilberberg M D, Shorr A F, Kollef M H. Implementing quality improvements in the intensive care unit: ventilator bundle as an example.  Crit Care Med. 2009;  3791 305-309
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Mayer J, Mooney B, Gundlapalli A et al. Dissemination and sustainability of a hospital-wide hand hygiene program emphasizing positive reinforcement.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;  32 59-66
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Anthony T, Murray B W, Sum-Ping J T et al. Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: A Randomized Trial.  Arch Surg. 2010;  (epub ahead of print)
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Anonymous .VAP prevention bundle, guidance for implementation. Edinburgh: Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group; 2008 http://www.sicsag.scot.nhs.uk/SubGroup/VAP_Prevention_Bundle_Guidance_For_Implementation1.pdf (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Institute for Healthcare Improvement .Getting Started Kit: Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia How-to Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2010 http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/VAP.htm (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Bigham M T, Amato R, Bondurrant P et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in the pediatric intensive care unit: characterizing the problem and implementing a sustainable solution.  J Pediatr. 2009;  154 582-587
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections among patients in intensive care units – Pennsylvania, April 2001 – March 2005.  Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;  54 1013-1016
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Apisarnthanarak A, Thongphubeth K, Yuekyen C et al. Effectiveness of a catheter-associated bloodstream infection bundle in a Thai tertiary care center: a 3-year study.  Am J Infect Control. 2010;  38 449 – 455
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Zack J. Zeroing in on zero tolerance for central line-associated bacteremia.  Am J Infect Control. 2008;  36 S176.e1-S176.e2
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Miller M R, Griswold M, Harris J M et al. Decreasing PICU catheter-associated bloodstream infections: NACHRI’s quality transformation efforts.  Pediatrics. 2010;  125 206-213
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Venkatram S, Rachmale S, Kanna B. Study of device use adjusted rates in health care-associated infections after implementation of „bundles” in a closed-model medical intensive care unit.  J Crit Care. 2010;  25 174.e11-88
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Guerin K, Wagner J, Rains K, Bessesen M. Reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections by implementation of a postinsertion care bundle.  Am J Infect Control. 2010;  38 430-433
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Institute for Healthcare Improvement .Getting Started Kit: Prevent Surgical Site Infections How-to Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008 http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/SSI.htm (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Liau K H, Aung K T, Chua N et al. Outcome of a strategy to reduce surgical site infection in a tertiary-care hospital.  Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010;  11 151-159
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Graf K, Sohr D, Haverich A et al. Decrease of deep sternal surgical site infection rates after cardiac surgery by a comprehensive infection control program.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;  9 282-286
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ryckman F C, Schoettker P J, Hays K R et al. Reducing surgical site infections at a pediatric academic medical center.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;  35 192-198
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Acklin Y P, Widmer A F, Renner R M et al. Unexpectedly increased rate of surgical site infections following implant surgery for hip fractures: problem solution with the bundle approach.  Injury. 2010;  (Epub ahead of print)
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Awad S S, Palacio C H, Subramanian A et al. Implementation of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevention bundle results in decreased MRSA surgical site infections.  Am J Surg. 2009;  198 607-610
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Saint S, Olmsted R N, Fakih M G et al. Translating health care-associated urinary tract infection prevention research into practice via the bladder bundle.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;  35 449-455
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Institute for Healthcare Improvement .Getting Started Kit: Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009 http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/ImprovementMap/PreventCatheterAssociatedUrinaryTractInfections.htm (Letzter Zugriff: 03.01.2011)
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Leverstein-van H all, Hopmans T E, van der Sprenkel J W et al. A bundle approach to reduce the incidence of external ventricular and lumbar drain-related infections.  J Neurosurg. 2010;  112 345-353
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. med. Roland Schulze-Röbbecke

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

Universitätsstraße 140225 Düsseldorf

Telefon: 0211/8112906

eMail: schulzrr@uni-duesseldorf.de

      >