J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26(7): 461-469
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1254230
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Perforator Vessel Recipient Options in the Lower Extremity: An Anatomically Based Approach to Safer Limb Salvage

Nicholas Haddock1 , Evan S. Garfein2 , Derek Reformat2 , Elizabeth Hecht3 , Jamie Levine1 , Pierre Saadeh1
  • 1Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
  • 2Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
  • 3Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 May 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

When free tissue transfer is employed for defects of the lower third of the leg, recipient anastomoses are typically performed to major vessels. The aim of this study was to assess soleal perforators located in the distal half of the leg as potential vessels for free flap recipient vessels. Six fresh cadavers (12 limbs) were dissected. Perforators of adequate size (≥1 mm) were documented as was the location and ease of dissection. Lower extremity magnetic resonance angiograms (MRAs) of 18 extremities were retrospectively reviewed. Two free tissue transfers to lower extremity perforators were presented. Soleal perforators most reliably matched our recipient vessel requirements. Perforators were of adequate size to support free tissue transfer, easy to dissect, and were located at mid/distal fibula level. MRA evaluation confirmed these results. One free tissue reconstruction was performed for trauma (posterior tibial perforator) and one was performed for a chronic radiation wound (peroneal perforator). The soleus muscle is easily exposed and is supplied distally by perforators from both the posterior tibial and the peroneal artery systems. These perforating branches are more accessible than the major lower extremity arteries, making the exposure and anastomosis technically easier and sparing potential iatrogenic injury to critical vessels.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  91(4) 678-683
  • 2 Allen R J, Heitmann C. Perforator flaps—the history of evolution.  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2002;  34(4) 216-218
  • 3 Allen R J, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32(1) 32-38
  • 4 Allen R J, Tucker Jr C. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95(7) 1207-1212
  • 5 Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Siebert J. Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap without muscle.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  96(7) 1608-1614
  • 6 Kim D Y, Cho S Y, Kim K S, Lee S Y, Cho B H. Correction of axillary burn scar contracture with the thoracodorsal perforator-based cutaneous island flap.  Ann Plast Surg. 2000;  44(2) 181-187
  • 7 Cavadas P C, Sanz-Giménez-Rico J R, Gutierrez-de la Cámara A, Navarro-Monzonís A, Soler-Nomdedeu S, Martínez-Soriano F. The medial sural artery perforator free flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108(6) 1609-1615 discussion 1616-1617
  • 8 Wei F C, Jain V, Suominen S, Chen H C. Confusion among perforator flaps: what is a true perforator flap?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107(3) 874-876
  • 9 Blondeel P N, Van Landuyt K H, Monstrey S J et al.. The “Gent” consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112(5) 1378-1383, quiz 1383, 1516, discussion 1384–1387
  • 10 Geddes C R, Morris S F, Neligan P C. Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  50(1) 90-99
  • 11 Yaremchuk M J, Brumback R J, Manson P N, Burgess A R, Poka A, Weiland A J. Acute and definitive management of traumatic osteocutaneous defects of the lower extremity.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;  80(1) 1-14
  • 12 Attinger C. Soft-tissue coverage for lower-extremity trauma.  Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;  26(2) 295-334
  • 13 Park M C, Lee J H, Chung J, Lee S H. Use of internal mammary vessel perforator as a recipient vessel for free TRAM breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  50(2) 132-137
  • 14 Guzzetti T, Thione A. Successful breast reconstruction with a perforator to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.  Ann Plast Surg. 2001;  46(6) 641-643
  • 15 Gustilo R B, Anderson J T. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;  58(4) 453-458
  • 16 Gustilo R B, Gruninger R P, Davis T. Classification of type III (severe) open fractures relative to treatment and results.  Orthopedics. 1987;  10(12) 1781-1788
  • 17 Gustilo R B, Mendoza R M, Williams D N. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures.  J Trauma. 1984;  24(8) 742-746
  • 18 Kim D, Orron D E, Skillman J J. Surgical significance of popliteal arterial variants. A unified angiographic classification.  Ann Surg. 1989;  210(6) 776-781
  • 19 Margiotta M S, Markowitz B, Shaw W. Routine angiography in free fibula flap reconstruction.  Plast Surg Forum. 1997;  20 102
  • 20 Young D M, Trabulsy P P, Anthony J P. The need for preoperative leg angiography in fibula free flaps.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1994;  10(5) 283-287 discussion 287-289
  • 21 Saint-Cyr M, Schaverien M, Arbique G, Hatef D, Brown S A, Rohrich R J. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography and venography for the investigation of the vascular anatomy and perfusion of perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121(3) 772-780
  • 22 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Brown S A, Rohrich R J. Three- and four-dimensional arterial and venous anatomies of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121(5) 1578-1587
  • 23 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Hatef D, Brown S A, Rohrich R J. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography and venography of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121(5) 1685-1696
  • 24 Fukaya E, Grossman R F, Saloner D, Leon P, Nozaki M, Mathes S J. Magnetic resonance angiography for free fibula flap transfer.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2007;  23(4) 205-211
  • 25 Wong C H, Tan B K, Wei F C, Song C. Use of the soleus musculocutaneous perforator for skin paddle salvage of the fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap: anatomical study and clinical confirmation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120(6) 1576-1584
  • 26 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M. Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122(1) 161-170

Pierre SaadehM.D. 

Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center

560 First Avenue, TCH-169, New York, NY 10016

Email: Pierre.Saadeh@nyumc.org

    >