Effect of Leg Length on ROM, VJ and Leg Dexterity in Dance

Abstract

We investigated the associations between leg length and specific ballet movements in different skill groups. Volunteers were from an undergraduate dance programme (n=18), a pre-professional school (n=43) and from an elite classical ballet company (n=45). Individual data were collected for anthropometry, vertical jump, leg dexterity, and leg active and passive ROM. ANCOVA identified both main effects as significant with regard to vertical jump (gender P<0.001 and skill P=0.017); leg length was also identified as a significant covariate (P=0.023). Analysis of leg dexterity identified no significant effects with gender, skill or leg length. Active and passive range of motion noted gender (P=0.001) and skill (P<0.001) differences. Leg length was found to be negatively associated with both active and passive ROM (P=0.002). In conclusion, the present data highlight the diverse and conflicting effects of leg length on fundamental ballet skills. The longer legs that benefit vertical jump have a negative influence on range of motion and leg dexterity except for highly skilled dancers, who through skill, seem to have overcome the effects of some of these dichotomies.

Key words

anthropometric - ballet - tendus - jump height - flexibility

References

• 1 Alizedah A, Masiha M. The relationship between flexibility measurements and length of body segments. In Kinanthropometry VIII: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.. Manchester, UK: Routledge; 2001
• 2 Alter MJ. Science of flexibility.. 2nd ed, Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 1996
• 3 Balady GJ, Berra KA, Golding LA, Gordon NF, Mahler DA, Myers JN, Sheldahl LM. Acsm's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.. 6th ed. Franklin BA, Whaley MH, Howley ET Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000
• 4 Bales M, Nettl-Fiol R. The body eclectic: Evolving practices in dance training.. Illinois: University of Illinois Press; 2008: 500
• 5 Behm DG, Bambury A, Cahill F, Power K. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2004;  36 1397-1402
• 6 Caruso JF, Ramey E, Hastings LP, Monda JK, Coday MA, McLagan J, Drummond J. Anthropometry as a predictor of high speed performance.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 522-525
• 7 Connolly K, Forssberg H. Neurophysiology and neuropsychology of motor development.. Cambridge: Mac Keith Press; 1997: 387
• 8 Cramer J, Housh T, Weir J, GO J, Coburn J, Beck T. The acute effects of static stretching on peak torque, mean power output, electromyography, and mechanomyography.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;  93 530-539
• 9 de Garay A, Levine L, Carter JEL. Genetic and anthropological studies of olympic athletes. In: T. Battinelli, (ed). Physique and Fitness. New York: Human Sciences Press Inc; 1989
• 10 Deighan M. Flexibility in dance.  J Dance Med Sci. 2005;  9 13-17
• 11 Gabbett T, Georgieff B. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of Australian junior national, state and novice volleyball players.  J Strength Cond Res. 2007;  21 902-908
• 12 Gomez T, Beach G, Cooke C, Hrudey W, Goyert P. Normative database for trunk range of motion, strength, velocity, and endurance with the isostation b-200 lumbar dynamometer.  Spine. 1991;  16 15-21
• 13 Grant S, Hynes V, Whittaker A, Aitchinson T. Anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of elite and recreational climbers.  J Sports Sci. 1996;  14 301-309
• 14 Grossman G, Wilmerding M. The effect of conditioning on the height of dancer's extension in a la seconde.  J Dance Med Sci. 2000;  4 117-121
• 15 Hamilton L, Brooks-Gunn J, Warren M, Hamilton W. The impact of thinness and dieting on the professional ballet dancer.  Med Prob Perf Art. 1987;  2 117-122
• 16 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 701-702
• 17 Koutedakis Y, Jamurtas A. The dancer as a performing athlete: Physiological considerations.  Sport Med. 2004;  34 651-661
• 18 Koutedakis Y, Owolabi E, Apostolos M. Dance biomechanics: A tool for controlling health, fitness, and training.  J Dance Med Sci. 2008;  12 83-90
• 19 Koutedakis Y, Sharp NCC. The fit and healthy dancer.. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1999
• 20 Krivickas L. Training flexibility.. In: Frontera W, Slovik D, Dawson D, (eds). Exercise in rehabilitation medicine. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 2006
• 21 Monahan J. The nature of ballet: A critic's reflections.. London: Pitman; 1976: 122
• 22 Nevill A, Tsiotra G, Tsimeas P, Koutedakis Y. Allometric associations between body size, shape, and physical performance of Greek children.  Ped Exerc Sci. 2009;  21 220-232
• 23 Paskevska A. Ballet beyond tradition.. London: Taylor & Francis; 2004
• 24 Peeler J, Anderson J. Reliability of the Thomas test for assessing range of motion about the hip.  Phys Ther Sport. 2009;  8 14-21
• 25 Ryan AJ, Stephens RE. The Dancer's Complete Guide to Healthcare.. London: Dance Books; 1998
• 26 Twitchett E. Physiological demands of performance in classical ballet and their relationships with injury and aesthetic components. School of Sport, Performing Arts and Leisure. University of Wolverhampton; 2009: 215
• 27 Twitchett E, Koutedakis Y, Wyon M. Physical fitness and classical ballet performance: A literature review.  J Strength Cond Res. 2009;  23 2732-2740
• 28 Walsh E, Wright G. Inertia, resonant frequency, stiffness and kinetic energy of the human forearm.  Q J Exp Physiol. 1987;  73 161-170
• 29 Wyon M. Testing the aesthetic athlete.. In: Winter E, Jones A, Davison R, Bromley P, Mercer T, (eds). Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines: British Association of Sport and Exercise Science Testing Guidelines. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group; 2007: 249-262
• 30 Xarez L. Vertical jumping in dance: Feet positions, type of support, body composition, morphology, level of expertise and height flight.  Port J Human Perf Stud. 1993;  9 47-50

Correspondence