ABSTRACT
This study evaluated changes in repair strategy use by adult cochlear implantees following
a communication training program that emphasized the use of communication repair strategies.
Fifteen subjects, male and female, pre- and postlingually deafened adults, participated.
The experimental group completed a four-session training program. The control group
received no intervention. Evaluations were performed preintervention, postintervention,
and at a 5- to 7-week follow-up with both familiar and unfamiliar communication partners.
A video analysis technique was implemented. Video analysis showed that subjects often
requested repetition (verbal/nonverbal), confirmation, or repetition of a specific
portion of an utterance. Other repair strategies were rarely used. Results showed
no significant change in the use of repair strategies for the control or experimental
groups. Findings suggest that the training program was not effective with the present
subject group or that the video analysis measure was not sufficiently sensitive to
detect a change in communication behavior. It is suggested that some repair strategies
may not comply with the rules of normal conversation.
KEYWORDS
Cochlear implantee - specific repair strategy - nonspecific repair strategy - communication
training - video analysis measure - communication partner
REFERENCES
- 1 Plant G.
Adult rehabilitation. In: Cooper H, Craddock LC Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide. London, United Kingdom;
Whurr 2006: 299-321
- 2 Erber N P. Communication Therapy for Hearing Impaired Adults. Melbourne, Australia;
Clavis 1988
- 3 Erber N P. Communication and Adult Hearing Loss. Melbourne, Australia; Clavis 1993
- 4
Tye-Murray N.
Communication strategies training.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol Monograph Supplement.
1994;
27
193-207
- 5
Tye-Murray N, Witt S.
Communication strategies training.
Semin Hear.
1997;
18
153-166
- 6
Tye-Murray N, Knutson J F, Lemke J H.
Assessment of communication strategies use: questionnaires and daily diaries.
Semin Hear.
1993;
14
338-349
- 7 Trychin S. Relaxation Training for Hard of Hearing People. Bethesda, MD; SHHH Publications
1987
- 8 Trychin S, Boone N. Communication Rules for Hard of Hearing People: A Workbook for
the Right and Wrong Ways for Effective Communication. Washington, DC; Gallaudet University
Press 1987
- 9
Caissie R, Rockwell E.
Communication difficulties experienced by nursing home residents with a hearing loss
during conversation with staff members.
J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol.
1994;
18
127-134
- 10
Gibson C L, Caissie R.
The effectiveness of repair strategy intervention with a hearing impaired adult.
J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol.
1994;
18
14-21
- 11
Lind C, Hickson L, Erber N.
Conversation repair and acquired hearing impairment: a preliminary quantitative clinical
study.
Aust N Z J Audiol.
2004;
26
40-52
- 12
Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L.
Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversations with adult
cochlear implant users.
Ear Hear.
1995;
16
459-469
- 13
Gagné J-P, Wyllie K A.
Relative effectiveness of three repair strategies on the visual-identification of
misperceived words.
Ear Hear.
1989;
10
368-374
- 14
Tye-Murray N, Purdy S C, Woodworth G G, Tyler R S.
Effects of repair strategies on visual identification of sentences.
J Speech Hear Disord.
1990;
55
621-627
- 15
Owens E, Telleen C C.
Tracking as an aural rehabilitative process.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1981;
14
259-272
- 16
Tye-Murray N.
Repair strategy usage by hearing impaired adults and changes following communication
therapy.
J Speech Hear Res.
1991;
34
921-928
- 17
Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L, Sobaski C.
Communication breakdowns: partner contingencies and partner reactions.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1994;
27
107-133
- 18
Lansing C R.
Communication management strategies requested by experienced cochlear implant user.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1992;
25
130-145
- 19
Prutting C A, Kirchner D M.
A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language.
J Speech Hear Disord.
1987;
52
105-119
- 20
Caissie R, Rockwell E.
A video analysis procedure for assessing conversational fluency in hearing impaired
adults.
Ear Hear.
1993;
14
202-209
- 21
Gagné J-P, Stelmacovich P, Yovetich W.
Reactions to requests for clarification used by hearing impaired individuals.
Volta Review.
1991;
93
129-143
- 22 Dawe A, Donavan C, Caissie R. Normally hearing and hearing impaired adults' conversational
performance in quiet and in noise. Poster presented at Canadian Association of Speech
Language Pathologists and Audiologists Conference 1995 Ottawa, Canada;
- 23
Hickson L, Worrall L.
Beyond hearing aid fitting: improving communication for older adults.
Int J Audiol.
2003;
42
84-91
- 24
Gallagher T M.
Contingent query sequences within adult-child discourse.
J Child Lang.
1981;
8
51-62
- 25 Luterman D. Counselling the Communicatively Disordered and Their Families. Boston,
MA; Little, Brown 1984
- 26
Schlegoff E A, Jefferson G, Sacks H.
The preference for self correction in the organisation of repair in conversation.
Language.
1977;
53
361-382
- 27 Garvey C.
The contingent query: a dependent act in conversation. In: Lewis M, Rosenblum LA Interaction, Conversation, and the Development of Language. New
York, NY; Wiley 1977
- 28
Gallagher T.
Revision behaviors in the speech of normal children developing language.
J Speech Hear Res.
1977;
20
303-318
- 29
Caissie R, Gibson C.
The effectiveness of repair strategies used by people with hearing losses and their
conversational partners.
Volta Review.
1997;
99(4)
203-218
- 30 Erber N P, Lind C.
Communication therapy: theory and practice. In: Gagne J-P, Tye-Murray N Research in Audiological Rehabilitation: Current Trends
and Future Directions. J Acad Rehab Audiol Monograph 1994 2(Suppl): 267-287
- 31
Lansing C R, Seyfried D N.
Longitudinal changes in personal adjustment to hearing loss in adult cochlear implant
users.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1990;
23
63-77
Karen Sparrow
Speech Pathology & Audiology, Flinders University
P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, Australia 5001
Email: karen.sparrow@flinders.edu.au
