Download PDF
Semin Hear 2010; 31(1): 015-027
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246321
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Relationship between Expectations and Satisfaction for Baha Implant System in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness

Craig W. Newman1 , Sharon A. Sandridge1 , Lisa M. Oswald2
  • 1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 2The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 March 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The Baha auditory osseointegrated implant system is gaining clinical acceptance as an alternative treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). As satisfaction is related to expectations, if postfitting performance with the Baha matches or exceeds initial expectations, the patient may consider this management a success and have satisfaction with treatment outcome. In contrast, unrealistically high preoperative expectations for this management approach may result in dissatisfaction if performance falls short after the sound processor is fitted. The present study explores the relationship between prefitting expectations and postfitting satisfaction in a sample of 10 patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The Expected Consequences of Hearing Aid Ownership (ECHO) questionnaire was administered before fitting the Baha, and its companion questionnaire, namely the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL), was administered at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postfitting. No significant differences were observed between the ECHO and SADL administrations. Scatter plots were generated to examine the relationship between expectations and satisfaction. Overall, patients were more satisfied with Baha use than initially expected, and satisfaction was maintained over an 18-month period. Establishment of initial realistic expectations and ongoing counseling are highlighted as essential components of the rehabilitation process when using Baha implantable technology in the management of patients with SSD.

KEYWORDS

Baha - single-sided deafness - expectations - satisfaction

REFERENCES

  • 1 Baguley D M, Bird J, Humphriss R L, Prevost A T. The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;  31 6-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Choissoine-Kerdel J A, Baguley D M, Stoddart R L et al.. An investigation of the audiological handicap associated with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss.  Am J Otol. 2000;  21 645-651
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Welsh L M, Welsh J J, Rosen L F, Dragonette J E. Functional impairments due to unilateral deafness.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;  113 987-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Newman C, Weinstein B, Jacobson G, Hug G. The hearing handicap inventory for adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates.  Ear Hear. 1990;  11 430-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Newman C W, Jacobson G P, Hug G A, Sandridge S A. Perceived hearing handicap of patients with unilateral or mild hearing loss.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;  106 210-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Harford E, Barry J. A rehabilitative approach to the problem of unilateral hearing impairment: the contralateral routing of signals.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1965;  30 121-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Punch J. CROS revisited.  ASHA. 1988;  30(2) 35-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Valente M, Potts L G, Valente M, Goebel J. Wireless CROS versus transcranial CROS for unilateral hearing loss.  Am J Audiol. 1995;  4 52-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sammeth C A, Cire G. Effectiveness in treating single-sided deafness with the Baha system.  Hear Rev. 2009;  16(4) 34-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Spitzer J B, Ghossaini S N, Wazen J J. Evolving applications in the use of bone-anchored hearing aids.  Am J Audiol. 2002;  11 96-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Spitzer J B, Mancuso D M. Assessment for implantable technologies. In: Montano JJ, Spitzer JB Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation. San Diego, CA; Plural Publishing 2009: 126-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bosman A J, Hol M KS, Snik A FM, Mylanus A M, Cremers C WR. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness.  Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;  123 258-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Niparko J K, Cox K M, Lustig L R. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.  Otol Neurotol. 2003;  24 73-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wazen J J, Spitzer J B, Ghossaini S N et al.. Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129 248-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hol M KS, Bosman A J, Snik A FM, Mylanus E AM. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.  Audiol Neurootol. 2004;  9 274-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lin L M, Bowditch S, Anderson M J et al.. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27 172-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Newman C W, Sandridge S A, Wodzisz L M. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29 1123-1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kolter P, Clark R. Marketing for Health Care Organizations. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice Hall 1987
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gatehouse S. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit.  Ear Hear. 1994;  15 30-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jerram J CK, Purdy S C. Technology, expectations, and adjustment to hearing loss: predictors of hearing aid outcome.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;  12 64-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Norman M, George C R, McCarthy D. The effect of pre-fitting counseling on the outcome of hearing aid fittings.  Scand Audiol. 1994;  23 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ziecheck J. Effect of Expectations on Hearing Aid Satisfaction and Performance [master's thesis]. Gainesville, FL; University of Florida 1993
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cox R M, Alexander G C. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;  1 368-382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brooks D N, Hallam R S. Attitudes to hearing difficulty and hearing aids and the outcome of audiological rehabilitation.  Br J Audiol. 1998;  32 217-226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kricos P, Lesner S, Sandridge S. Expectations of older adults regarding the use of hearing aids.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1991;  2 129-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Meister H, Lausberg I, Walger M, von Wedel H. Using conjoint analysis to examine the importance of hearing aid attributes.  Ear Hear. 2001;  22 342-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cox R M, Alexander G C. Measuring satisfaction with the amplification in daily life: the SADL scale.  Ear Hear. 1999;  20 306-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cox R M, Alexander G C. Validation of the SADL questionnaire.  Ear Hear. 2001;  22 151-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wazen J J, Spitzer J B, Kuller M. Localization by unilateral BAHA users.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;  132 928-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Craig W NewmanPh.D. 

Head & Neck Institute/A71, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue

Cleveland, OH 44195

Email: newmanc@ccf.org

      >