PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2009; 118(12): 648-653
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245101
Fortbildung
Zahnerhaltung/Produktkonzept
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Eine neue Technologie für Komposit–Füllungsmaterial

S. M. Newman1
  • 1University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Dental Medicine
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
21. Dezember 2009 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Im vergangenen Jahr wurde eine neue Technologie zur Herstellung eines gering schrumpfenden Komposit–Füllungsmaterials eingeführt, das im Gegensatz zu anderen Kompositen mit geringer Schrumpfung, vollständig kompatibel mit allen gängigen Dentin–/Schmelz–Bonding–Systemen ist. Das Füllersystem besteht aus einer innovativen Kombination von Glasfüllern. Die mit diesem Komposit vorgestellte neue Technologie wird mit konventionellen zahnärztlichen Füllungsmaterialien verglichen und es werden die Verbesserungen der Eigenschaften herausgestellt. Es ist erhältlich unter dem Handelsnamen N'Durance®.

Literatur

  • 1 3M/Espe, Filtek Supreme Plus Technisches Produktprofil. 5, 9–11. Online unter: www.solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/3M–ESPE/dental-professionals/products/category/direct-restorative/filtek-supreme-plus/ . 
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Alani AH, Toh CG.. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review.  Oper Dent. 1997;  22 173-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Archegas LR, Caldas DB, Rached RN. et al. . Sorption and solubility of composites cured with quartz–tungsten halogen and light emitting diode light–curing units.  J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;  9 73-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD. et al. . Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in randomized clinical trial.  J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;  138 775-783
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bonsor SJ.. Contemporary use of flowable resin composite materials.  Dent Update. 2008;  35 600-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bracho–Troconis C, Rudolph S, Boulden J. et al. .Characterization of a new dimer acid based resin nano–hybrid composite. AADR Abstract 0081: 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Braun AP, Grassi C Soares, Gluer H Carracho. et al. . Optical density and chemical composition of microfilled and microhybrid composite resins.  J Appl Oral Science. 2008;  16 132-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Calheiros FC, Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA. et al. . Influence of irradiant energy on degree of conversion, polymerization rate and shrinkage stress in an experimental resin composite system.  Dent Mater. 2008;  24 1164-1168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA. et al. . Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites.  Biomaterials. 1991;  12 737-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 da Silva EM, Poskus LT, Guimaraes JG.. Influence of light–polymerization modes on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites: a comparative analysis between a hybrid and a nanofilled composite.  Oper Dent. 2008;  33 287-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 de Gee AJ, Pallav P.. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine.  J Dent. 1994;  22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Della Bona A, Benetti P, Borba M. et al. . Flexural and diametral tensile strength of composite resins.  Braz Oral Res. 2008;  22 84-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Garcia JW, Shah PK, Bowman CN. et al. .Effects of reaction kinetics and conversion on photopolymerization stress development. AADR Abstract 0207: 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Goldberg M.. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review.  Clin Oral Investig. 2008;  12 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H. et al. . In vitro degradation of resin–dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy.  Biomaterials. 2003;  24 3795-3803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Koplin C, Jaeger R, Hahn P.. A material model for internal stress of dental composites caused by the curing process.  Dent Mater. 2009;  25 331-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ.. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations.  J Esthet Dent. 1999;  11 234-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lovell LG, Newman SM, Donaldson MM. et al. . The effect of light intensity on double bond conversion and flexural strength of a model, unfilled dental resin.  Dent Mater. 2003;  19 458-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lu H, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN.. Impact of curing protocol on conversion and shrinkage stress.  J Dent Res. 2005;  84 822-826
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lu H, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN.. Towards the elucidation of shrinkage stress development and relaxation in dental composites.  Dent Mater. 2004;  20 979-986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Newman SM, Sheth S, Stansbury SJ.. Polymerization shrinkage versus Conversion in Commercial Composites. IADR Abstract 0231: 2007
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Newman SM, Vilner L.. Fluoride release from resin cements and resin/glass ionomers. Abstract #2486.  J Dent Res. 1997;  76 324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rathbun MA, Craig RG, Hanks CT. et al. . Cytotoxicity of a Bis–GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents.  J Biomed Mat Res. 1991;  25 443-457
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A. et al. . Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials.  Oper Dent. 2003;  28 628-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sun J, Eidelman N, Lin–Gibson S.. 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X–ray micro–computed tomography to predict microleakage.  Dent Mater. 2009;  25 314-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Swift EJ, Ritter AV, Heymann HO. et al. . 36–month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.  Am J Dent. 2008;  21 148-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Trujillo–Lemon M, Ge J, Lu H. et al. . Dimethacrylate derivatives of Dimer Acid.  J Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2006;  44 3921-3929
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Turkun LS, Aktener O, Ates M.. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7–year report.  Quintessence Int. 2003;  34 418-426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 van Dijken JW, Wing KR, Ruyter IE.. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities.  Acta Odontol Scand. 1989;  47 401-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Van Dijken JWV, Ruyter IE, Holland RI.. Porosity in posterior composite resins.  Eur J Oral Sciences. 1986;  94 471-478
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yesil ZD, Alapati S, Johnston W. et al. . Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials.  J Prosthet Dent. 2008;  99 435-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yu B, Lee YK.. Translucency of varied brand and shade of resin composites.  Am J Dent. 2008;  21 229-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Sheldon M. Newman

Associate Professor Restorative Dentistry, Biomaterials UCD, Filzsimous

Biomaterials Mail Stop 8310

PO Box 6511 Aurora, Colorado, 80045

eMail: sheldon.newman@ucdenver.edu

      >