Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52(5/06): 254-258
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1242806
Case Report

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Resection of a Retroperitoneal Schwannoma: Case Report

T. Oktenoglu1 , S. Carilli2 , M. Sasani1 , A. F. Ozer1 , A. C. Sarioglu1
  • 1Neurosurgery Department, American Hospital, Nisantasi − Istanbul, Turkey
  • 2General Surgery Department, American Hospital, Nisantasi − Istanbul, Turkey
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 January 2010 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: Retroperitoneal schwannomas are rare tumors. The symptoms are usually non-specific and these lesions can only be demonstrated with advanced radiological methods. Posterior and anterior approaches can be used to remove retroperitoneal schwannomas. Traditional techniques carry significant risks.

Case Report: A 35-year-old man was admitted with a history of right leg pain of 3 months duration. He had received conservative treatment and physical therapy but none of these measures had been helpful. Findings on physical and neurological examinations were all within normal limits. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a retroperitoneal mass lesion medial to the right psoas muscle at the level of the S1 vertebra. The tumor was removed using an endoscopic transabdominal approach.

Conclusion: The endoscopic transabdominal approach is a safe, efficient and minimally invasive procedure compared to traditional methods also to remove retroperitoneal schwannomas in selected cases.

References

  • 1 Schwartz SI. Principles of Surgery. 7th edn., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill 1998
  • 2 Nah YW, Suh JH, Choi DH. et al . Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: surgical consideration.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;  52 1681-1684
  • 3 Weiss SW. Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. St Louis: Mosby 2001
  • 4 Hayasaka K, Tanaka Y, Soeda S. et al . MR findings in primary retroperitoneal schwannoma.  Acta Radiol. 1999;  40 78-82
  • 5 Robinson E, Bleankey RR, Ferguson PC. et al . Multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma.  Radiographics. 2008;  28 2069-2086
  • 6 Dickersin G. The electron microscopic spectrum of nerve sheath tumors.  Ultrastruct Pathol. 1987;  11 103-146
  • 7 Erlandson RA. Peripheral nerve sheath tumors.  Ultrastruct Pathol. 1985;  9 113-122
  • 8 Fisher ER, Vusevski VD. Cytogenesis of schwannomas (neurilemoma), neurofibroma, dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma as a revealed by electron microscopy.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1968;  49 141-154
  • 9 Harkin JC, Reed JC. Tumors of the Peripheral Nervous System. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Fascicle 3. Washington, DC, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology 1969
  • 10 Kransdorf MJ. Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  164 395-402
  • 11 Kransdorf MJ. Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of diagnoses by age, sex, and location.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  164 129-134
  • 12 Schindler OS, Dixon JH, Case P. Retroperitoneal giant schwannomas: report on two cases and review of the literature.  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2002;  10 77-84
  • 13 Takatera H, Takiuchi H, Namiki M. et al . Retroperitoneal schwannoma.  Urology. 1986;  28 529-531
  • 14 Singh V, Kapoor R. Atypical presentations of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: report of three cases with review of literature.  Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;  37 547-549
  • 15 Kim SH, Choi BI, Han MC. et al . Retroperitoneal neurilemoma: CT and MR findings.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;  159 1023-1026
  • 16 Daneshmand S, Youssefzadeh D, Chamie K. et al . Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: a case series and review of the literature.  Urology. 2003;  62 993-997
  • 17 Muller SA, Treutner KH, Tietze H. et al . Efficacy of adhesion prevention and impact on wound healing of intraperitoneal phospholipids.  J Surg Res. 2001;  96 68-74
  • 18 Beck DE, Opelka FG, Bailey HR. et al . Incidence of small bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 241-248
  • 19 Scovill WA. Small bowel obstruction. In: Cameron JL, ed. Current Surgical Therapy 5th edition. Mosby-Year book, Inc. St. Louis, Missouri 1995: 100-104
  • 20 Treutner KH, Bertam P, Lvser S. et al . Prevention and treatment of peritoneal adhesions- A questionnaire survey on 1 200 hospitals in Germany.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 398-403
  • 21 Wilson MS, Ellis H, Menzies D. et al . A review of the management of small bowel obstruction.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;  81 320-328
  • 22 Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.  Spine. 1997;  22 691-699
  • 23 Carilli S, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. Open-window laparotomy during transperitoneal approach to the lower lumbar vertebrae: new method for reducing complications.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2006;  49 227-229
  • 24 Pinto D, Kaidar-Person O, Cho M. et al . Laparoscopic resection of a retroperitoneal degenerative schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;  18 121-123
  • 25 Konstantinidis K, Theodoropoulos GE, Sambalis G. et al . Laparoscopic resection of presacral schwannomas.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;  15 302-304
  • 26 Yang CC, Chen HC, Chen CM. Endoscopic resection of a presacral schwannoma.  Case report J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;  7 86-89
  • 27 Cassinotti E, Colombo EM, Di Giuseppe M. et al . Current indications for laparoscopy in day-case surgery.  Int J Surg. 2008;  6 ((Suppl 1)) S93-S96
  • 28 Ellison EC, Carey LC. Lessons learned from the evolution of the laparoscopic revolution.  Surg Clin North Am.. 2008;  88 927-941
  • 29 Obenchain TG. laporoscopic lumbar discectomy.  J. Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;  1 145-149
  • 30 Zdeblick TA, David SM. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.  Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;  25 2682-2687
  • 31 Rodriguez HE, Conolly MM, Dracopoulos H. et al . Anterior access to the lumbar spine:laparoscopic versus open.  Am Surg. 2002;  68 982-983
  • 32 Inamasu J, Guiot BH. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review of outcome studies.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2005;  48 340-347
  • 33 Regan JP, Cattey RP, Henry LG. et al . Laparoscopically assisted retroperitoneal spinal surgery.  JSLS.. 2006;  10 493-495
  • 34 Bełdziñski P, Dzierzanowski J, Słoniewski P. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc disease.  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2004;  6 308-313
  • 35 Frantzides CT, Zeni TM, Phillips FM. et al . L5-S1 laparoscopic anterior interbody fusion.  JSLS. 2006;  10 488-492

Correspondence

Dr. T. Oktenoglu

Neurosurgery Department

American Hospital

Guzelbahce sk. No: 20

34365 Nisantasi – Istanbul

Turkey

Phone: +90/212/311 20 00

Fax: +90/212/311 23 75

Email: tuncoktenoglu@gmail.com

    >