Acousticofacial–Glossopharyngeal Triangle: An Anatomic Model for Rapid Surgical Orientation

ABSTRACT

The cerebellopontine angle (CPA) poses a surgical challenge due to the complexity and variation of its associated structures. This study examined the relationship between the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN IX) and the acousticofacial complex (AFC). Retrosigmoid suboccipital dissections were preformed on 10 cadaveric specimens. A triangle formed by the AFC, CN IX, and the skull base was consistently observed. The cisternal portions of the AFC and CN IX formed two sides of the triangle. The base was formed by a line traversing the respective dural portals of these nerves at the skull base. Triangular proportions were utilized to predict distances from five points along the course of CN IX to a corresponding point along the course of the AFC. Predicted distances were not statistically different when compared with cadaveric measurements in all 10 specimens (p > 0.05). A table of predicted distances between CN IX and the AFC at all five points along CN IX was developed, revealing a quantitative model to predict the native location of the AFC in the lateral pontine cistern. The triangle and predicted location of the AFC can serve as points of reference for the identification and preservation of these structures in CPA surgery.

KEYWORDS

Acousticofacial complex - glossopharyngeal nerve - cerebellopontine angle - triangle - posterior cranial fossa - skull base - microsurgical anatomy

REFERENCES

• 1 Nicholas J S, D'Agostino S J, Patel S J. Arterial compression of the retro-olivary sulcus of the ventrolateral medulla in essential hypertension and diabetes.  Hypertension. 2005;  46 982-985
• 2 Jarrahy R, Cha S T, Eby J B, Berci G, Shahinian H K. Fully endoscopic vascular decompression of the glossopharyngeal nerve.  J Craniofac Surg. 2002;  13 90-95
• 3 Rhoton Jr A L. The cerebellopontine angle and posterior fossa cranial nerves by the retrosigmoid approach.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  47(3 Suppl) S93-S129
• 4 Palacios E, Breaux J, Alvernia J E. Hemifacial spasm.  Ear Nose Throat J. 2008;  87 368-370
• 5 Ozveren M F, Türe U. The microsurgical anatomy of the glossopharyngeal nerve with respect to the jugular foramen lesions.  Neurosurg Focus. 2004;  17 E3
• 6 Lang J. Anatomy of the brainstem and the lower cranial nerves, vessels, and surrounding structures.  Am J Otol. 1985;  Suppl 1-19
• 7 Martin R G, Grant J L, Peace D, Theiss C, Rhoton Jr A L. Microsurgical relationships of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery and the facial-vestibulocochlear nerve complex.  Neurosurgery. 1980;  6 483-507
• 8 Lang J, Reiter U. [Intracisternal length of cranial nerves 7-12].  Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1985;  28 153-157
• 9 Watt J, McKillop A. Relation of arteries to roots of nerves in posterior cranial fossa in man.  Arch Surg. 1935;  30 336-345
• 10 Sade B, Lee J H. Significance of the tentorial alignment in approaching the trigeminal nerve and the ventral petrous region through the suboccipital retrosigmoid technique.  J Neurosurg. 2007;  107 932-936
• 11 Silverstein H, Willcox T O, Rosenberg S I, Seidman M D. The jugular dural fold—a helpful skull base landmark to the cranial nerves.  Skull Base Surg. 1995;  5 57-61
• 12 Lang J. Clinical anatomy of the posterior cranial fossa and its foramina. New York; Thieme Medical Publishers 1991
• 13 Silverstein H, Norrell H, Haberkamp T, McDaniel A B. The unrecognized rotation of the vestibular and cochlear nerves from the labyrinth to the brain stem: its implications to surgery of the eighth cranial nerve.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;  95 543-549
• 14 Prescher A, Brors D, von Ammon K. New anatomical description of the cavernous sinus surface and its significance in microsurgery.  Skull Base Surg. 1997;  7 183-191
• 15 Isolan G R, Krayenbühl N, de Oliveira E, Al-Mefty O. Microsurgical anatomy of the cavernous sinus: measurements of the triangles in and around It.  Skull Base. 2007;  17 357-367