Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52(5/06): 275-280
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239586
Technical Note

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Two-Levels Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note

P. Scarone1 , J. F. Lepeintre1 , S. Bennis1 , S. Aldea1 , M. Dupuy1 , S. Gaillard1
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 January 2010 (online)

Abstract

Objective: Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (oTLIF), previously described by Mummaneni et al., is a well-established technique that uses tubular dilators and retractors for treatment of single-level lumbar spinal stenosis.

Technique: We describe eight patients with two-level spinal stenosis who were operated on with minimally invasive spinal arthrodesis via a transforaminal route with the use of tubular retractors. This approach allowed us to obtain double-level cages insertion in all patients, with direct visualization of pedicular entry points and no screw malpositioning.

Conclusion: The oTLIF represents a good compromise in patients with two-level lumbar degenerative disease deserving surgery. Compared to standard open TLIF, it is associated with less postoperative muscular trauma, and faster recovery. This seems to be more evident in that category of patients in whom open approaches need longer incisions and more muscular fiber splitting. Compared to percutaneos TLIF (pTLIF), it allows for bilateral root decompression in every case. Bilateral cage insertion was also possible with this technique.

References

  • 1 Harms JG, Jeszensky D. The unilateral transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.  Orthop Traumatol. 1998;  6 88-99
  • 2 Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP. et al . Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique and complications.  Neurosurg Focus. 2006;  20 1-5
  • 3 Mummaneni PV, Rodts GE. The mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  57 (S4) 256-261
  • 4 Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT. et al . Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 (S2) 166-181
  • 5 Foley KT, Langston TH, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.  Spine. 2003;  28 S26-S35
  • 6 Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P. et al . Minimally invasive microendoscopic-assisted transforaminal interbody fusion with instrumentation.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 98-105
  • 7 Jang JS, Lee SH. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 218-223
  • 8 Fritz JM, Delitto A, Welch WC. et al . Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management and outcome measurements.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;  79 700-708
  • 9 Vitaz TW, Raque GHR, Shields CB. et al . Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients older than 75 years of age.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  91 181-185
  • 10 Deen HG, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK. et al . Analysis of early failures after lumbar decompressive laminectomy for spinal stenosis.  Mayo Clinic Proc. 1995;  70 33-36
  • 11 Epstein NE. Decompression in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: advantages of a conservative approach in 290 patients.  J Spinal Disorders. 1998;  11 116-122
  • 12 Epstein NE. Fusion rates and SF-36 outcomes after multilevel laminectomy and noninstrumented lumbar fusions in a predominantly geriatric population.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;  21 159-164
  • 13 Weiner BK, Fraser R. Spine update: lumbar interbody cages.  Spine. 1998;  5 634-640
  • 14 Fishgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN. et al . Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.  Spine. 1997;  22 2807-2812
  • 15 Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC. et al . Lumbar spinal fusion.  A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the medicare population. Spine. 1993;  18 1463-1470
  • 16 Johnson RG, Murphy M, Miller M. Fusions and transfusions.  An analysis of blood loss and autologous replacement during lumbar fusions. Spine. 1989;  14 358-362
  • 17 Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative Lumbar instability.  Neurosurgery. 2007;  60 ((ONS suppl 2)) 203-213

Correspondence

Dr. Pietro Scarone

Dipartmento di Neurochirurgia Ospedale Policlinico

Via Francesco Sforza 35

20122 MilanItaly

Phone: +393 401 47 10 69

Fax: +390 250 32 04 16

Email: pietroscarone@yahoo.it

    >