Subscribe to RSS
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Effects of a Recovery Swim on Subsequent Running Performance
accepted after revision August 13, 2009
11 November 2009 (online)
The effects of a swimming-based recovery session implemented 10 h post high intensity interval running on subsequent run performance the next day was investigated. Nine well trained triathletes performed two high intensity interval running sessions (HIIS) (8×3 min at 85–90% VO2peak velocity), followed 10 h later by either a swim recovery session (SRS) (20×100 m at 90% of 1 km time trial speed), or a passive recovery session (PRS). Subsequently, a time to fatigue run (TTF) was completed 24 h post-HIIS. Venous blood samples were taken pre-HIIS and pre-TTF to determine the levels of circulating C-Reactive Protein (CRP). Subjects were also asked to rate their perceived recovery prior to commencing the TTF run. The SRS resulted in a significantly longer (830±198 s) TTF as compared to PRS (728±183 s) (p=0.005). There was also a significant percentage change from baseline in the CRP levels 24 h post-HIIS (SRS=−23%, PRS=±5%, p=0.007). There were no significant differences in perceived recovery between two conditions (p=0.40). The findings of the present study showed that a swimming-based recovery session enhanced following day exercise performance, possibly due to the hydrostatic properties of water and its associated influence on inflammation.
post-exercise - hydrostatic pressure - inflammation
- 1 Bishop D, Jenkins D, Mackinnon T. The relationship between plasma lactate parameters, Wpeak and 1 h cycling performance in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30 1270-1275
2 Borg G.
Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 1996
- 3 Brancaccio P, Maffulli N, Limongelli FM. Creatine kinase monitoring in sport medicine. Br Med Bull. 2007; 82 209-230
- 4 Coffey V, Leveritt M, Gill N. Effect of recovery modality on 4-hour repeated treadmill running performance and changes in physiological variables. J Sci Med Sport. 2004; 7 1-10
- 5 Dawson B, Gow S, Modra S, Bishop D, Stewart G. Effects of immediate post-game recovery procedures on muscle soreness, power and flexibility levels over the next 48 h. J Sci Med Sport. 2005; 8 210-221
6 Franklin BA, Whaley MH, Howley ET.
ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000
- 7 Ingram J, Dawson B, Goodman C, Wallman K, Beilby J. Effect of water immersion methods on post-exercise recovery from simulated team sport exercise. J Sci Med Sport. 2008; (Epub ahead of print)
- 8 Jones AM, Doust JH. A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci. 1996; 14 321-327
- 9 Kentta G, Hassmen P. Overtraining and recovery: a conceptual model. Sports Med. 1998; 26 1-16
- 10 Lane KN, Wenger HA. Effect of selected recovery conditions on performance of repeated bouts of intermittent cycling separated by 24 h. J Strength Cond Res. 2004; 18 855-860
11 Reilly T, Cable NT, Dowzer CN. The efficacy of deep-water running.
Contemporary Ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis 2002: 162-166
- 12 Siebers LS, McMurray RG. Effects of swimming and walking on exercise recovery and subsequent swim performance. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 1981; 52 68-75
- 13 Suzuki M, Umeda T, Nakaji S, Shimoyama T, Mashiko T, Sugawara K. Effect of incorporating low intensity exercise into the recovery period after a rugby match. Br J Sports Med. 2004; 38 436-440
- 14 Vaile JM, Gill ND, Blazevich AJ. The effect of contrast water therapy on symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. J Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21 697-702
- 15 Wilcock IM, Cronin JB, Hing WA. Physiological response to water immersion: A method for sports recovery?. Sports Med. 2006; 36 747-765
Dr. P. Peeling
The University of Western Australia, School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health
35 Stirling Hwy
Phone: +61 8 6488 1383
Fax: +61 8 6488 1039