Abstract
The quality of reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the upper extremity, resulting
either from traumatic injury or tumor excision, has relevant implications both from
functional and aesthetic standpoints. Various local and free flaps with more or less
consistent donor-site morbidity have been described in the past. The recent introduction
of the perforator-based flap concept, has led to an evolution in upper extremity reconstruction,
optimizing results at the recipient site whilst minimizing damage to the donor site
and, performing this in the simplest way possible. In this study between 2001 and
2008, 31 patients having post-traumatic or post-tumor excision soft tissue defects
of the upper limb, were treated using local perforator flaps raised according to two
different modalities: “pedicled fasciocutaneous” and “transposition fasciocutaneous/cutaneous”.
Complete and stable coverage of the soft tissue losses was obtained in all cases with
an inconspicuous, only aesthetic, donor-site defect. Superficial or partial necrosis
of the tip of the flap, due to venous congestion, was observed in 2 cases of “pedicled
fasciocutaneous flap”. An additional surgical procedure was required in only one of
these cases. In our series all 9 patients who had a transposition flap, underwent
routinely a preoperative echo color Doppler investigation to identify the main perforators.
In only one case did the Doppler investigation fail to accurately locate the perforator.
Local perforator flaps allow the coverage of medium size defects in the upper extremity,
can be raised with a relatively simple surgical technique, have a high success rate
and good aesthetic results without functional impairment. In the light of this they
can be considered among the surgical choices to resurface complex soft tissue defects
of the upper extremity. Preoperative identification of the perforators in case of
“transposition flaps” greatly facilitates the operation. In our experience echo color
Doppler investigations provided reliable results.
Zusammenfassung
Das Ergebnis der Weichteilrekonstruktion an der oberen Extremität nach Trauma oder
Tumorresektion wird sowohl nach funktionellen als auch ästhetischen Kriterien bewertet.
Unterschiedliche lokale und freie Lappenplastiken mit einem mehr oder minder ähnlichen
Hebedefekt wurden bislang beschrieben. Die Einführung der Perforans-Lappenplastiken
hat durch eine Verbesserung der Ergebnisse im Empfängergebiet sowie eine weitere Verringerung
des Hebedefekts zu einer Weiterentwicklung der Defektdeckung auch an der oberen Extremität
geführt. Zwischen 2001 und 2008 wurden bei 31 Patienten Defekte nach Trauma oder Tumorresektion
mittels lokalen Perforans-Lappenplastiken gedeckt, die in zwei unterschiedlichen Techniken
gehoben wurden: „gestielte fasziokutane” und „Transpositions-fasziokutane bzw. kutane”
Perforans-Lappenplastiken. In allen Fällen konnte eine vollständige Defektdeckung
mit einem unauffälligen Hebedefekt erreicht werden. Oberflächliche oder partielle
Lappenverluste wurden bei „gestielten fasziokutanen” Lappenplastiken in zwei Fällen
beobachtet. In einem Fall war eine sekundäre Operation nötig. Bei allen 9 Patienten
mit einer Transpositions-Perforans-Lappenplastik wurde präoperativ eine Doppler Untersuchung
durchgeführt, die nur in einem Fall keine zuverlässige Lokalisation des Perforans-Gefäßes
ermöglichte. Lokale Perforans-Lappenplastiken ermöglichen die Defektdeckung bei mittelgroßen
Defekten der oberen Extremität. Sie können verhältnismäßig einfach gehoben werden,
haben eine hohe Erfolgsrate und haben ästhetisch günstige Ergebnisse ohne funktionellen
Hebedefekt. Die präoperative Doppler Sonographie erleichtert zuverlässig die intraoperative
Indentifikation und Präparation der Perforans-Gefäße.
Key words
local perforator flap - free style flap - propeller flap - upper extremity - reconstruction
- hand reconstruction
Schlüsselwörter
lokalen Perforans-Lappenplastiken - Free-style Lappernplastiken - propeller Lappernplastiken
- obere Extremität - Rekonstruktion - Handrekonstruktion
References
- 1
Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey SJ. et al .
The Gent consensus on perforator flaps terminology: preliminary definitions.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2003;
112
1378-1382
- 2
Cavades PC, Sanz-Gimenez-Rico JR, Gutierez-de la Camara A. et al .
The medial sural artery perforator free flap.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2001;
108
1609-1615
- 3
Chang SM, Hou CL, Zhang F. et al .
Distally based radial forearm flap with preservation of the radial artery: Anatomic,
experimental and clinical studies.
Microsurgery.
2003;
23
328-337
- 4 Cormack CG, Lamberty BGH.
The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1986
- 5
Deiler S, Pfadenhauer A, Widmann J. et al .
Tensor fasciae latae perforator flap for reconstruction of composite Achilles tendon
defects with skin and vascularised fascia.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2000;
106
342-349
- 6
Fujiwara M, Kawakatsu M, Yoshida Y. et al .
Modified posterior interosseous flap in hand reconstruction.
Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surg.
2003;
7
102-109
- 7
Gedebou TM, Wei FC, Lin CH.
Clinical experience of 1 284 free anterolateral thigh flaps.
Handchir Microchir Plast Chir.
2002;
34
239
- 8
Georgescu AV, Ivan O.
Lambeau radial antebrachial en ilot base sur des perforantes distales. A propos d’un
cas clinique.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet.
2000;
45
58-61
- 9
Georgescu AV, Matei I, Ardelean F. et al .
Microsurgical nonmicrovascular flaps in forearm and hand reconstruction.
Microsurgery.
2007;
27
384-394
- 10
Giunta R, Geisweid A.
Defining perforator flaps: what is really perforated?.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2002;
109
1460-1461
- 11
Giunta R, Geisweid A, Lucas B. et al .
Individual perforator flaps of the upper extremity.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir.
2002;
34
224-229
- 12
Hallock GG.
Further experience with the medial circumflex femoral (GRACILIS) perforator flap.
J Reconstr Microsurg.
2004;
20
115
- 13
Hamdy EK, Zeidan M.
Island adipofascial flap based on distal perforators of the radial artery: An anatomic
and clinical investigation.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1997;
100
1762-1766
- 14
Heitmann C, Khan FN, Levin LS. et al .
Fasciocutaneous radial artery perforator vessels – an anatomic study.
Handchir. Mikrochir. Plast. Chir.
2002;
34
219-223
- 15
Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M.
The propeller flap method.
Br J Plast Surg.
1991;
44
53-54
- 16
Ignatiadis IA, Xeinis SF, Tsiamba VA. et al .
Distal radial and ulnar arteries perforator-based adipofascial flaps for covering
hand traumatic defects.
Microsurgery.
2007;
27
372-378
- 17
Jeng S-F, Wei F-C.
The distally based forearm island flap in hand reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1998;
102
400-440
- 18
Kanellakos GW, Yang D, Morris SF.
Cutaneous vasculature of the forearm.
Ann Plast Surg.
2003;
50
387-392
- 19
Koshima I, Soeda S, Yamasaki M. et al .
The free or pedicled anteromedial thigh flap.
Ann Plast Surg.
1988;
21
480-485
- 20
Koshima I, Soeda S.
Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.
Br J Plast Surg.
1989;
42
645-648
- 21
Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Etoh H. et al .
The radial artery perforator based adipofascial flap for dorsal hand coverage.
Ann Plast Surg.
1995;
35
474-479
- 22
Kroll SS, Rosenfield L.
Perforator-based flaps for low posterior mid-line defects.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1988;
81
561-566
- 23
Lamberty BGH, Cormack GC.
The antecubital fasciocutaneous flap.
Br J Plast Surg.
1983;
36
428
- 24
Matei I, Georgescu A, Chiroiu B. et al .
Harvesting of forearm perforator flaps based on intraoperative vascular exploration:
clinical experiences and literature review.
Microsurgery.
2008;
28
321-330
- 25
Sananpanich K, KunTu Y, Kraisarin J. et al .
Reconstruction of limb soft-tissue defects:using pedicle perforator flaps with preservation
of major vessels: A report of 45 cases.
Injury.
2008;
39
((S4))
S55-S66
- 26
Schwabegger AH, Bodner G, Nincovic M. et al .
Thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap: report of our experience and review of
the literature.
Br J Plast Surg.
2002;
55
390-395
- 27
Taylor GI, Palmer JH.
The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: Experimental study and clinical
applications.
Br J Plast Surg.
1987;
40
113-141
- 28
Taylor GI.
The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps.
Clin Plast Surg.
2003;
30
331-342
- 29
Tiengo C, Macchi V, Portionato A. et al .
Anatomical study of perforator arteries in the distally based radial forearm fasciosubcutaneous
flap.
Clin Anat.
2004;
17
636-642
- 30
Wei FC, Mardini S.
Free style free flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;
114
910-916
- 31
Weinzweig N, Chen L, Chen ZW.
The distally based radial forearm fasciosubcutaneous flap with preservation of the
radial artery: An anatomic and clinical approach.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1994;
94
675-684
- 32
Yildirim S, Taylan G, Aköz T.
Freestyle perforator-based V-Y advancement flap for reconstruction of soft tissue
defects at various anatomical regions.
Ann Plast Surg.
2007;
58
501-506
Korrespondenzadresse
M. InnocentiM.D.
Reconstructive Microsurgery – Oncology
Ospedale CTO
Largo Palagi 1
50141 Firenze
Italy
eMail: m.innocenti@agora.it
