Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2009; 27(2): 115-123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1202300
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Semen Analysis and Sperm Function Assays: What Do They Mean?

Mark Sigman1 , Armand Zini2
  • 1Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
  • 2McGill University, St. Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 February 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Appropriate laboratory testing is an integral component of the proper evaluation of the male presenting with infertility. This article reviews the semen analysis and sperm function assays. Sperm function testing is used to determine if the sperm have the biologic capacity to perform the tasks necessary to reach and fertilize ova and ultimately result in live births. For a sperm to be fertile in vivo, it must be able to traverse the cervical mucus and reach the ova. The sperm must undergo capacitation and the acrosome reaction, fuse with the oolemma, and incorporate into the ooplasm. Proper embryo development requires that functional DNA be delivered to the ooplasm. Defects in any of these steps may result in infertility. A variety of tests are available to evaluate different aspects of these functions. To accurately use these functional assays, the clinician must understand what the tests measure, what the indications are for the assays, and how to interpret the results to direct further testing or patient management.

KEYWORDS

Semen analysis - sperm functions tests - DNA integrity - sperm penetration assay - postcoital test - reactive oxygen species - zona pellucida - acrosome reaction

REFERENCES

  • 1 Guzick D S, Overstreet J W, Factor-Litvak P et al.. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 1388-1393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 World Health Organization .WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Press 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Smith K D, Rodriguez-Rigau L J, Steinberger E. Relation between indices of semen analysis and pregnancy rate in infertile couples.  Fertil Steril. 1977;  28 1314-1319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bostofte E, Bagger P, Michael A, Stakemann G. Fertility prognosis for infertile men: results of follow-up study of semen analysis in infertile men from two different populations evaluated by the Cox regression model.  Fertil Steril. 1990;  54 1100-1106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Santomauro A G, Sciarra J J, Varma A O. A clinical investigation of the role of the semen analysis and postcoital test in the evaluation of male infertility.  Fertil Steril. 1972;  23 245-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Munuce M J, Bregni C, Carizza C, Mendeluk G. Semen culture, leukocytospermia, and the presence of sperm antibodies in seminal hyperviscosity.  Arch Androl. 1999;  42 21-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Grimes D A, Lopez L M. “Oligozoospermia,” “azoospermia,” and other semen-analysis terminology: the need for better science.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  88 1491-1494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fredricsson B, Bjork G. Morphology of postcoital spermatozoa in the cervical secretion and its clinical significance.  Fertil Steril. 1977;  28 841-845
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Menkveld R, Stander F S, Kotze T J, Kruger T F, van Zyl J A. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria.  Hum Reprod. 1990;  5 586-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Coetzee K, Kruge T F, Lombard C J. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review.  Hum Reprod Update. 1998;  4 73-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Keegan B R, Barton S, Sanchez X, Berkeley A S, Krey L C, Grifo J. Isolated teratozoospermia does not affect in vitro fertilization outcome and is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  88 1583-1588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Van Waart J, Kruger T F, Lombard C J, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review.  Hum Reprod Update. 2001;  7 495-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jarow J P, Sanzone J J. Risk factors for male partner antisperm antibodies.  J Urol. 1992;  148 1805-1807
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bachtell N E, Conaghan J, Turek P J. The relative viability of human spermatozoa from the vas deferens, epididymis and testis before and after cryopreservation.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 3048-3051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wilcox A J, Weinberg C R, Baird D D. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby.  N Engl J Med. 1995;  333 1517-1521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jeyendran R S, Van der Ven H H, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo B G, Zaneveld L J. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics.  J Reprod Fertil. 1984;  70 219-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Matson P L, Junk S M, Spittle J W, Yovich J L. Effect of antispermatozoal antibodies in seminal plasma upon spermatozoal function.  Int J Androl. 1988;  11 101-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Optimal evaluation of the infertile female.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  82(Suppl 1) S169-S172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zaneveld L J, De Jonge C J, Anderson R A, Mack S R. Human sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction.  Hum Reprod. 1991;  6 1265-1274
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bedford J M. Significance of the need for sperm capacitation before fertilization in eutherian mammals.  Biol Reprod. 1983;  28 108-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Talbot P, Chacon R S. A triple-stain technique for evaluating normal acrosome reactions of human sperm.  J Exp Zool. 1981;  215 201-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cummins J M, Pember S M, Jequier A M, Yovich J L, Hartmann P E. A test of the human sperm acrosome reaction following ionophore challenge. Relationship to fertility and other seminal parameters.  J Androl. 1991;  12 98-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cross N L, Morales P, Overstreet J W, Hanson F W. Two simple methods for detecting acrosome-reacted human sperm.  Gamete Res. 1986;  15 213-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lee M A, Trucco G S, Bechtol K B et al.. Capacitation and acrosome reactions in human spermatozoa monitored by a chlortetracycline fluorescence assay.  Fertil Steril. 1987;  48 649-658
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Makkar G, Ng E H, Yeung W S, Ho P C. The significance of the ionophore-challenged acrosome reaction in the prediction of successful outcome of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18 534-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Liu D Y, Stewart T, Baker H W. Normal range and variation of the zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction in fertile men.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  80 384-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Oehninger S, Blackmore P, Morshedi M, Sueldo C, Acosta A A, Alexander N J. Defective calcium influx and acrosome reaction (spontaneous and progesterone-induced) in spermatozoa of infertile men with severe teratozoospermia.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  61 349-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Liu D Y, Baker H W. Disordered zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction and failure of in vitro fertilization in patients with unexplained infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  79 74-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Consensus workshop on advanced diagnostic andrology techniques. ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology) Andrology Special Interest Group . Hum Reprod. 1996;  11 1463-1479
    PubMed
  • 30 Quintero I, Ghersevich S, Caille A, Munuce M J, Daniele S M, Morisoli L. Effects of human oviductal in vitro secretion on spermatozoa and search of sperm-oviductal proteins interactions.  Int J Androl. 2005;  28 137-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fenichel P, Donzeau M, Farahifar D, Basteris B, Ayraud N, Hsi B L. Dynamics of human sperm acrosome reaction: relation with in vitro fertilization.  Fertil Steril. 1991;  55 994-999
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Henkel R, Muller C, Miska W, Gips H, Schill W B. Determination of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa is predictive of fertilization in vitro.  Hum Reprod. 1993;  8 2128-2132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Katsuki T, Hara T, Ueda K, Tanaka J, Ohama K. Prediction of outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment using the calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reaction.  Hum Reprod. 2005;  20 469-475
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Liu D Y, Clarke G N, Martic M, Garrett C, Baker H W. Frequency of disordered zona pellucida (ZP)-induced acrosome reaction in infertile men with normal semen analysis and normal spermatozoa-ZP binding.  Hum Reprod. 2001;  16 1185-1190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Liu D Y, Baker H W. A simple method for assessment of the human acrosome reaction of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida: lack of relationship with ionophore A23187-induced acrosome reaction.  Hum Reprod. 1996;  11 551-557
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Burkman L J, Coddington C C, Franken D R, Krugen T F, Rosenwaks Z, Hogen G D. The hemizona assay (HZA): development of a diagnostic test for the binding of human spermatozoa to the human hemizona pellucida to predict fertilization potential.  Fertil Steril. 1988;  49 688-697
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Arslan M, Morshedi M, Arslan E O et al.. Predictive value of the hemizona assay for pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  85 1697-1707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Liu D Y, Baker H W. Defective sperm-zona pellucida interaction: a major cause of failure of fertilization in clinical in-vitro fertilization.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 702-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Liu D Y, Clarke G N, Lopata A, Johnston W I, Baker H W. A sperm-zona pellucida binding test and in vitro fertilization.  Fertil Steril. 1989;  52 281-287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Yanagimachi R, Yanagimachi H, Rogers B J. The use of zona-free animal ova as a test-system for the assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa.  Biol Reprod. 1976;  15 471-476
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Oehninger S, Franken D R, Sayed E, Barroso G, Kolm P. Sperm function assays and their predictive value for fertilization outcome in IVF therapy: a meta-analysis.  Hum Reprod Update. 2000;  6 160-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Alvarez J G, Storey B T. Taurine, hypotaurine, epinephrine and albumin inhibit lipid peroxidation in rabbit spermatozoa and protect against loss of motility.  Biol Reprod. 1983;  29 548-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Chow C K. Vitamin E and oxidative stress.  Free Radic Biol Med. 1991;  11 215-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Niki E. Action of ascorbic acid as a scavenger of active and stable oxygen radicals.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;  54(6, Suppl) 1119S-1124S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Griveau J F, Renard P, Le Lannou D. An in vitro promoting role for hydrogen peroxide in human sperm capacitation.  Int J Androl. 1994;  17 300-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Aitken J, Fisher H. Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: the balance of benefit and risk.  Bioessays. 1994;  16 259-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Aitken R J, Clarkson J S, Fishel S. Generation of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and human sperm function.  Biol Reprod. 1989;  41 183-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Athayde K S, Cocuzza M, Agarwal A et al.. Development of normal reference values for seminal reactive oxygen species and their correlation with leukocytes and semen parameters in a fertile population.  J Androl. 2007;  28 613-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Marchetti C, Obert G, Deffosez A, Formstecher P, Marchetti P. Study of mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species, DNA fragmentation and cell viability by flow cytometry in human sperm.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 1257-1265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Agarwal A, Sharma R K, Nallella K P, Thomas Jr A J, Alvarez J G, Sikka S C. Reactive oxygen species as an independent marker of male factor infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 878-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Aitken R J, Irvine D S, Wu F C. Prospective analysis of sperm-oocyte fusion and reactive oxygen species generation as criteria for the diagnosis of infertility.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  164 542-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Sukcharoen N, Keith J, Irvine D S, Aitken R J. Prediction of the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) potential of human spermatozoa using sperm function tests: the effect of the delay between testing and IVF.  Hum Reprod. 1996;  11 1030-1034
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Zorn B, Vidmar G, Meden-Vrtovec H. Seminal reactive oxygen species as predictors of fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy rates after conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.  Int J Androl. 2003;  26 279-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Saleh R A, Agarwal A, Nada E A et al.. Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  79(Suppl 3) 1597-1605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Hammadeh M E, Radwan M, Al-Hasani S et al.. Comparison of reactive oxygen species concentration in seminal plasma and semen parameters in partners of pregnant and non-pregnant patients after IVF/ICSI.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13 696-706
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ahmadi A, Ng S C. Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa.  J Exp Zool. 1999;  284 696-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Cho C, Jung-Ha H, Willis W D et al.. Protamine 2 deficiency leads to sperm DNA damage and embryo death in mice.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  69 211-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Evenson D P, Jost L K, Marshall D et al.. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 1039-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes M T. Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75 674-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Aravindan G R, Bjordahl J, Jost L K, Evenson D P. Susceptibility of human sperm to in situ DNA denaturation is strongly correlated with DNA strand breaks identified by single-cell electrophoresis.  Exp Cell Res. 1997;  236 231-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Kodama H, Yamaguchi R, Fukuda J, Kasai H, Tanaka T. Increased oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of infertile male patients.  Fertil Steril. 1997;  68 519-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Fernandez J L, Muriel L, Rivero M T, Goyanes V, Vazquez R, Alvarez J G. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation.  J Androl. 2003;  24 59-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Spano M, Bonde J P, Hjollund H I, Kolstad H A, Cordelli E, Leter G. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 43-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Loft S, Kold-Jensen T, Hjollund N H et al.. Oxidative DNA damage in human sperm influences time to pregnancy.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18 1265-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Duran E H, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 3122-3128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A et al.. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22 174-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Muriel L, Meseguer M, Fernandez J L et al.. Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 738-744
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Payne J F, Raburn D J, Couchman G M, Price T M, Jamison M G, Walmer D K. Redefining the relationship between sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay and outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  84 356-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Zini A, Meriano J, Kader K, Jarvi K, Laskin C A, Cadesky K. Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI.  Hum Reprod. 2005;  20 3476-3480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Borini A, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D et al.. Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 2876-2881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, Francois Guerin J. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  87 93-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Lin M H, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Li S H, Lu C H, Sun F J, Hwu Y M. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  90 352-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Frydman N, Prisant N, Hesters L et al.. Adequate ovarian follicular status does not prevent the decrease in pregnancy rates associated with high sperm DNA fragmentation.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  89 92-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Martin R H, Rademaker A W, Greene C et al.. A comparison of the frequency of sperm chromosome abnormalities in men with mild, moderate, and severe oligozoospermia.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  69 535-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Shi Q, Martin R H. Aneuploidy in human spermatozoa: FISH analysis in men with constitutional chromosomal abnormalities, and in infertile men.  Reproduction. 2001;  121 655-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Mark SigmanM.D. 

Associate Professor Surgery (Urology), Brown University

Suite 174, 2 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905

Email: MSigman@Lifespan.org

      >