Zusammenhang zwischen veränderter posterior-anteriorer Steifheit und aktivem Bewegungsumfang der HWS nach manualtherapeutischer Therapie

Tuttle N, Barrett R, Laakso L. Spine 2009; 33: E 673–E679

Literatur

• 1 Caling B, Lee M. Effect of direction of applied mobilization force on the posteroanterior response in the lumbar spine.  J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;  21 534-538
• 2 Cassidy J D, Lopes A A, Yong-Hing K. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine.  J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;  15 570-575
• 3 Chansirinukor W, Lee M, Latimer J. Contribution of pelvic rotation to lumbar posteroanterior movement.  Man Ther. 2001;  6 242-249
• 4 Elvey R L, O’Sullivan P B. A contemporary approach to manual therapy. Boyling JD, Jull GA Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy: The Vertebral Column Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2004 3 rd ed
• 5 Jull G, Treleaven J, Versage G. Manual examination: is pain provocation a major cue for spinal dysfunction?.  Aust J Physiother. 1994;  40 159-165
• 6 Squires M C, Latimer J, Adams R D. et al . Indenter head area and testing frequency effects on posteroanterior lumbar stiffness and subjects rated comfort.  Man Ther. 2001;  6 40-47
• 7 Tseng Y L, Wang W T, Chen W Y. et al . Predictors for the immediate responders to cervical manipulation in patients with neck pain.  Man Ther. 2006;  11 306-315