Zusammenfassung
Viele Kliniker und Forscher wenden den für Befund und Verlaufskontrolle therapeutisch
wichtigen passiven SLR im medizinischen Alltag an. Der Test überprüft die Beweglichkeit
sowie die mechanische Sensitivität der lumbosakralen (neuralen) Strukturen und ihrer
peripheren Fortführungen.
Ziel der Studie war es, den Effekt einer Innenrotation im Hüftgelenk bei der Ausführung
des SLR im Vergleich zum standardmäßig ausgeführten SLR zu untersuchen. Die Ergebnisse
belegten die klinische Erfahrung, dass eine Voreinstellung der Hüftinnenrotation das
Bewegungsausmaß signifikant reduziert.
Abstract
Many clinicians and researchers use the therapeutically important SLR test for assessment
and re-assessment in every day clinical practice. The test assesses both the mobility
and the mechanical sensitivity of lumbo-pelvic (neural) structures and their peripheral
appendices.
The study’s aim was to investigate the effect of an internal hip rotation during passive
SLR in comparison to standardised SLR. The results confirmed the clinical experience
that preset internal hip rotation significantly reduces range of motion.
Schlüsselwörter
SLR - Bewegungsausmaß - Innenrotation
Key words
SLR - range of motion - internal rotation
Literatur
- 1
Boland R A, Adams R D.
Effects of ankle dorsiflexion on range and reliability of straight leg raising.
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.
2000;
46
191-200
- 2
Breig A, Troup J D.
Biomechanical considerations in the straight-leg-raising test. Cadaveric and clinical
studies of the effects of medial hip rotation.
Spine.
1979;
4
242-250
- 3 Butler D. Mobilisation des Nervensystems. Rehabilitation und Prävention. Berlin;
Springer 1998 Bd. 29
- 4
Cameron D M, Bohannon R W, Owen S V.
Influence of hip position on measurements of the straight leg raise test.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
1994;
19
168-172
- 5
Chow R, Adams R, Herbert R.
Straight leg raise test high reliability is not a motor memory artefact.
Australian Physiotherapy.
1994;
40
107-111
- 6
Coppieters M W, Kurz M, Mortensen T. et al .
The impact of neurodynamic testing on the perception of experimentally induced muscle
pain.
Man Ther.
2005;
10
52-60
- 7
Dixon J KJ, Keating J L.
Variability in straight leg raise measurements: review.
Physiotherapy.
2000;
86
361-370
- 8
Ekstrand J, Wiktorsson M, Oberg B. et al .
Lower extremity goniometric measurements: a study to determine their reliability.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1982;
63
171-175
- 9
Gajdosik R L, LeVeau B F, Bohannon R W.
Effects of ankle dorsiflexion on active and passive unilateral straight leg raising.
Phys Ther.
1985;
65
1478-1482
- 10
Hsieh C Y, Walker J M, Gillis K.
Straight-leg-raising test. Comparison of three instruments.
Phys Ther.
1983;
63
1429-1433
- 11
Lee R Y, Munn J.
Passive moment about the hip in straight leg raising.
Clin Biomech.
2000;
15
330-334
- 12
Rabin A, Gerszten P C, Karausky P. et al .
The sensitivity of the seated straight-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg
raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar
nerve root compression.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2007;
88
840-843
- 13 Shacklock M. Clinical Neurodynamics: A New System of Neuromusculoskeletal Treatment. Oxford;
Butterworth-Heinemann 2005
- 14
Shrout P E, Fleiss J L.
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bulletin.
1979;
86
420-427
- 15 Slater H. The effect of foot and ankle position on the response to the SLR test
in young asymptomatic subjects (Thesis). Adelaide; University of South Australia 1988
1 Abschlussarbeit zur Erlangung der OMT-Prüfung 2007 (OMT-Ausbildung 2005 – 2007).
Mathias Bühler
Primstr. 11 / 1
78549 Spaichingen
eMail: mathias@koerper-konzept.de
