What Is the Best Tumor Size to Achieve Optimal Functional Results in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery?

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To analyze our own functional results to delineate a critical vestibular schwannoma size for middle cranial fossa (MCF) surgery with the best possible outcome. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center. Methods: Tumors were divided into intracanalicular, tumors 1 to 5, 6 to 10, and 11 to 15 mm in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Patients were evaluated at 2 months, 1 year, and 5 years after surgery. Results: At 1 year, House-Brackmann score of I or II was obtained in 100% of intracanalicular and in 96%, 86%, and 85% with tumors up to 5, 10, and 15 mm in the CPA, respectively. Class I hearing was postoperatively preserved in 61%, 41%, 29%, and 20%, and measurable word recognition in 67%, 51%, 35%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The outcome is predominantly a function of tumor size, and these changes influence MCF surgery at an earlier stage than in the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach. For the facial nerve, there is a cutoff at 5-mm extracanalicular extension. Also, chances for successful hearing preservation decrease rapidly with size, and in tumors beyond 1.5 cm are below 20%. Consequently, although an expectant policy with small tumors may be reasonable in some instances, it is not so for MCF candidates.

KEYWORDS

Vestibular schwannoma - hearing preservation - tumor size - facial nerve - middle cranial fossa - long-term results

REFERENCES

• 1 Stangerup S E, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos M, Thomsen J. The natural history of vestibular schwannoma.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27 547-552
• 2 Tos M, Charabi S, Thomsen J. Clinical experience with vestibular schwannomas: epidemiology, symptomatology, diagnosis, and surgical results.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;  255 1-6
• 3 Sterkers J M, Morrison G A, Sterkers O, El-Dine M M. Preservation of facial, cochlear, and other nerve functions in acoustic neuroma treatment.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;  110 146-155
• 4 Magnan J, Barbieri M, Mora R et al.. Retrosigmoid approach for small and medium-sized acoustic neuromas.  Otol Neurotol. 2002;  23 141-145
• 5 Slattery W H, Brackmann D E, Hitselberger W. Middle fossa approach for hearing preservation with acoustic neuromas.  Am J Otol. 1997;  18 596-601
• 6 Weber P C, Gantz B J. Results and complications from acoustic neuroma excision via middle cranial fossa approach.  Am J Otol. 1996;  17 669-675
• 7 Gjuric M, Wigand M E, Wolf S R. Enlarged middle fossa vestibular schwannoma surgery: experience with 735 cases.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;  22 223-230
• 8 Gjuric M. Enlarged middle fossa surgery: indications, advantages, and surgical technique.  Mediterr J Otol. 2005;  1 128-135
• 9 House J W, Brackmann D E. Facial nerve grading system.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;  93 146-147
• 10 Meyer T A, Canty P A, Wilkinson E P, Hansen M R, Rubinstein J T, Gantz B J. Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27 380-392
• 11 Monsell E M, Balkany T A, Gates G A, Goldenberg R A, Meyerlesff W L, House J W. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma).  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;  113 179-180
• 12 Friedman R A, Kesser B, Brackmann D E, Fisher L M, Slattery W H, Hitselberger W E. Long-term hearing preservation after middle fossa removal of vestibular schwannoma.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129 660-665
• 13 Arriaga M A, Chen D A. Facial function in hearing preservation acoustic neuroma surgery.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;  127 543-546
• 14 Isaacson B, Telian S A, El-Kashlan H K. Facial nerve outcomes in middle cranial fossa vs translabyrinthine approaches.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;  133 906-910
• 15 Wiet R J, Mamikoglu B, Odom L, Hoistad D L. Long-term results of the first 500 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;  124 645-651
• 16 Colletti V, Fiorino F. Is the middle fossa approach the treatment of choice for intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma?.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;  132 459-466
• 17 Wiegand D A, Ojemann R G, Fickel V. Surgical treatment of acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) in the United States: report from the Acoustic Neuroma Registry.  Laryngoscope. 1996;  106(1 Pt 1) 58-66
• 18 Driscoll C L, Jackler R K, Pitts L H, Banthia V. Is the entire fundus of the internal auditory canal visible during the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuroma?.  Am J Otol. 2000;  21 382-388
• 19 Kumon Y, Sasaki S, Kohno K et al.. Selection of surgical approaches for small acoustic neuromas.  Surg Neurol. 2000;  53 52-60
• 20 Mangham Jr C A. Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa surgery for small vestibular schwannomas.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114 1455-1461
• 21 Arts H A, Telian S A, El-Kashlan H, Thompson B G. Hearing preservation and facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma surgery: results using the middle cranial fossa approach.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27 234-241
• 22 Chee G H, Nedzelski J M, Rowed D. Acoustic neuroma surgery: the results of long-term hearing preservation.  Otol Neurotol. 2003;  24 672-676
• 23 Brackmann D E, House J R, Hitselberger W E. Technical modifications to the middle fossa craniotomy approach in removal of acoustic neuromas.  Am J Otol. 1994;  15 614-619
• 24 Gjuric M, Zizic Mitrecic M, Greess H, Berg M. Vestibular schwannoma volume as a predictor of hearing outcome after surgery.  Otol Neurotol. 2007;  28 822-827
• 25 Thornton A R, Raffin M J. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.  J Speech Hear Res. 1978;  21 507-518
• 26 Tucci D L, Telian S A, Kileny P R, Hoff J T, Kemink J L. Stability of hearing preservation following acoustic neuroma surgery.  Am J Otol. 1994;  15 183-188
• 27 McKenna M J, Halpin C, Ojemann R G et al.. Long-term hearing results in patients after surgical removal of acoustic tumors with hearing preservation.  Am J Otol. 1992;  13 134-136
• 28 Umezu H, Aiba T, Tsuchida S, Seki Y. Early and late postoperative hearing preservation in patients with acoustic neuromas.  Neurosurgery. 1996;  39 267-271 discussion 271-272
• 29 Shelton C, Hitselberger W E, House W F, Brackmann D E. Hearing preservation after acoustic tumor removal: long-term results.  Laryngoscope. 1990;  100(2 Pt 1) 115-119