Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52(1): 53-55
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1085458
Technical Note

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Placement of an Electrode Array as a Dural Substitute for Dorsal Column Stimulation: Technical Note

T. Menovsky 1 , D. De Ridder 1 , G. De Mulder 2
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Middelares Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. Februar 2009 (online)

Abstract

One the drawbacks of the dorsal column stimulation (DCS) method is that the electrode array and the subsequent electrical stimulation induce proliferation of connective tissue between the array and the dura. In this case report, a patient is presented in whom dural thickening after placement of a DCS electrode array at the C2-C3 level prevented sufficient electrical penetration and thus resulted in treatment failure. The thickened dura was excised and the electronic array was used as a dural substitute. This resulted in efficient DCS and resolution of the pain symptoms.

References

  • 1 Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK. et al . Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain – some predictors of success. A 15-year experience.  Surg Neurol. 1998;  50 110-121
  • 2 Loge D, Devulder JE, Coster O De. et al . The epidural fibrous sheath: a guide for the replacement of a spinal cord stimulation electrode.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;  28 73-74
  • 3 Reynolds AF, Shetter AG. Scarring around cervical epidural stimulating electrode.  Neurosurgery. 1983;  13 63-65
  • 4 Richardson RR, Nunez C, Siqueira EB. Histological reaction to percutaneous epidural neurostimulation: initial and long-term results.  Med Pro Technol. 1979;  6 179-184
  • 5 Kloth LC. Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials.  Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005;  41 23-44
  • 6 Peters E, Armstrong D, Wunderlich R. et al . The benefit of electrical stimulation to enhance perfusion in persons with diabetes mellitus.  J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998;  37 396-400
  • 7 Bourguignon G, Bourguignon L. Electric stimulation of protein and DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts.  FASEB J. 1987;  1 398-402
  • 8 Cheng K, Goldman R. Electric fields and proliferation in a dermal wound model: cell cycle kinetics.  Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;  19 68-74
  • 9 Konikoff JJ. Electrical promotion of soft tissue repairs.  Biomed Eng. 1976;  4 1-5
  • 10 Taskan I, Ozyazgan I, Tercan M. et al . A comparative study of the effect of ultrasound and electrostimulation on wound healing in rats.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 966-972
  • 11 Maynard EM, Fernandez E, Normann RA. A technique to prevent dural adhesions to chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.  J Neurosci Meth. 2000;  97 93-101
  • 12 Robertson SC, Menezes AH. Hemorrhagic complications in association with silastic dural substitute: pediatric and adult case report with a review of the literature.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 201-206
  • 13 Boop FA, Chadduck WM. Silastic duraplasty in pediatric patients.  Neurosurgery. 1991;  29 785-787

Correspondence

T. MenovskyMD, PhD 

Department of Neurosurgery

University Hospital of Antwerp

Wilrijkstraat 10

2650 Edegem

Belgium

Telefon: +32/3/821 33 28

Fax: +32/3/825 24 28

eMail: tomas.menovsky@uza.be

    >