Planta Med 2008; 74 - PA321
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1084319

Antidiabetic principle from Eclipta prostrata

AM Rashid 1, SM Rahman 1
  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

The plant Eclipta prostrata, a member of the Asteraceae family, has traditional reputation of being used as a medicinal agent in Bangladesh [1]. The methanol extract of the whole plant of Eclipta prostrata and one of its isolated compounds, eclalbasaponin II (1) were administered to alloxan-induced diabetic rats for 28 and 7 consecutive days, respectively. During the study, a potent antidiabetic activity was observed. Blood sugar was significantly reduced (Table 1 and 2) by E. prostrata extract and eclalbasaponin II (1), respectively as compared to untreated diabetic rats [2,3]. Analyses of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [4] showed no significant hepatotoxicity by E. prostrata extractive in alloxan-induced diabetic rats when compared to the diabetic control rats.

Table 1: The effect of 4 weeks treatment of methanolic extract of E. prostrata on blood sugar level

Groups

Mmol/L

1st day

7th day

14th day

21st day

28th day

Normal (untreated)

4.85±0.08

5.02±0.10

4.91±0.07

4.79±0.11

4.85±0.06

Diabetic control

12.03±0.18**

12.98±0.19**

14.05±0.23**

15.09±0.28**

17.20±0.22**

Glibenclamide treated

12.18±0.55

10.82±0.18

9.53±0.21

7.08±0.16

6.43±0.16

Methanolic extract treated

12.69±0.32

10.85±0.16*

9.37±0.20**

7.21±0.24**

6.55±0.11**

Table 2: The effect of 1 week treatment of eclalbasaponin II (1) on blood sugar level

Groups

Mmol/L

1st day

3rd day

5th day

7th day

Normal untreated

4.8±0.56

5.03±0.48

4.85±0.55

4.95±0.40

Diabetic control

12.40±0.35**

12.49±0.44**

12.97±0.51**

13.52±0.34**

Glibenclamide treated

12.78±0.25

12.01±0.31

11.63±0.26

10.51±0.35

Eclalbasaponin treated

12.87±0.68

10.80±0.71**

8.17±0.65**

6.06±0.66**

Values are given as mean±SEM for 6 rats in each group. Diabetic control (Group-2) was compared with normal (Group-1) on corresponding day. Experimental group (Group-4) was compared with diabetic control group on corresponding day. *P<0.05; **P<0.001

Acknowledgement: We are grateful to University of Dhaka, Bangladesh for partial financial support for carrying out the research.

References: 1. Abdel-Kader, M.S. et al. (1998)J. Nat. Prod. 61:1202–1208. 2. Yoshikawa, M. et al. (2001) Chem. Pharm. Bull. 49:863–870. 3. Trinder, P. (1969) Ann. Clin. Biochem. 6:24–27. 4. Mansour, H.A. et al. (2002) Toxicology 170:221–228.