RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2813-3195
Real-world practices and barriers in endoscopic submucosal dissection training: International comprehensive survey
Autor*innen
Abstract
Background and study aims
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables curative resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia but requires structured training. Although European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) curricula exist, real-world practices and barriers remain unclear.
Methods
We conducted an anonymous web-based survey (April–July 2025) with 55 items assessing training opportunities, barriers, curriculum adherence, and quality metrics, stratified by role and annual ESD volume.
Results
We received 288 responses (137 trainees, 151 trainers) from 39 countries across five geographic macro-areas. Nearly half (47.2%) had undertaken structured training, but only 46.5% fulfilled ESGE/ASGE curricula, with marked variation by center volume (69.6% in high-volume vs 26.8% in low-volume, P < 0.001). Lack of access to training models was reported by 46.5% overall, more frequently in low-volume centers. In vivo human training, animal models, and intensive courses were rated highest, whereas lack of simulators, fellowship costs, and limited time were leading barriers. Quality monitoring was reported in 62.5% of centers, prioritizing R0 and en bloc resection rates over procedure speed. Trainees valued traction and underwater techniques more than trainers. Regional differences were pronounced: North-West Europe and Asia-Pacific concentrated high-volume centers and greater curriculum adherence, whereas Africa/Middle East and South-East Europe faced resource and financial constraints.
Conclusions
This international survey reveals substantial disparities in ESD training and calls for coordinated efforts to improve access to structured curricula, mentorship, and affordable training models.
Keywords
Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Polyps / adenomas / ... - Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc, ...) - Quality and logistical aspects - TrainingPublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 10. Oktober 2025
Angenommen nach Revision: 12. Februar 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
16. Februar 2026
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. März 2026
© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Giulio Calabrese, Marcello Maida, Shaimaa Elkholy, Manol Jovani, David J Tate, Hugo Uchima, Yohei Minato, Partha Pal, Sunil Gupta, Rui Morais, Torsten Beyna, Jeremie Jacques, Sandro Sferrazza. Real-world practices and barriers in endoscopic submucosal dissection training: International comprehensive survey. Endosc Int Open 2026; 14: a28133195.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2813-3195
-
References
- 1 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 591-622
- 2 Yamamoto Y, Fujisaki J, Ishiyama A. et al. Current status of training for endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm at cancer institute hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, a famous Japanese hospital. Digest Endosc 2012; 24: 148-153
- 3 Pimentel-Nunes P, Pioche M, Albéniz E. et al. Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 980-992
- 4 Aihara H, Dacha A, Anand GS. et al. Core curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1215-1221
- 5 Schlachterman A, Yang D, Goddard A. et al. Perspectives on endoscopic submucosal dissection training in the United States: A survey analysis. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E399-E409
- 6 Alfarone L, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Impact of annual case volume on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes in a large prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2025; 120: 370-378
- 7
United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Statistics. UNSD Publications Catalogue. https://unstats.un.org/UNSDWebsite/Publications/PublicationsCatalogue/109
- 8 Hamesch K, Cahyadi O, Dimitriadis S. et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training conditions, results from a pan-European survey: Between vision and reality. United European Gastroenterol J 2025; 13: 474-487
- 9 Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H. et al. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Digest Endosc 2012; 24: 129-132
- 10 Yzet C, Jacques J, Lafeuille P. et al. Does development of submucosal dissection models influence quality of training? Comparison of existing models. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26215244
- 11 Hadjinicolaou AV, Pappas A, Sujendran V. et al. Untutored training pathway to achieve competence in esophagogastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western center. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: 439-443.e6
- 12 Thomson S, Hair C, Oyeleke GK. Outside the training paradigm: challenges and solutions for endoscopy provision in resource-limited settings. Techniq Innovat Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 26: 270-282
- 13 Mitsui T, Sunakawa H, Yoda Y. et al. Novel gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model enhances the endoscopic submucosal dissection skills of trainees: A multicenter comparative study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 3088-3095
- 14 Ono K, Ohata K, Ide D. et al. Potential for remote hands-on training system for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. VideoGIE 2025; 10: 428-433
- 15 Sferrazza S, Calabrese G, Maselli R. et al. Underwater techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy: diving into the depths. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16: 3535
- 16 Van Der Voort V, Legros R, Albouys J. et al. Multi-strategy endoscopic submucosal dissection of a challenging lesion. Endoscopy 2025; 57: E114-E115
- 17 Maida M, Facciorusso A, Marasco G. et al. Comparative efficacy of different techniques for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Digest Liver Dis 2025; 57: 527-534
- 18 Fuccio L, Bhandari P, Maselli R. et al. Ten quality indicators for endoscopic submucosal dissection: what should be monitored and reported to improve quality. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6: 262
- 19 Kotha S, Long M, Berry P. Gender disparity in hepatobiliary endoscopy training and delivery: Results of a nationwide survey. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25056019
- 20 Yu JX, Enestvedt B, Anderson MA. et al. Gender disparities in advanced endoscopy fellowship. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E338-E342
