Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2794-0652
The DIEP Flap Revisit: A Cornerstone of Modern Autologous Breast Reconstruction Anatomy, Preoperative Planning, Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
Authors
Abstract
Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has become a standard of care in autologous breast reconstruction, offering reliable aesthetic outcomes and minimized donor site morbidity. Despite its advantages, substantial variability in perforator anatomy and intramuscular course presents technical challenges, and detailed knowledge, meticulous preoperative planning, and precise microsurgical techniques are the key to success. Advances in preoperative imaging, particularly computed tomography angiography (CTA), have enhanced perforator selection and flap design, improving operative efficiency and safety. DIEP flap reconstruction is applicable across a wide range of clinical scenarios, including immediate and delayed reconstruction, patients requiring or receiving irradiation, and those with low body mass index (BMI) or prior abdominal surgeries. Emerging innovations, including robotic-assisted flap harvest, image-guided navigation, and sensory neurotization, aim to further reduce donor site morbidity and improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. This review summarizes the anatomical foundations, surgical strategies, perioperative care, postoperative outcomes, and evolving techniques in effective DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Publication History
Article published online:
02 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Sørensen JA. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: A meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (11) 1474-1480
- 2 Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: A meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 752-764
- 3 Kostov S, Dineva S, Kornovski Y, Slavchev S, Ivanova Y, Yordanov A. Vascular anatomy and variations of the anterior abdominal wall - significance in abdominal surgery. Prague Med Rep 2023; 124 (02) 108-142
- 4 Leung R, Chae MP, Tobin V, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. In-vivo quantitative mapping of the perforasomes of deep inferior epigastric artery perforators. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (10) e1960
- 5 Frank K, Ströbel A, Ludolph I. et al. Improving the safety of DIEP flap transplantation: Detailed perforator anatomy study using preoperative CTA. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (05) 701
- 6 Rozen WM, Bhullar HK, Hunter-Smith D. How to assess a CTA of the abdomen to plan an autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2019; 8 (Suppl. 04) S291-S296
- 7 Hamdi M, Rebecca A. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEAP) in breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2006; 20 (02) 95-102
- 8 Gagnon AR, Blondeell PN. Deep and superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. Cir Plást Ibero-Latinoam 2006; 32 (04) 1-7
- 9 Park SO, Imanishi N, Chang H. The anatomic features and role of superficial inferior epigastric vein in abdominal flap. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (04) 482-487
- 10 Shepherd HM, Sharp OL, Yousif YF, Power KT, Nanidis TG. Consistent position of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap raise: A radiological analysis. JPRAS Open 2025; 46: 696-699
- 11 Prantl L, Moellhoff N, Fritschen UV. et al. Impact of smoking status in free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: A multicenter study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (09) 694-702
- 12 Zinner G, Martineau J, Tremp M, Oranges CM. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on postoperative complication of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A retrospective comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2025; 13 (11) e7257
- 13 Teunis T, Heerma van Voss MR, Kon M, van Maurik JF. CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (06) 496-502
- 14 Keys KA, Louie O, Said HK, Neligan PC, Mathes DW. Clinical utility of CT angiography in DIEP breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (03) e61-e65
- 15 Chang CC, Huang JJ, Wu CW. et al. A strategic approach for DIEP flap breast reconstruction in patients with a vertical midline abdominal scar. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (Suppl. 01) S6-S11
- 16 Holm C, Mayr M, Höfter E, Ninkovic M. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: A clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (01) 37-43
- 17 Park JW, Kang JM, Yoo K, Woo KJ. Perfusion area versus volume of the DIEP flap: A multivariable analysis of perforator and flap characteristics for estimation of perfusion area and volume. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 96: 215-222
- 18 Lee KT, Mun GH. Benefits of superdrainage using SIEV in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (01) 75-83
- 19 Kuo WL, Wong AW, Tsai CY. et al. Oncoplastic entirely robot-assisted approach: Incorporating robotic surgery in both mastectomy and DIEP flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025; 156 (04) 451e-460e
- 20 Tsai CY, Kim BS, Kuo WL. et al. Novel port placement in robot-assisted DIEP flap harvest improves visibility and bilateral DIEP access: Early controlled cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (04) 590e-595e
- 21 Lin TE, Wong AW, Cheong DC, Kuo WL, Tsai HP, Huang JJ. Strategically shifting paradigms: The new era of DIEP flaps with minimally invasive mastectomy: A retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24 (01) 1072
- 22 Zhang Q, Xiao Q, Guo R. et al. Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: A 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases. Gland Surg 2019; 8 (05) 477-485
- 23 Chen CF, Cheong DC, Kuo WL. et al. Clinical scenarios using thoracodorsal and lateral thoracic vessels versus internal mammary vessels in bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; (e-pub ahead of print)
- 24 Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: An easy three-step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (02) 455-462
- 25 Wong AW, Kuo WL, Cheong DC. et al. Six steps for a successful aesthetic free flap reconstruction after minimally invasive mastectomy: A retrospective case-control study. Int J Surg 2024; 110 (02) 645-653
- 26 Van Vliet A, Girardot A, Bouchez J, Kumar A, Dayicioglu D. Abdominal plication for better cosmetic outcomes during deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (6S Suppl 5) S575-S577
- 27 Stern CS, Plotsker EL, Nelson JA. et al. Optimizing unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A quality improvement study. J Healthc Qual 2022; 44 (06) 354
- 28 Carruthers KH, Tiwari P, Yoshida S, Kocak E. Inpatient flap monitoring after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: How long is long enough?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 682-687
- 29 Voineskos SH, Frank SG, Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: Predictors of complications and outcomes. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (06) 484-496
- 30 Niddam S, Philandrianos C, Abellan-Lopez M, Bertrand B, Casanova D. Satisfaction and quality of life after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2023; 68 (01) 41-46
- 31 Mayer HF, Coloccini A, Viñas JF. Three-dimensional printing in breast reconstruction: Current and promising applications. J Clin Med 2024; 13 (11) 3278
- 32 Edgcumbe PM, Jiang T, Ho JF, Martin ML, Stein MJ, Isaac KV. Intraoperative surgical guidance for DIEP flap harvest using augmented reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025; 155 (06) 932-935
- 33 O'Neill RC, Spiegel AJ. Modern approaches to breast neurotization. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50 (02) 347-355
- 34 Shyu S, Chang TN, Lu JC. et al. Breast neurotization along with breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy enhances quality of life and reduces denervation symptoms in patient-reported outcome: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (05) 3235-3247
- 35 Chang TN, Lu JC, Sung CW. et al. Elongation of intercostal nerve cutaneous branches for breast and nipple neurotization during breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: Case-control study. Br J Surg 2024; 111 (02) znae005
- 36 Yang JR, Kuo WL, Yu CC, Chen SC, Huang JJ. Reconstructive outcome analysis of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on immediate breast reconstruction: A retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21 (01) 522
- 37 Hsieh WC, Tee R, Huang YT, Kuo WL, Huang JJ. Surgical and patient-reported outcomes in an Asian female population with or without adjuvant radiotherapy after immediate free perforator flap breast reconstruction: A retrospective review. JPRAS Open 2023; 38: 237-248
- 38 Chan SY, Kuo WL, Cheong DC, Chang FC, Huang JJ. Small flaps in microsurgical breast reconstruction: Selection between the profunda artery perforator and small deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps and associated outcomes and complications. Microsurgery 2024; 44 (01) e31046
- 39 Tinhofer IE, Tsai TY, Cheong DC, Lin TE, Kuo WL, Huang JJ. Coherences of cesarean sectioning scars and other abdominal scars and venous augmentation using SIEV in free DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2025; 45 (02) e70039
- 40 Cheong DC, Wong AW, Kao SW, Chang SY, Huang JJ. DIEP donor site satisfaction between patients with and without history of pregnancy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (07) 504-510
- 41 Lee YH, Huang JJ, Lu JC, Cheong DC, Chen CF, Chang TN. Complications and donor site morbidity in harvesting the intercostal main nerve as a graft for breast neurotization in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; (e-pub ahead of print)
- 42 Gau RY, Chou HH, Tsai HP. et al. Long-term follow-up of surgical outcomes and oncological results of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction through a single axillary incision with different approach methods. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32 (03) 2092-2102
- 43 Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Chu CH. et al. Comparative analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional mastectomy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2025; 51 (05) 109622
- 44 Kim BS, Kuo WL, Cheong DC, Lindenblatt N, Huang JJ. Transcutaneous medial fixation sutures for free flap inset after robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 29-33
- 45 Huang JJ, Chuang EY, Cheong DC, Kim BS, Chang FC, Kuo WL. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Feasibility and aesthetic results - Case series. Int J Surg 2021; 95: 106143
