Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2780-7093
Measurement Properties of Instruments Assessing Digital Competence in Nursing: A Systematic Review
Authors
Funding Information This research is part of the European project NURIC, funded by the European Union under the ERASMUS-EDU-2023-CB-VET programme (grant reference: 101128719). The funding organization had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis, or data interpretation, nor did it contribute to the manuscript's writing or the decision to publish the findings.
Abstract
Background
The digital transformation of healthcare is reshaping care delivery among healthcare professionals, requiring nurses to develop digital competencies. These competencies are essential but often underdeveloped due to limited training and resources. Global initiatives emphasize integrating these competencies into nursing education, necessitating valid instruments to assess them.
Objective
This systematic review aims to identify instruments measuring digital competence in nursing and to assess their measurement properties.
Methods
This review was registered in PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42024522349) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was performed in CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus on instruments assessing digital competencies in nursing and reporting measurement properties. Measurement properties and their methodological quality were assessed using the COSMIN criteria, and the overall quality of the evidence was graded using a modified GRADE approach.
Results
A total of 27 instruments were identified, relating to three interconnected constructs: nursing informatics, digital health, and information and communication technology. Based on their measurement properties, the instruments were categorized into three groups (A, B, C) following the COSMIN methodology to support recommendations for use. Six instruments were classified under category A (recommended for use): the DigiHealthCom and DigiComInf instruments, the Turkish version of TANIC, the short version of ITASH, the Digital Competence Questionnaire, and the 30-item Arabic version of SANICS. Twenty instruments were categorized under category B (potentially recommendable, but further validation is needed). One instrument was placed in category C (not recommended for use).
Conclusion
As digital competence becomes an increasing priority in education and public health, valid and reliable instruments are essential for assessing and monitoring these competencies. Such instruments support the identification of training needs, the evaluation of educational outcomes, and the integration of digital skills into nursing curricula and clinical practice, ultimately strengthening the digital readiness of the nursing workforce.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
No human subjects have been involved in the study.
Publication History
Received: 29 July 2025
Accepted: 02 January 2026
Article published online:
22 January 2026
© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Dehghan NN, Mohammadi FM, Seylani K. Nurses' experiences of the hospital information systems. J Hayat. 2015; 20 (04) 5-18
- 2 Nazeha N, Pavagadhi D, Kyaw BM, Car J, Jimenez G, Tudor Car L. A digitally competent health workforce: scoping review of educational frameworks. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (11) e22706
- 3 Jensen R, Guedes EdeS, Leite MM. [Informatics competencies essential to decision making in nursing management]. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2016; 50 (01) 112-120
- 4 Mainz A, Nitsche J, Weirauch V, Meister S. Measuring the digital competence of health professionals: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ 2024; 10: e55737
- 5 Bowles KH, Dykes P, Demiris G. The use of health information technology to improve care and outcomes for older adults. Res Gerontol Nurs 2015; 8 (01) 5-10
- 6 Crampton NH, Reis S, Shachak A. Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (03) 654-665
- 7 McGonigle D, Mastrian K. Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge. 3rd ed.. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2015
- 8 International Medical Informatics Association. The nursing informatics special interest group-defnition. 2009 . Accessed January 7, 2025 at: https://www.amia.org/programs/working-groups/nursing-informatics
- 9 Fung KYM. Utilizing TIGER competencies to improve informatics practice. (Doctor of nursing practice (DNP) projects; Vol. 76). The University of San Francisco; 2016. . Accessed January 7, 2025 at: https://repository.usfca.edu/dnp/76
- 10 Graves JR, Corcoran S. The study of nursing informatics. Image J Nurs Sch 1989; 21 (04) 227-231
- 11 Ball MJ. Nursing Informatics: Where Caring and Technology Meet. 1991
- 12 Hannah KJ, Ball MJ, Edwards MJ. Eds. Introduction to Nursing Informatics. Springer; 1994
- 13 Saba VK. A look at nursing informatics. Int J Med Inform 1997; 44 (01) 57-60
- 14 Staggers N, Gassert CA, Curran C. Informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. J Nurs Educ 2001; 40 (07) 303-316
- 15 Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) Initiative. Informatics competencies for every practicing nurse: recommendations from the TIGER Collaborative. Chicago (IL): TIGER Initiative; 2009. . Accessed January 7, 2025 at: http://www.tigersummit.com
- 16 Hunter K, McGonigle D, Hebda T. TIGER-based measurement of nursing informatics competencies: the development and implementation of an online tool for self-assessment. J Nurs Educ Pract 2013; 3 (12) 70-80
- 17 Hunter KM, Dee M, Hebda T. Operationalizing TIGER NI competencies for online assessment of perceived competency. NI 2012 (2012) 2012; 2012: 181
- 18 Kleib M, Chauvette A, Furlong K, Nagle L, Slater L, McCloskey R. Approaches for defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19 (04) 794-841
- 19 Cowan DT, Norman I, Coopamah VP. Competence in nursing practice: a controversial concept–a focused review of literature. Nurse Educ Today 2005; 25 (05) 355-362
- 20 Vinot D, Zaher A. Competencies of health workforce in the age of artificial intelligence: a conceptual framework. GRH Paris; 2021. . Lyon School of Management. Accessed January 7, 2025 at: https://agrh2021.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/
- 21 Janssen J, Stoyanov S, Ferrari A, Punie Y, Pannekeet K, Sloep P. Experts' views on digital competence: commonalities and differences. Comput Educ 2013; 68: 473-481
- 22 World Health Organization (WHO). Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2020
- 23 European Commission. Digital Skills and Jobs Platform: Building digital capacity across Europe. Brussels: European Commission; 2023
- 24 Brown J, Pope N, Bosco AM, Mason J, Morgan A. Issues affecting nurses' capability to use digital technology at work: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29 (15–16): 2801-2819
- 25 Wahoush O, Banfield L. Information literacy during entry to practice: information-seeking behaviors in student nurses and recent nurse graduates. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 34 (02) 208-213
- 26 le Roux L, Bimerew M, Chipps J. A survey of nurse informatics competencies of professional nurses in clinical practice public hospitals in South Africa. Stud Health Technol Inform 2024; 315: 575-576
- 27 American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education. Washington (DC): American Association of Colleges of Nursing; 2021. [cited October 28, 2025]. Accessed January 7, 2025 at: https://www.aacnnursing.org/portals/42/academicnursing/pdf/essentials-2021.pdf
- 28 Chu CH, Siganevich Y, Donato-Woodger S. et al. Teaching informatics competencies within nursing education: a scoping review of teaching strategies. Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16 (04) 911-929
- 29 Reading Turchioe M, Kisselev S, Van Bulck L, Bakken S. Increasing generative artificial intelligence competency among students enrolled in doctoral nursing research coursework. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (05) 842-851
- 30 Raghunathan K, McKenna L, Peddle M. Informatics competency measurement instruments for nursing students: a rapid review. Comput Inform Nurs 2022; 40 (07) 466-477
- 31 Li Y, Ji W, Chen H, Xie X, Yang J, Gao J. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the informatics competence of nurses: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract 2024; 79: 104070
- 32 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
- 33 Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd edition.. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000
- 34 Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5 (01) 210
- 35 Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM. et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018; 27 (05) 1147-1157
- 36 Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC. et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018; 27 (05) 1171-1179
- 37 Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A. et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2018; 27 (05) 1159-1170
- 38 Yoon S, Yen PY, Bakken S. Psychometric properties of the self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies scale. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 146: 546-550
- 39 Choi J, Bakken S. Validation of the self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies scale among undergraduate and graduate nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2013; 52 (05) 275-282
- 40 Godsey JA. Towards an informatics competent nursing profession: validation of the self-assessment of nursing informatics competency scale (sanics) before and after online informatics training [doctoral thesis]. Manoa: University of Hawaii; 2015
- 41 Reixach E, Andrés E, Sallent Ribes J. et al. Measuring the digital skills of catalan health care professionals as a key step toward a strategic training plan: digital competence test validation study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 (11) e38347
- 42 Chung SY, Staggers N. Measuring nursing informatics competencies of practicing nurses in Korea: nursing informatics competencies questionnaire. Comput Inform Nurs 2014; 32 (12) 596-605
- 43 Farzandipour M, Mohamadian H, Akbari H, Safari S, Sharif R. Designing a national model for assessment of nursing informatics competency. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21 (01) 35
- 44 Jang SM, Kim J. Development of nursing informatics competence scale for Korean clinical nurses. Comput Inform Nurs 2022; 40 (10) 725-733
- 45 Rahman AA. Development of a Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment Tool (NICAT) [doctoral thesis]. Minneapolis: Walden University; 2015. . Accessed January 7, 2025 at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/1745
- 46 Frégeau H, Maillet L, Marchand JS, Folch N. Translation and cross-cultural validation of the Canadian nurse informatics competency assessment scale for French Canadian nurses. Comput Inform Nurs 2023; 41 (08) 549-553
- 47 Kaynar NS, Secginli S, West K. Psychometric testing of the Turkish version of the technology informatics guiding educational reform-based assessment of nursing informatics competencies Tool. Comput Inform Nurs 2020; 38 (11) 572-578
- 48 Etoom M, Akhu Zaheya L, Alnjadat R. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the self-assessment nursing informatics competency scale. Jordan Journal of Nursing Research. 2024; 3 (04)
- 49 Sarac E, Yildiz E. A cultural adaptation study of nursing informatics competency scale. Nurse Educ Pract 2025; 83: 104271
- 50 Khezri H, Abdekhoda M. Assessing nurses' informatics competency and identifying its related factors. J Res Nurs 2019; 24 (07) 529-538
- 51 Kleib M, Nagle L. Psychometric properties of the Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale. Comput Inform Nurs 2018; 36 (07) 359-365
- 52 Hunter K, McGonigle D, Hebda T, Sipes C, Hill T, Lamblin J. TIGER-Based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC). In: Rocha A, Correia A, Costanzo S, Reis L. eds. New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; vol 353). Springer, Cham; 2015.
- 53 Whitehead DL, Bryant LE, Kleir JA. Development and testing of an instrument to measure informatics knowledge, skills, and attitudes among entry-level nursing students. Online J Nurs Inform 2016;20(2)
- 54 Seo K, Min YH, Choi SH, Lee H. Evaluation of the Korean version of the self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies scale. BMC Nurs 2019; 18: 68
- 55 Kleib M, Nagle LM. The psychometric properties of version 2 of the Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale. Comput Inform Nurs 2023; 41 (03) 153-161
- 56 Yoon S, Shaffer JA, Bakken S. Refining a self-assessment of informatics competency scale using Mokken scaling analysis. J Interprof Care 2015; 29 (06) 579-586
- 57 Collins S, Yen PY, Phillips A, Kennedy MK. Nursing informatics competency assessment for the nurse leader: the Delphi study. J Nurs Adm 2017; 47 (04) 212-218
- 58 Yen PY, Phillips A, Kennedy MK, Collins S. Nursing informatics competency assessment for the nurse leader: instrument refinement, validation, and psychometric analysis. J Nurs Adm 2017; 47 (05) 271-277
- 59 Hill T, McGonigle D, Hunter KM, Sipes C, Hebda TL. An instrument for assessing advanced nursing informatics competencies. J Nurs Educ Pract 2014; 4 (07) 104-112
- 60 Jarva E, Oikarinen A, Andersson J, Tomietto M, Kääriäinen M, Mikkonen K. Healthcare professionals' digital health competence and its core factors; development and psychometric testing of two instruments. Int J Med Inform 2023; 171: 104995
- 61 Golz C, Hahn S, Zwakhalen SMG. Content validation of a questionnaire to measure digital competence of nurses in clinical practice. Comput Inform Nurs 2023; 41 (12) 949-956
- 62 Madhuwanthia M, Jayathilakeb S, Liyanaarachchigec N, Marasinghed R. Development and validation of an instrument to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices on digital health among nursing officers. Frontiers of Nursing 2024; 11 (03) 275-284
- 63 Golz C, Hahn S, Zwakhalen SMG. Psychometric validation of the digital competence questionnaire for nurses. SAGE Open Nurs 2024;10:23779608241272641
- 64 Adewale O, Apenteng BA, Shah GH, Mase WA. Assessing public health workforce informatics competencies: a study of 3 district health departments in Georgia. J Public Health Manag Pract 2022; 28 (02) E533-E541
- 65 Lee JJ, Clarke CL. Nursing students' attitudes towards information and communication technology: an exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Adv Nurs 2015; 71 (05) 1181-1193
- 66 Maag MM. Nursing students' attitudes toward technology: a national study. Nurse Educ 2006; 31 (03) 112-118
- 67 Akman AY, Erdemir F, Tekindal MA. Psychometric properties and reliability of the Turkish version of the technology attitudes survey and nursing students' attitudes toward technology. Int J Caring Sci 2014; 7 (02) 415-425
- 68 Yang L, Cui D, Zhu X, Zhao Q, Xiao N, Shen X. Perspectives from nurse managers on informatics competencies. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014: 391714
