Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2776-5896
Original article

The value of routine endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy undergoing active surveillance

Autor*innen

  • Sanjiv S.G. Gangaram Panday

    1   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Matteo Pittacolo

    1   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
    2   Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Sjoerd Lagarde

    1   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Bianca Mostert

    3   Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Judith Honing

    4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • J Jan B van Lanschot

    1   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Tanya M. Bisseling

    5   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6034)
  • Erik J Schoon

    6   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • Jolanda M van Dieren

    7   Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN1228)
  • Rutger Quispel

    8   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN84744)
  • L E Oostenbrug

    9   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Heerlen, Heerlen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN3802)
  • Andries van der Linden

    10   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis ZGT Almelo, Almelo, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN1153)
  • Sietske Corporaal

    11   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Frisius MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN4480)
  • Lieke Hol

    12   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN7000)
  • Eva Kouw

    13   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN72485)
  • Jurjen J Boonstra

    14   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN4501)
  • W.L. Hazen

    15   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN7898)
  • Erik Vegt

    16   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Manon C.W. Spaander

    4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
  • Bas P.L. Wijnhoven

    1   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)

Gefördert durch: ZonMw 843004104
Gefördert durch: KWF Kankerbestrijding 10825

Background Active surveillance for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) involves repeated diagnostic tests to detect cancer regrowth. In the SANO-trial, this included esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of suspected lymph nodes and FDG-PET-CT. The value of routine EUS in this setting remains largely unknown. This study assessed the diagnostic yield of EUS over FDG-PET-CT. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by clinical response evaluations with EGD, EUS and PET-CT was performed. Initial response assessment was performed within 3 months post-nCRT. Patients without tumor regrowth underwent active surveillance with repeated diagnosic tests. The primary outcome was the rate of EUS-detected lymph node metastases missed by PET-CT,after excluding cases with positive EGD findings or distant metastases. Results In total, 327 patients underwent both PET-CT and EUS post-nCRT, accounting for 1006 combined procedures: 327 at initial response assessment and 679 during active surveillance (6-60 months post-nCRT) in 121 patients. Positive lymph nodes were detected by EUS in 3.7% (12/327) of initial response assessments, 2.1% (7/327) were unidentified by PET-CT. During surveillance, this dropped to 0.9% (6/679) with 0.1% (1/679) missed by PET-CT. Conclusions EUS with FNA adds most value at 3 months post-nCRT, when the likelihood of detecting recurrence is highest. Beyond 3 months, its added value is limited (0.1% with negative PET-CT). Restricting the use of EUS to PET-suspicious nodes could omit 97.8% of EUS procedures.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. August 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 18. Dezember 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
21. Dezember 2025

© . The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany