Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2760-6659
Review Article

Fundamentals of Shared Decision-Making in Surgery

Authors

  • Keren Ladin

    1   Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States
    2   REACH Lab, Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States

  • Sungshin Na

    3   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a cornerstone of patient-centered care, particularly in colorectal surgery where treatment decisions often involve complex tradeoffs. This review outlines the principles, benefits, and challenges of SDM in surgical contexts, emphasizing its role in aligning clinical decisions with patient values. SDM enhances patient knowledge, reduces decisional conflict and regret, and improves satisfaction and adherence. It also offers systemic benefits, including reduced preference-sensitive surgeries and potential cost savings. Despite its promise, barriers such as limited health literacy, time constraints, and clinician discomfort with uncertainty hinder implementation. The review highlights validated tools and frameworks for studying SDM and explores the evolving role of decision aids in colorectal cancer care. Future research should focus on pragmatic, mixed-methods trials, and integration of SDM metrics into clinical workflows. Advancing SDM in colorectal surgery requires sustained efforts in clinician training, patient engagement, and culturally sensitive communication strategies.

Keywords

shared decision-making - patient centered - outcomes - prognosis - risks - values - clinical decision-making


Publication History

Article published online:
23 December 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA