Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2751-8845
Introducing the PRIME DIEP Flap: The Next Evolution in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
Authors
Funding Information This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748, which supports Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's research infrastructure.
Abstract
Background
Following its initial description in 1994, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. While sequential modifications have improved patient outcomes, functional donor site morbidity, abdominal bulge, and hernia remain a challenge. Techniques such as robotic surgery show promise in mitigating these issues but are limited by the need for specialized equipment and training.
Methods
The Paramedian Reflection for Innervated Muscle Enhancement (PRIME) DIEP flap is a novel technique that preserves innervated rectus muscle and minimizes fascial disruption without requiring robotic assistance for flap harvest. Patient selection is based on preoperative imaging, identifying a suitable dominant medial row perforator(s) with a short intramuscular course. A limited fascial incision over the perforator, followed by a paramedian fascial extension, medial reflection of the rectus abdominis, and submuscular pedicle dissection, allows for safe visualization while minimizing abdominal wall morbidity.
Results
Between June 2023 and February 2025, 15 patients underwent 18 PRIME DIEP flaps. All flaps survived, with one patient requiring reoperation for hematoma. There were no flap losses, readmissions, or donor site complications, such as bulge or hernia, at 30-day follow-up. About 72.2% of flaps were based on a single perforator, with an average flap weight of 631.7 g.
Conclusion
The PRIME DIEP flap represents the next evolution in autologous breast reconstruction by offering a reproducible, muscle- and nerve-sparing technique, enhancing abdominal wall function in suitable patients. This technical modification also allows for the incorporation of the fascial closure in a midline plication, which may improve vascularity of the fascia following DIEP flap harvest. Further prospective studies are underway to evaluate the impact on long-term functional outcomes and further refine patient selection criteria.
Publication History
Received: 19 June 2025
Accepted: 02 November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
21 November 2025
Article published online:
09 December 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 32-38
- 2 Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M. et al. The “gentleman's agreement” between perforator vessels and motor nerves in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (02) 500-505
- 3 Hallock GG. Avoiding denervation of rectus abdominis in DIEP flap harvest: The importance of medial row perforators. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1190-1196
- 4 Phillips TJ, Halvorson EG, Patel SA, Chang EI, Liu J, Disa JJ. Limiting the fascia incision length in a DIEP flap: Repercussion on abdominal wall morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (03) 844-849
- 5 Schaverien M, McCulley SJ. Paramuscular perforators in DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (05) 618-624
- 6 Healy C, Allen Sr RJ, Otterburn DM. et al. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: Twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 121-125
- 7 Nahabedian MY. The functional and aesthetic impact of breast reconstruction. Breast J 2006; 12 (S1): S41-S47
- 8 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Murray AC, Taylor GI. The ideal scenario in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap dissection: A complete muscle and nerve-sparing approach. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (08) 610-616
- 9 Selber JC. The robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 340-343
- 10 Kurlander DE, Le-Petross HT, Shuck JW, Butler CE, Selber JC. Robotic DIEP patient selection: Analysis of CT angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (12) e3970
- 11 Hendrickson SA, Dusseldorp JR. The medial paramuscular approach to DIEP flap pedicle dissection: Incorporating rectus diastasis repair into routine donor site closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025; 156 (04) 418e-484e
- 12 Gowda AU, Matatov T, McClure K, Mino M, Zakhary J. Approach to DIEP flap pedicle dissection via a midline fascial incision . Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (12) e6392
- 13 Weissler JM, Albino FP, Carney MJ, Wu LC. Revisiting the abdominal donor site: Introducing a novel nomenclature for autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (06) 1110-1118
- 14 Lee BT, Chen C, Nguyen MD, Lin SJ, Tobias AM. A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (02) 85-90

