Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2744-9871
Review of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
Authors
Funding Information Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under award number K23AG093166. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Abstract
As the U.S. population ages, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) cases are increasing, resulting in long wait times for specialist care. We review state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) applications in ADRD care, from streamlining clinical diagnosis to pioneering novel digital biomarkers. Near-term AI applications include neuroimaging interpretation, conversational agents for patient interviews, and digital cognitive assessments. Large language models show promise as collaborative partners, helping clinicians interpret complex data while supporting patients and caregivers. Emerging digital biomarkers—speech analysis, passive monitoring through wearable devices, electronic health record analysis, and multiomics—offer potential for continuous monitoring to detect cognitive decline years before traditional assessments. Despite the acceleration of AI innovation, most of these systems are inaccessible in clinical practice. Implementation bottlenecks include limited external validation, technical challenges, model biases, infrastructure, and regulatory requirements. This review aims to help neurologists navigate this rapidly evolving AI landscape and prepare for implementation in ADRD care.
Publication History
Received: 05 August 2025
Accepted: 12 November 2025
Article published online:
28 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 2013; 80 (19) 1778-1783
- 2 GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (05) 459-480
- 3 Fang M, Hu J, Weiss J. et al. Lifetime risk and projected burden of dementia. Nat Med 2025; 31 (03) 772-776
- 4 Bradford A, Kunik ME, Schulz P, Williams SP, Singh H. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2009; 23 (04) 306-314
- 5 Kotagal V, Langa KM, Plassman BL. et al. Factors associated with cognitive evaluations in the United States. Neurology 2015; 84 (01) 64-71
- 6 Babulal GM, Quiroz YT, Albensi BC. et al; International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment, Alzheimer's Association. Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: update and areas of immediate need. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 15 (02) 292-312
- 7 Boustani M, Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW. et al. Implementing a screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20 (07) 572-577
- 8 Bernstein A, Rogers KM, Possin KL. et al. Primary care provider attitudes and practices evaluating and managing patients with neurocognitive disorders. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (09) 1691-1692
- 9 Majersik JJ, Ahmed A, Chen IA. et al. A shortage of neurologists - we must act now: a report from the AAN 2019 transforming leaders program. Neurology 2021; 96 (24) 1122-1134
- 10 Satiani A, Niedermier J, Satiani B, Svendsen DP. Projected workforce of psychiatrists in the United States: a population analysis. Psychiatr Serv 2018; 69 (06) 710-713
- 11 The American Geriatric Society. Projected future need for geriatricians. 2016: 1-2 . Accessed September 7, 2023 at: https://www.americangeriatrics.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/projected-future-need-for-geriatricians.pdf
- 12 Modeling Early Detection and Geographic Variation in Health System Capacity for Alzheimer's Disease–Modifying Therapies. RAND Corporation; 2024.
- 13 van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P. et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 2023; 388 (01) 9-21
- 14 Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD. et al; TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Investigators. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023; 330 (06) 512-527
- 15 Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE) Model | CMS. Accessed April 18, 2024 at: https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/guide
- 16 Rathore S, Habes M, Iftikhar MA, Shacklett A, Davatzikos C. A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer's disease and its prodromal stages. Neuroimage 2017; 155: 530-548
- 17 Harold D, Abraham R, Hollingworth P. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet 2009; 41 (10) 1088-1093
- 18 Bron EE, Smits M, van der Flier WM. et al; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Standardized evaluation of algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI: the CADDementia challenge. Neuroimage 2015; 111: 562-579
- 19 Ding K, Chetty M, Noori Hoshyar A, Bhattacharya T, Klein B. Speech based detection of Alzheimer's disease: a survey of AI techniques, datasets and challenges. Artif Intell Rev 2024; 57 (12) 1-43
- 20 Schubert MC, Wick W, Venkataramani V. Performance of large language models on a neurology board-style examination. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (12) e2346721
- 21 Koga S, Martin NB, Dickson DW. Evaluating the performance of large language models: ChatGPT and Google Bard in generating differential diagnoses in clinicopathological conferences of neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Pathol 2024; 34 (03) e13207
- 22 Cabral S, Restrepo D, Kanjee Z. et al. Clinical reasoning of a generative artificial intelligence model compared with physicians. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184 (05) 581-583
- 23 Soman K, Rose PW, Morris JH. et al. Biomedical knowledge graph-optimized prompt generation for large language models. Bioinformatics 2024; 40 (09) btae560
- 24 Muralidharan V, Adewale BA, Huang CJ. et al. A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7 (01) 273
- 25 Health C for D and R. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices. FDA. Published online July 10, 2025. Accessed July 31, 2025 at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-enabled-medical-devices
- 26 Tu T, Schaekermann M, Palepu A. et al. Towards conversational diagnostic artificial intelligence. Nature 2025; 642 (8067) 442-450
- 27 Hendy A, Abdelrehim M, Sharaf A. et al. How good are GPT models at machine translation? A comprehensive evaluation. arXiv. Preprint posted online February 17, 2023
- 28 Gobinath A, Manjula DC, Suthan RSJ, Prakash P, Anandan M, Srinivasan A. Voice Assistant with AI Chat Integration using OpenAI. In: 2024 Third International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS). 2024: 1-6
- 29 Tong L, George B, Crotty BH. et al. Telemedicine and health disparities: Association between patient characteristics and telemedicine, in-person, telephone and message-based care during the COVID-19 pandemic. IPEM-Translation 2022; 3: 100010
- 30 Nota SPFT, Strooker JA, Ring D. Differences in response rates between mail, e-mail, and telephone follow-up in hand surgery research. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9 (04) 504-510
- 31 Pagán VM, McClung KS, Peden CJ. An observational study of disparities in telemedicine utilization in primary care patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28 (08) 1117-1125
- 32 Hinton L, Franz CE, Reddy G, Flores Y, Kravitz RL, Barker JC. Practice constraints, behavioral problems, and dementia care: primary care physicians' perspectives. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22 (11) 1487-1492
- 33 Hindelang M, Sitaru S, Zink A. Transforming health care through chatbots for medical history-taking and future directions: comprehensive systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12: e56628
- 34 Huq SM, Maskeliūnas R, Damaševičius R. Dialogue agents for artificial intelligence-based conversational systems for cognitively disabled: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2022; 0 (00) 1-20
- 35 Bin Sawad A, Narayan B, Alnefaie A. et al. A systematic review on healthcare artificial intelligent conversational agents for chronic conditions. Sensors (Basel) 2022; 22 (07) 2625
- 36 McGreevey III JD, Hanson III CW, Koppel R. Clinical, legal, and ethical aspects of artificial intelligence-assisted conversational agents in health care. JAMA 2020; 324 (06) 552-553
- 37 Mukherjee S, Gamble P, Ausin MS. et al. Polaris: a safety-focused LLM constellation architecture for healthcare. arXiv. Preprint posted online March 20, 2024
- 38 Yang Z, Xu X, Yao B. et al. Talk2Care: an LLM-based voice assistant for communication between healthcare providers and older adults. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2024; 8 (02) 1-35
- 39 Qu Y, Wang J. Performance and biases of large language models in public opinion simulation. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 2024; 11 (01) 1-13
- 40 Van Veen D, Van Uden C, Blankemeier L. et al. Adapted large language models can outperform medical experts in clinical text summarization. Nat Med 2024; 30 (04) 1134-1142
- 41 Ben AA, Yim WW, Fan Y, Lin T. An Empirical Study of Clinical Note Generation from Doctor-Patient Encounters. In: Vlachos A, Augenstein I. eds. Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2023: 2291-2302
- 42 Yan E. Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLM-Evaluators (aka LLM-as-Judge). eugeneyan.com. August 18, 2024. Accessed July 9, 2025 at: https://eugeneyan.com/writing/llm-evaluators/
- 43 Ye Y, Simpson E, Rodriguez RS. Using similarity to evaluate factual consistency in summaries. arXiv. Preprint posted online September 23, 2024
- 44 Tierney AA, Gayre G, Hoberman B. et al. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes to alleviate the burden of clinical documentation. NEJM Catal 2024; 5 (03) CAT.23.0404
- 45 Liu X, Liu H, Yang G. et al. A generalist medical language model for disease diagnosis assistance. Nat Med 2025; 31 (03) 932-942
- 46 Savage T, Nayak A, Gallo R, Rangan E, Chen JH. Diagnostic reasoning prompts reveal the potential for large language model interpretability in medicine. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7 (01) 20
- 47 Singhal K, Tu T, Gottweis J. et al. Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models. Nat Med 2025; 31 (03) 943-950
- 48 Treder MS, Lee S, Tsvetanov KA. Introduction to large language models (LLMs) for dementia care and research. Front Dement 2024; 3: 1385303
- 49 Sheehy L, Bouchard S, Kakkar A, El Hakim R, Lhoest J, Frank A. Development and initial testing of an artificial intelligence-based virtual reality companion for people living with dementia in long-term care. J Clin Med 2024; 13 (18) 5574
- 50 Hwang AS, Tannou T, Nanthakumar J. et al. Co-creating humanistic AI AgeTech to support dynamic care ecosystems: a preliminary guiding model. Gerontologist 2024; 65 (01) gnae093
- 51 Bernstein A, Rogers KM, Possin KL. et al. Dementia assessment and management in primary care settings: a survey of current provider practices in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19 (01) 919
- 52 Chen L, Zhen W, Peng D. Research on digital tool in cognitive assessment: a bibliometric analysis. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14: 1227261
- 53 Belleville S, LaPlume AA, Purkart R. Web-based cognitive assessment in older adults: Where do we stand?. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36 (05) 491-497
- 54 TabCAT | Detect cognitive changes earlier. TabCAT Health. Accessed October 11, 2024 at: https://tabcathealth.com
- 55 Sideman AB, Nguyen HQ, Langer-Gould A. et al. Stakeholder-informed pragmatic trial protocol of the TabCAT-BHA for the detection of cognitive impairment in primary care. BMC Prim Care 2024; 25 (01) 286
- 56 Tsoy E, Erlhoff SJ, Goode CA. et al. BHA-CS: A novel cognitive composite for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2020; 12 (01) e12042
- 57 Breithaupt AG, Sideman AB, Goode C. et al. Enhancing early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care with the TabCAT-BHA. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21 (07) e70437
- 58 Polk SE, Öhman F, Hassenstab J. et al. A scoping review of remote and unsupervised digital cognitive assessments in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 266
- 59 Veneziani I, Marra A, Formica C. et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in the neuropsychological assessment of dementia: a systematic review. J Pers Med 2024; 14 (01) 113
- 60 Liew TM, Foo JYH, Yang H. et al. PENSIEVE-AI a brief cognitive test to detect cognitive impairment across diverse literacy. Nat Commun 2025; 16 (01) 2847
- 61 Fristed E, Skirrow C, Meszaros M. et al. A remote speech-based AI system to screen for early Alzheimer's disease via smartphones. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2022; 14 (01) e12366
- 62 Buegler M, Harms R, Balasa M. et al. Digital biomarker-based individualized prognosis for people at risk of dementia. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2020; 12 (01) e12073
- 63 Libon DJ, Swenson R, Price CC. et al. Digital assessment of cognition in neurodegenerative disease: a data driven approach leveraging artificial intelligence. Front Psychol 2024; 15: 1415629
- 64 Ketata I, Ellouz E. Artificial intelligence-driven eye tracker models for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 2025;
- 65 Mancuso V, Sarcinella ED, Bruni F. et al. Systematic review of memory assessment in virtual reality: evaluating convergent and divergent validity with traditional neuropsychological measures. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18: 1380575
- 66 Faria AL, Latorre J, Silva Cameirão M, Bermúdez IBS, Llorens R. Ecologically valid virtual reality-based technologies for assessment and rehabilitation of acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1233346
- 67 Öhman F, Hassenstab J, Berron D, Schöll M, Papp KV. Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2021; 13 (01) e12217
- 68 Saab K, Tu T, Weng WH. et al. Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine. arXiv. Preprint posted online May 1, 2024. Accessed September 26, 2024 at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18416
- 69 Adnan T, Islam MS, Lee S. et al. AI-enabled Parkinson's disease screening using smile videos. NEJM AI 2025; 2 (07) AIoa2400950
- 70 Deng D, Ostrem JL, Nguyen V. et al. Interpretable video-based tracking and quantification of Parkinsonism clinical motor states. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2024; 10 (01) 122
- 71 Harrison TM, Landau SM, Baker SL, Boswell M, Jagust WJ. The Berkeley PET imaging pipeline: harmonization of Alzheimer's disease PET biomarkers across studies. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20 (S2): e095834
- 72 Jagust WJ, Koeppe RA, Rabinovici GD, Villemagne VL, Harrison TM, Landau SM. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The ADNI PET core at 20. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20 (10) 7340-7349
- 73 Jack Jr CR, Arani A, Borowski BJ. et al; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Overview of ADNI MRI. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20 (10) 7350-7360
- 74 Smith SM, Beckmann CF, Andersson J. et al; WU-Minn HCP Consortium. Resting-state fMRI in the human connectome project. Neuroimage 2013; 80: 144-168
- 75 Klöppel S, Stonnington CM, Barnes J. et al. Accuracy of dementia diagnosis: a direct comparison between radiologists and a computerized method. Brain 2008; 131 (Pt 11): 2969-2974
- 76 Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B. et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med 2019; 25 (01) 24-29
- 77 Xue C, Kowshik SS, Lteif D. et al. AI-based differential diagnosis of dementia etiologies on multimodal data. Nat Med 2024; 30 (10) 2977-2989
- 78 Rauschecker AM, Rudie JD, Xie L. et al. Artificial intelligence system approaching neuroradiologist-level differential diagnosis accuracy at brain MRI. Radiology 2020; 295 (03) 626-637
- 79 Ding Y, Sohn JH, Kawczynski MG. et al. A deep learning model to predict a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease by using 18F-FDG PET of the brain. Radiology 2019; 290 (02) 456-464
- 80 Barnard L, Botha H, Corriveau-Lecavalier N. et al; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. An FDG-PET-based machine learning framework to support neurologic decision-making in Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Neurology 2025; 105 (02) e213831
- 81 Mueller KD, Hermann B, Mecollari J, Turkstra LS. Connected speech and language in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a review of picture description tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2018; 40 (09) 917-939
- 82 de la Fuente Garcia S, Ritchie CW, Luz S. Artificial intelligence, speech, and language processing approaches to monitoring Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 78 (04) 1547-1574
- 83 Eyigoz E, Mathur S, Santamaria M, Cecchi G, Naylor M. Linguistic markers predict onset of Alzheimer's disease. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 28: 100583
- 84 Clarke N, Barrick TR, Garrard P. A comparison of connected speech tasks for detecting early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using natural language processing and machine learning. Front Comput Sci 2021;3:
- 85 Slegers A, Filiou RP, Montembeault M, Brambati SM. Connected speech features from picture description in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 65 (02) 519-542
- 86 Nasreen S, Hough J, Purver M. Detecting Alzheimer's Disease Using Interactional and Acoustic Features from Spontaneous Speech. In: 2021: 1962-1966
- 87 Thies T, Mallick E, Tröger J, Baykara E, Mücke D, Barbe MT. Automatic speech analysis combined with machine learning reliably predicts the motor state in people with Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2025; 11 (01) 105
- 88 García AM, Welch AE, Mandelli ML. et al. Automated detection of speech timing alterations in autopsy-confirmed nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia. Neurology 2022; 99 (05) e500-e511
- 89 Cho S, Cousins KAQ, Shellikeri S. et al. Lexical and acoustic speech features relating to Alzheimer disease pathology. Neurology 2022; 99 (04) e313-e322
- 90 Josephy-Hernandez S, Rezaii N, Jones A. et al. Automated analysis of written language in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Brain Commun 2023; 5 (04) fcad202
- 91 Vonk JMJ, Morin BT, Pillai J. et al. Automated speech analysis to differentiate frontal and right anterior temporal lobe atrophy in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2025; 104 (09) e213556
- 92 Cho S, Nevler N, Ash S. et al. Automated analysis of lexical features in frontotemporal degeneration. Cortex 2021; 137: 215-231
- 93 Vigo I, Coelho L, Reis S. Speech- and language-based classification of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9 (01) 27
- 94 Bertini F, Allevi D, Lutero G, Montesi D, Calzà L. Automatic speech classifier for mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. ACM Trans Comput Healthc 2021; 3 (01) 8:1-8:11
- 95 Kodali M, Kadiri SR, Alku P. Automatic classification of the severity level of Parkinson's disease: a comparison of speaking tasks, features, and classifiers. Comput Speech Lang 2024; 83: 101548
- 96 Chandler C, Diaz-Asper C, Turner RS, Reynolds B, Elvevåg B. An explainable machine learning model of cognitive decline derived from speech. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2023; 15 (04) e12516
- 97 Ostrand R, Gunstad J. Using automatic assessment of speech production to predict current and future cognitive function in older adults. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2021; 34 (05) 357-369
- 98 Robin J, Xu M, Balagopalan A. et al. Automated detection of progressive speech changes in early Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2023; 15 (02) e12445
- 99 Lukic S, Fan Z, García AM. et al. Discriminating nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants with automatically extracted morphosyntactic measures from connected speech. Cortex 2024; 173: 34-48
- 100 Li Q, Koehler S, Koenig A. et al. Associations between digital speech features of automated cognitive tasks and trajectories of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2025; 107 (01) 154-169
- 101 Fristed E, Skirrow C, Meszaros M. et al. Leveraging speech and artificial intelligence to screen for early Alzheimer's disease and amyloid beta positivity. Brain Commun 2022; 4 (05) fcac231
- 102 Agbavor F, Liang H. Predicting dementia from spontaneous speech using large language models. PLOS Digit Health 2022; 1 (12) e0000168
- 103 Rezaii N, Hochberg D, Quimby M. et al. Artificial intelligence classifies primary progressive aphasia from connected speech. Brain 2024; 147 (09) 3070-3082
- 104 Zargarbashi SSH, Babaali B. A Multi-Modal Feature Embedding Approach to Diagnose Alzheimer Disease from Spoken Language. arXiv. Preprint posted online October 1, 2019
- 105 König A, Zeghari R, Guerchouche R. et al. Remote cognitive assessment of older adults in rural areas by telemedicine and automatic speech and video analysis: protocol for a cross-over feasibility study. BMJ Open 2021; 11 (09) e047083
- 106 Taylor JC, Heuer HW, Clark AL. et al. Feasibility and acceptability of remote smartphone cognitive testing in frontotemporal dementia research. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2023; 15 (02) e12423
- 107 Diaz-Asper C, Hauglid MK, Chandler C, Cohen AS, Foltz PW, Elvevåg B. A framework for language technologies in behavioral research and clinical applications: Ethical challenges, implications, and solutions. Am Psychol 2024; 79 (01) 79-91
- 108 Huckvale K, Venkatesh S, Christensen H. Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2 (01) 88
- 109 Piau A, Wild K, Mattek N, Kaye J. Current state of digital biomarker technologies for real-life, home-based monitoring of cognitive function for mild cognitive impairment to mild Alzheimer disease and implications for clinical care: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (08) e12785
- 110 Kourtis LC, Regele OB, Wright JM, Jones GB. Digital biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: the mobile/wearable devices opportunity. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 9
- 111 Iakovakis D, Hadjidimitriou S, Charisis V, Bostantzopoulou S, Katsarou Z, Hadjileontiadis LJ. Touchscreen typing-pattern analysis for detecting fine motor skills decline in early-stage Parkinson's disease. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 7663
- 112 Winer JR, Lok R, Weed L. et al. Impaired 24-h activity patterns are associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and cognitive decline. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16 (01) 35
- 113 Bayat S, Babulal GM, Schindler SE. et al. GPS driving: a digital biomarker for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13 (01) 115
- 114 Van Egroo M, van Someren EJW, Grinberg LT, Bennett DA, Jacobs HIL. Associations of 24-hour rest-activity rhythm fragmentation, cognitive decline, and postmortem locus coeruleus hypopigmentation in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 2024; 95 (04) 653-664
- 115 Young CB, Smith V, Karjadi C. et al. Speech patterns during memory recall relates to early tau burden across adulthood. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20 (04) 2552-2563
- 116 Paolillo EW, Casaletto KB, Clark AL. et al; ALLFTD Consortium. Examining associations between smartphone use and clinical severity in frontotemporal dementia: proof-of-concept study. JMIR Aging 2024; 7 (01) e52831
- 117 Kaye J, Mattek N, Dodge HH. et al. Unobtrusive measurement of daily computer use to detect mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 10 (01) 10-17
- 118 Chudzik A, Śledzianowski A, Przybyszewski AW. Machine learning and digital biomarkers can detect early stages of neurodegenerative diseases. Sensors (Basel) 2024; 24 (05) 1572
- 119 Asllani B, Mullen DM. Using personal writings to detect dementia: a text mining approach. Health Informatics J 2023;29(4):14604582231204409
- 120 Onnela JP. Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data. Neuropsychopharmacology 2021; 46 (01) 45-54
- 121 Perez-Pozuelo I, Spathis D, Clifton EAD, Mascolo C. Wearables, smartphones, and artificial intelligence for digital phenotyping and health. Elsevier; 2021.
- 122 Qi W, Zhu X, Wang B. et al. Alzheimer's disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 366
- 123 Tang AS, Rankin KP, Cerono G. et al. Leveraging electronic health records and knowledge networks for Alzheimer's disease prediction and sex-specific biological insights. Nat Aging 2024; 4 (03) 379-395
- 124 Li Q, Yang X, Xu J. et al. Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using real-world electronic health records. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19 (08) 3506-3518
- 125 Richter-Laskowska M, Sobotnicka E, Bednorz A. Cognitive performance classification of older patients using machine learning and electronic medical records. Sci Rep 2025; 15 (01) 6564
- 126 Landi I, Glicksberg BS, Lee HC. et al. Deep representation learning of electronic health records to unlock patient stratification at scale. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3 (01) 96
- 127 Zhou M, Tang AS, Zhang H. et al. Identifying progression subphenotypes of Alzheimer's disease from large-scale electronic health records with machine learning. J Biomed Inform 2025; 165: 104820
- 128 Zhang X, Chou J, Liang J. et al. Data-driven subtyping of Parkinson's disease using longitudinal clinical records: a cohort study. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 797
- 129 Xu J, Yin R, Huang Y. et al. Identification of outcome-oriented progression subtypes from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease using electronic health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2024; 2023: 764-773
- 130 Mao C, Xu J, Rasmussen L. et al. AD-BERT: Using pre-trained language model to predict the progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. J Biomed Inform 2023; 144: 104442
- 131 West M, Cheng Y, He Y. et al. Unsupervised deep learning of electronic health records to characterize heterogeneity across Alzheimer disease and related dementias: cross-sectional study. JMIR Aging 2025; 8: e65178
- 132 Tang AS, Woldemariam SR, Miramontes S, Norgeot B, Oskotsky TT, Sirota M. Harnessing EHR data for health research. Nat Med 2024; 30 (07) 1847-1855
- 133 De Pablo-Fernández E, Lees AJ, Holton JL, Warner TT. Prognosis and neuropathologic correlation of clinical subtypes of Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76 (04) 470-479
- 134 Bettencourt C, Skene N, Bandres-Ciga S. et al; Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON) Network. Artificial intelligence for dementia genetics and omics. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19 (12) 5905-5921
- 135 Peng J, Bao Z, Li J. et al. DeepRisk: a deep learning approach for genome-wide assessment of common disease risk. Fundam Res (Beijing) 2024; 4 (04) 752-760
- 136 An L, Pichet-Binette A, Hristovska I. et al. Benchmarking the AI-based diagnostic potential of plasma proteomics for neurodegenerative disease in 17,170 people. medRxiv. Preprint posted online July 1, 2025
- 137 Iturria-Medina Y, Adewale Q, Khan AF. et al. Unified epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic taxonomy of Alzheimer's disease progression and heterogeneity. Sci Adv 2022; 8 (46) eabo6764
- 138 Frazer J, Notin P, Dias M. et al. Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data. Nature 2021; 599 (7883) 91-95
- 139 Li C, Zhang L, Zhuo Z. et al. Artificial intelligence-based recognition for variant pathogenicity of BRCA1 using AlphaFold2-predicted structures. Theranostics 2023; 13 (01) 391-402
- 140 Marsh JA, Huang G, Bowling K. et al. Evaluating pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. Neurotherapeutics 2025; 22 (03) e00527
- 141 Ramos EM, Dokuru DR, Van Berlo V. et al; ARTFL/LEFFTDS consortium. Genetic screening of a large series of North American sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia cases. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 16 (01) 118-130
- 142 Zack M, Stupichev DN, Moore AJ. et al. Artificial intelligence and multi-omics in pharmacogenomics: a new era of precision medicine. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health 2025; 3 (03) 100246
- 143 Qiu Y, Cheng F. Artificial intelligence for drug discovery and development in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 85: 102776
- 144 Doherty T, Yao Z, Khleifat AAL. et al; Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON) Network. Artificial intelligence for dementia drug discovery and trials optimization. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19 (12) 5922-5933
- 145 AI's potential to accelerate drug discovery needs a reality check. Nature 2023; 622 (7982) 217-217
- 146 Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2 (10) 719-731
- 147 Aristidou A, Jena R, Topol EJ. Bridging the chasm between AI and clinical implementation. Lancet 2022; 399 (10325): 620
- 148 Mukherjee P, Shen TC, Liu J, Mathai T, Shafaat O, Summers RM. Confounding factors need to be accounted for in assessing bias by machine learning algorithms. Nat Med 2022; 28 (06) 1159-1160
- 149 Kapoor S, Narayanan A. Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns (N Y) 2023; 4 (09) 100804
- 150 Yagis E, Atnafu SW, García Seco de Herrera A. et al. Effect of data leakage in brain MRI classification using 2D convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 22544
- 151 Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability: Certification Program Updates, Algorithm Transparency, and Information Sharing. Vol 89. Federal Information & News Dispatch, LLC; 2024: 1192 . Accessed September 20, 2024 at: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2912085944/citation/14f0ab28e9dd4318pq/1
- 152 Savulescu J, Giubilini A, Vandersluis R, Mishra A. Ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine. Singapore Med J 2024; 65 (03) 150-158
- 153 Protections (OHRP) O for HR. IRB Considerations on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Human Subjects Research. October 21, 2022. Accessed September 23, 2024 at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/recommendations/irb-considerations-use-artificial-intelligence-human-subjects-research/index.html
- 154 Sarkar AR, Chuang YS, Mohammed N, Jiang X. De-identification is not always enough. arXiv. Preprint posted online January 31, 2024. Accessed September 23, 2024 at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00179
- 155 Broniatowski DA. Psychological Foundations of Explainability and Interpretability in Artificial Intelligence. National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.); 2021. :NIST IR 8367
- 156 Tabassi E. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.); 2023. :NIST AI 100–1
- 157 Phillips PJ, Hahn CA, Fontana PC. et al. Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence. National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.); 2021. :NIST IR 8312
- 158 Hussain SA, Bresnahan M, Zhuang J. The bias algorithm: how AI in healthcare exacerbates ethnic and racial disparities - a scoping review. Ethn Health 2025; 30 (02) 197-214
- 159 Idorenyin Imoh U, Charity T. Cultural and social factors in care delivery among African American caregivers of persons with dementia: a scoping review. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2023;9:23337214231152002
- 160 Shi L, Chen CC, Nie X, Zhu J, Hu R. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to primary care among people with chronic conditions. J Am Board Fam Med 2014; 27 (02) 189-198
- 161 Gianfrancesco MA, Tamang S, Yazdany J, Schmajuk G. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178 (11) 1544-1547
- 162 Yuan C, Linn KA, Hubbard RA. Algorithmic fairness of machine learning models for Alzheimer disease progression. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (11) e2342203