RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2737-7914
World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young Neurosurgeons Survey: An Assessment of the Global Neurosurgery Research Environment, Capacity, Output and Barriers
Autoren
Abstract
Background
The largest neurosurgical disease burden is found within low-and-middle-income countries. Despite this, a gap exists between the burden of disease and research output. This study explored the global neurosurgical research environment, with regards to capacity and output. We also explored the structural barriers to conducting research.
Methods
In this cross-sectional survey, we examined the global neurosurgical research environment by collecting data from neurosurgeons and trainees from six continental regions. The survey was conducted in five languages and stratified to the following themes: demographics, research capacity, research output, and barriers to participating in research.
Results
A total of 565 responses were received, and participants were split equally across trainees and consultants. The median years of practice was 8 years, and 60.2% of respondents worked at government hospitals with a university affiliation. The research databases available reflect the current neurosurgical disease burden, although only 81.6% have science and ethics approval. The biggest barriers to conducting research were the availability of human resources (68.4%) and time (62.9%).
Conclusion
The study reports on the current global neurosurgical research environment. The results show that the majority of neurosurgeons (98.2%) believe conducting research is important. Despite the challenges, there is a hunger to grow academic neurosurgery globally.
Keywords
education - global neurosurgery - research capacity - research equity - young neurosurgeons* These authors share senior authorship.
** The details of the committee are given in the [ Supplementary Appendix ] (available in the online version only).
Publikationsverlauf
Accepted Manuscript online:
06. November 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. November 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Carroll WM. The global burden of neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (05) 418-419
- 2 Alemayehu C, Mitchell G, Nikles J. Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries-a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17 (01) 37
- 3 Boutayeb A. The double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases in developing countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2006; 100 (03) 191-199
- 4 Dewan MC, Rattani A, Fieggen G. et al; Executive Summary of the Global Neurosurgery Initiative at the Program in Global Surgery and Social Change. Global neurosurgery: the current capacity and deficit in the provision of essential neurosurgical care. J Neurosurg 2018; 130 (04) 1055-1064
- 5 Leape LL, Berwick DM, Bates DW. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA 2002; 288 (04) 501-507
- 6 Røttingen JA, Regmi S, Eide M. et al. Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory?. Lancet 2013; 382 (9900) 1286-1307
- 7 Ham EI, Perez-Chadid DA, Wang Z. et al. Authorship disparities in international neurosurgical research collaborations: a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 177: 165-171.e2
- 8 Ham EI, Kim J, Kanmounye US. et al. Cohesion between research literature and health system level efforts to address global neurosurgical inequity: a scoping review. World Neurosurg 2020; 143: e88-e105
- 9 Cannizzaro D, Safa A, Bisoglio A. et al. Second footprint of reports from low- and low- to middle-income countries in the neurosurgical data: a study from 2018-2020 compared with data from 2015-2017. World Neurosurg 2022; 168: e666-e674
- 10 Røttingen JA, Chamas C, Goyal LC, Harb H, Lagrada L, Mayosi BM. Securing the public good of health research and development for developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90 (05) 398-400
- 11 Kumar M, Atwoli L, Burgess RA. et al. What should equity in global health research look like?. Lancet 2022; 400 (10347): 145-147
- 12 Robertson FC, Gnanakumar S, Karekezi C. et al; WFNS Young Neurosurgeons Committee. The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young Neurosurgeons Survey (Part II): barriers to professional development and service delivery in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg X 2020; 8: 100084
- 13 Javed S, Perez-Chadid D, Yaqoob E. et al; WFNS Young Neurosurgeons Forum. Needs, roles, and challenges of Young Asian neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg 2023; 177: e118-e125
- 14 Kanmounye US, Robertson FC, Thango NS. et al; CAANS Young Neurosurgeons Committee and WFNS Young Neurosurgeons Committee. Needs of Young African neurosurgeons and residents: a cross-sectional study. Front Surg 2021; 8: 647279
- 15 Perez-Chadid DA, Veiga Silva AC, Asfaw ZK. et al. Needs, roles, and challenges of Young Latin American and Caribbean neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg 2023; 176: e190-e199
- 16 Gnanakumar S, Abou El Ela Bourquin B, Robertson FC. et al; World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young Neurosurgeons Committee. The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young neurosurgeons survey (part I): demographics, resources, and education. World Neurosurg X 2020; 8: 100083
- 17 Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004; 6 (03) e34
- 18 Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (09) 1277-1288
- 19 Shi HH, Westrup AM, O'Neal CM, Hendrix MC, Dunn IF, Gernsback JE. Women in neurosurgery around the world: a systematic review and discussion of barriers, training, professional development, and solutions. World Neurosurg 2021; 154: 206-213.e18
- 20 Karekezi C, Thango N, Aliu-Ibrahim SA. et al. History of African women in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50 (03) E15
- 21 Adachi K, Hukamdad M, Raymundo A, Jiang SH, Mehta AI. Women in neurosurgery: trends in the United States. World Neurosurg 2024; 184: e346-e353
- 22 Wolfert C, Rohde V, Mielke D, Hernández-Durán S. Female neurosurgeons in Europe-on a prevailing glass ceiling. World Neurosurg 2019; 129: 460-466
- 23 Hummel P, Adam T, Reis A, Littler K. Taking stock of the availability and functions of National Ethics Committees worldwide. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22 (01) 56
- 24 Hunter D. The roles of research ethics committees: implications for membership. Res Ethics 2007; 3 (01) 24-26
- 25 Paradie E, Warman PI, Waguia-Kouam R. et al. The scope, growth, and inequities of the global neurosurgery literature: a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 167: e670-e684
- 26 Hauptman JS, Chow DS, Martin NA, Itagaki MW. Research productivity in neurosurgery: trends in globalization, scientific focus, and funding. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (06) 1262-1272
- 27 Keswani SG, Moles CM, Morowitz M. et al; Basic Science Committee of the Society of University Surgeons. The future of basic science in academic surgery: identifying barriers to success for surgeon-scientists. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (06) 1053-1059
- 28 Rangel SJ, Efron B, Moss RL. Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (03) 277-286 , discussion 286–287
- 29 Mann M, Tendulkar A, Birger N, Howard C, Ratcliffe MB. National Institutes of Health funding for surgical research. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (02) 217-221
