Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2733-4579
Radioiodine Therapy Unit as a “No-Care” Ward – A First Experience Report
Radiojodtherapie als „No-Care“ Station – Ein ErfahrungsberichtAuthors
Abstract
Aim
Nuclear medicine landscape has been changing over the past decade due to the rise of radioligand therapies. However, patients receiving radioiodine therapy for benign thyroid disease still account for approx. one third of the patients on a regular nuclear medicine ward. A substantial part of these patients are hospitalized for radiation protection only and do not require nursing staff. This report aims at describing the implementation of a “no-care” nuclear medicine ward with medical students as staff. We report on the training process, patient and student satisfaction as well as the impact and strengths of this concept.
Methods
A separated nuclear medicine ward (10 beds) was established at a university hospital in Germany. After specific training, two students were assigned per working shift in a regular three-shift-system. Patients were evaluated according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients and students answered two separate surveys, assessing the satisfaction with the concept.
Results
172/319 (53.9%) of the patients met the inclusion criteria. The “no-care” ward was opened six times between April 2024 and June 2025 and the duration was between 10 and 20 days. 101 patients were treated using I-131 sodium iodine, achieving 68.5 DRG relative units. Patient satisfaction survey revealed very high positive response rates. 27 medical students were assigned to the “no-care” ward. The majority of students stated a positive effect on overall medical knowledge and workflow understanding in a hospital.
Conclusion
Using medical students as staff on a “no-care” nuclear medicine ward is feasible and safe. In view of nursing staff shortage, this concept might contribute to adaptive caring in nuclear medicine therapies after careful patient selection.
Publication History
Received: 05 September 2025
Accepted: 15 September 2025
Article published online:
24 November 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Institut für die Entgeltentwicklung im Krankenhaus. InEK Datenportal. Accessed August 01, 2025 at: https://daten.inek.org/DataPortal/
- 2 Zippel C, Giesel FL, Kratochwil C. et al. PSMA radioligand therapy could pose infrastructural challenges for nuclear medicine: results of a basic calculation for the capacity planning of nuclear medicine beds in the German hospital sector. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60: 216-223
- 3 Bundesagentur für Arbeit. Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit, Berichte: Blickpunkt Arbeitsmarkt – Fachkräfteengpassanalyse 2024. In. Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit; 2025.
- 4 Statistisches Bundesamt. Pflegekräftevorausberechnung. Accessed August 19, 2025 at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsvorausberechnung/pflegekraeftevorausberechnung.html
- 5 Bonnema SJ, Hegedüs L. Radioiodine therapy in benign thyroid diseases: effects, side effects, and factors affecting therapeutic outcome. Endocr Rev 2012; 33: 920-980
- 6 Djekidel M. The changing landscape of nuclear medicine and a new era: the “NEW (Nu) CLEAR Medicine”: a framework for the future. Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine 2023; 3
- 7 Wieditz M, Essler M, Luster M. Nursing in Nuclear medicine – decisive factor for future Theranostics. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60: 5-6
- 8 Turner JH. Responsible Radionuclide Cancer Care. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2021; 36: 617-623
- 9 Gee AD, Andersson J, Bhalla R. et al. Training the next generation of radiopharmaceutical scientists. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 2020; 88/89: 10-13
- 10 Lorenz R, Dietlein M, Reiners C. Nuclear medical inpatient treatment in Germany – analysis of structured quality reports 2004–2008. Nuklearmedizin 2010; 49: 49-57
- 11 Lorenz R, Buck A, Reiners C. In-patient nuclear medicine therapy in Germany from 2010 to 2012. Analysis of structured quality reports. Nuklearmedizin Nuclear medicine 2015; 54: 61-68
- 12 Young JD, Jauregui-Osoro M, Wong WL. et al. An overview of nuclear medicine research in the UK and the landscape for clinical adoption. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42: 1301-1312
- 13 Lidskog M, Löfmark A, AhlströM G. Learning about each other: Studentsʼ conceptions before and after interprofessional education on a training ward. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2008; 22: 521-533
- 14 Mette M, Baur C, Hinrichs J. et al. Gaining interprofessional knowledge and interprofessional competence on a training ward. Medical Teacher 2021; 43: 583-589
- 15 Ivarson J, Zelic L, Sondén A. et al. Call the On-Call: a study of student learning on an interprofessional training ward. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2021; 35: 275-283
- 16 Mette M, Baur C, Hinrichs J. et al. Implementing MIA – Mannheimʼs interprofessional training ward: first evaluation results. GMS J Med Educ 2019; 36: Doc35
- 17 European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Radionuclide Therapy Management. In. Vienna, Austria; 2022: 106.
- 18 Köberich S, Farin E. A systematic review of instruments measuring patientsʼ perceptions of patient-centred nursing care. Nursing Inquiry 2015; 22: 106-120
- 19 Hellinger A, Hörscher D, Biber FC. et al. Sicherheit der Patientenversorgung auf einer viszeralchirurgischen interprofessionellen Ausbildungsstation. Die Chirurgie 2024; 95: 299-306
- 20 Heller S, Reichel JL, Mülder LM. et al. The association between health behaviours and academic performance moderated by trait mindfulness amongst university students: an observational study. Front Public Health 2024; 12: 1340235
